Numerical studies on behaviour of bolted ball-cylinder joint under axial force
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an extensive numerical analysis program devoted to the investigation of the mechanical behaviour of bolted ball-cylinder joints. The analysis program is developed by means of finite element (FE) models implemented in the non-linear code ABAQUS. The FE models have been accurately calibrated on the basis of available experimental results. It is indicated that the FE models could be used effectively to describe the mechanical performance of bolted ball-cylinder joints, including failure modes, stress distributions and loaddisplacement curves. Therefore, the proposed FE models could be regarded as an efficient and accurate tool to investigate the mechanical behavior of bolted ball-cylinder joints. In addition, to develop a further investigation, parametric studies were performed, varying the dimensions of hollow cylinders, rectangular tubes, convex washers and ribbed stiffener. It is found that the dimensions of hollow cylinders, rectangular tubes and ribbed stiffener influenced the mechanical behaviour of bolted ball-cylinder joints significantly. On the contrary, the effects of the dimensions of convex washers were negligible.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Thin-Wall. Struct. · 2015 · 86 · 9410.1016/j.tws.2014.10.008 ↗
2. Thin-Wall. Struct. · 2015 · 94 · 43510.1016/j.tws.2015.05.003 ↗
3. Int. J. Sci. Emerg. Technol. · 2012 · 4 · 116
4. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2012 · 68 · 12610.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.020 ↗
5. J. Appl. Sci. · 2010 · 10 · 72410.3923/jas.2010.724.730 ↗
6. Eng. Struct. · 2008 · 30 · 23210.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.010 ↗
7. Adv. Struct. Eng. · 2015 · 18 · 184510.1260/1369-4332.18.11.1845 ↗
8. Thin-Wall. Struct. · 2015 · 87 · 3010.1016/j.tws.2014.11.001 ↗
9. KSCE J. Civil Eng. · 2016 · 20 · 82010.1007/s12205-015-1614-3 ↗
10. J. Strain Anal. · 1997 · 32 · 43510.1243/0309324971513544 ↗
11. J. Strain Anal. · 2000 · 35 · 20510.1243/0309324001514350 ↗
12. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2013 · 80 · 9110.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.016 ↗
13. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2006 · 62 · 37810.1016/j.jcsr.2005.07.012 ↗
14. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2006 · 62 · 39110.1016/j.jcsr.2005.07.010 ↗
15. Comput. Struct. · 2007 · 85 · 36010.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.025 ↗
16. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2013 · 90 · 1310.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.017 ↗
17. Comput. Struct. · 2012 · 90-91 · 7610.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.005 ↗
18. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2014 · 98 · 15810.1016/j.jcsr.2014.03.006 ↗
19. Eng. Struct. · 2014 · 64 · 3910.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.034 ↗
20. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. · 2009 · 14 · 41010.1007/s12204-009-0410-y ↗
21. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2015 · 112 · 33910.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.011 ↗
22. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Engineering Science) · 2000 · 34 · 77
23. Appl. Math. Comput. · 2012 · 219 · 365510.1016/j.amc.2012.09.063 ↗