journal article·2016-10-30

Buckling analysis of nanocomposite cut out plate using domain decomposition method and orthogonal polynomials

M. Jamali, T. Shojaee, R. Kolahchi, B. Mohammadi

Steel and Composite Structures· Volume 22· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this editorial, buckling analytical investigation of the nanocomposite plate with square cut out reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) surrounded by Pasternak foundation is considered. The plate is presumed has square cut out in center and resting on Pasternak foundation. CNTs are used as amplifier in plate for diverse distribution, such as uniform distribution (UD) and three patterns of functionally graded (FG) distribution types of CNTs (FG-X, FG-A and FG-O). Moreover, the effective mechanical properties of nanocomposite plate are calculated from the rule of mixture. Domain decomposition method and orthogonal polynomials are applied in order to define the shape function of nanocomposite plate with square cut out. Finally, Rayleigh-Ritz energy method is used to obtain critical buckling load of system. A detailed parametric study is conducted to explicit the effects of the dimensions of plate, length of square cut out, different distribution of CNTs, elastic medium and volume fraction of CNTs. It is found from results that increase the dimensions of plate and length of square cut out have negative impact on buckling behavior of system but considering CNTs in plate has positive influence.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol. · 2014 · 7 · 35
2. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2016 · 21 · 88310.12989/scs.2016.21.4.883 ↗
3. J. Sound Vib. · 1985 · 102 · 49310.1016/S0022-460X(85)80109-7 ↗
4. Compos. Struct. · 2012 · 94 · 160510.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.032 ↗
5. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 25 · 80910.1007/s12206-011-0127-3 ↗
6. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. · 2014 · 12 · 17
7. Composite Structures · 2015 · 119 · 23810.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.037 ↗
8. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 3 · 4090
9. Compos. Struct. · 2016 · 150 · 25510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.023 ↗
10. Comput. Struct. · 1990 · 34 · 82710.1016/0045-7949(90)90353-4 ↗
11. Comput. Struct. · 1990 · 37 · 29510.1016/0045-7949(90)90321-R ↗
12. Appl. Acoust. · 1989 · 28 · 4910.1016/0003-682X(89)90030-3 ↗
13. Int. J. Solid. Struct. · 1993 · 30 · 328110.1016/0020-7683(93)90114-M ↗
14. J. Sound Vib. · 1995 · 183 · 22110.1006/jsvi.1995.0251 ↗
15. Int. J. Solid. Struct. · 2001 · 38 · 493710.1016/S0020-7683(00)00329-2 ↗
16. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2003 · 45 · 94110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00109-7 ↗
17. J. Vib. Control · 2014 · 22 · 1790
18. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct. · 2014 · 1 · 17
19. Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J. · 2015 · 53 · 479
20. Mech. Res. Commun. · 2009 · 36 · 93310.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.08.006 ↗
21. Thin-Wall. Struct. · 2013 · 73 · 22910.1016/j.tws.2013.08.007 ↗
22. Physics Letters A · 2009 · 373 · 418210.1016/j.physleta.2009.09.021 ↗
23. Computat. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 47 · 26810.1016/j.commatsci.2009.08.001 ↗
24. Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J. · 2009 · 33 · 19310.12989/sem.2009.33.2.193 ↗
25. Mech. Res. Commun. · 2011 · 38 · 48110.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.06.003 ↗
26. Polymer · 1999 · 40 · 596710.1016/S0032-3861(99)00166-4 ↗
27. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2015 · 19 · 125910.12989/scs.2015.19.5.1259 ↗
28. Appl. Math. Model. · 2015 · 39 · 545910.1016/j.apm.2014.12.058 ↗
29. Compos. Struct. · 2012 · 94 · 145010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.010 ↗