Optimization of retarder parameters for switchable privacy mode automotive displays under asymmetric viewing conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
A switchable privacy mode (SPM) display should not be seen by a driver during driving (privacy mode), but it needs to be seen by the driver and a co-driver when a car is stopped (share mode). In this work, a SPM display was designed using a bottom twisted-nematic (TN) liquid crystal display (LCD) and a top in-plane switching (IPS) LCD where a half-wave plate (HWP) is located between the two LCD panels. The SPM display in front of the co-driver was considered, which is seen under asymmetric viewing conditions. The orientation of the slow axis, retardation dispersion, and biaxiality of the retarder were varied to maximize the SPM’s optical performance in the driver’s and co-driver’s viewing directions. Transmittance at the driver’s viewing direction can be reduced from 4.22 to 0.03% in privacy mode by replacing the positive dispersion retarder with a negative dispersion retarder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Future Semiconductor Convergence Technology Research Center, Division of Electronics Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
Auto Panel Material Development Team, LG Display, Gumi, Korea
Sales Team, Sanayi System Co., Ltd., Incheon, Korea
Funding
Jeonbuk National University · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. D.S. Hermann 2018 25th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD). IEEE 1–6.10.23919/AM-FPD.2018.8437433 ↗
2. B. Straub and A.G. Daimler 2018 25th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD). IEEE 1–4.10.23919/AM-FPD.2018.8437443 ↗
3. S. Wu 2022 29th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD). IEEE 45–47.10.23919/AM-FPD54920.2022.9851328 ↗
4. 10.1002/sdtp.1647110.1002/sdtp.16471 ↗
5. 10.1002/sdtp.1573910.1002/sdtp.15739 ↗
6. 10.1364/AO.58.00610510.1364/AO.58.006105 ↗
7. 10.1002/sdtp.1546410.1002/sdtp.15464 ↗
8. 10.1002/sdtp.1578210.1002/sdtp.15782 ↗
9. 10.3390/cryst1210134710.3390/cryst12101347 ↗
10. 10.1002/jsid.52810.1002/jsid.528 ↗
11. 10.1002/sdtp.1384910.1002/sdtp.13849 ↗
12. P. Yeh, and C. Gu, Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays, 67 vols (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2009).
13. 10.1364/OE.24.01598710.1364/OE.24.015987 ↗
14. 10.1002/sdtp.1164010.1002/sdtp.11640 ↗
15. 10.1002/sdtp.1381910.1002/sdtp.13819 ↗
16. 10.1002/sdtp.1475810.1002/sdtp.14758 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0141-9382(99)00026-810.1016/S0141-9382(99)00026-8 ↗
18. 10.1080/15980316.2021.199933810.1080/15980316.2021.1999338 ↗
19. S. Ahn, and J.-H. Lee, Curr. Opt. Photonics 5 (1), 45–51 (2021).
20. 10.1364/AO.52.00778510.1364/AO.52.007785 ↗
21. 10.1080/15980316.2014.100325210.1080/15980316.2014.1003252 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10953110.1016/j.optmat.2019.109531 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11408910.1016/j.optmat.2023.114089 ↗
24. 10.1109/TIM.2020.300527510.1109/TIM.2020.3005275 ↗
25. 10.1039/D2ME00089J10.1039/D2ME00089J ↗
26. 10.1117/1.OE.55.2.02710610.1117/1.OE.55.2.027106 ↗
27. O. Parri, G. Smith, R. Harding, H.-J. Yoon, I. Gardiner, J. Sargent, and K. Skjonnemand, Adv. Disp. Technol. E-pap. Flex. Disp. 7956, 208–218 (2011).