Effect of a P -doped hole transport and charge generation layer on single and two-tandem blue top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The transmittance of the p-doped hole transporting layer (p-HTL) and the charge generation layer (p-CGL) corresponding to the photoluminescence (PL) of blue dopants in an emitting layer decreases as the ratio of the p-dopant increases due to the absorption of the p-dopant. However, there was little difference in the luminous efficiency of blue top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes using p-HTL or p-CGL at a maximum doping ratio of 20%. p-HTL for a single structure required a 5% doping ratio to ensure sufficient electrical characteristics, but p-CGL for the two-stack tandem structure required more than a 10% doping ratio. The optical simulation showed that the device was affected by the specific absorbance of the p-dopant depending on the doping ratio and thickness. Although there was no significant difference in efficiency depending on the doping ratio at a thickness of 10 nm, the reduction rate of the external quantum efficiency increased from over 20 nm due to the doping ratio.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Reality Device Research Division, ICT Creative Research Laboratory, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Department of Creative Convergence Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Funding
Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program · MOTIE/KEIT · National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Education of Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/2595410.1038/25954 ↗
2. Liu Z. · J. Phys. Chem · 2010 · 114 · 1674610.1021/jp105782w ↗
3. 10.1143/JJAP.44.375110.1143/JJAP.44.3751 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.23532510.1103/PhysRevB.80.235325 ↗
5. 10.1088/0022-3727/29/11/00410.1088/0022-3727/29/11/004 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.212614010.1063/1.2126140 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.11312310.1063/1.113123 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4TC02875A10.1039/C4TC02875A ↗
9. 10.1080/15980316.2019.167124010.1080/15980316.2019.1671240 ↗
10. 10.7567/JJAP.50.11020210.7567/JJAP.50.110202 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.158512310.1063/1.1585123 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.orgel.2003.08.00410.1016/j.orgel.2003.08.004 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.145569710.1063/1.1455697 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.12198210.1063/1.121982 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssa.20122819910.1002/pssa.201228199 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.149650210.1063/1.1496502 ↗
17. M. Petrosino, P. Vacca, R. Miscioscia, G. Nenna, C. Minarini, and A. Rubino, Effect of PEDOT: PSS ratio on the electrical and optical properties of OLEDs, Photonic Materials, Devices, and Applications II. Vol. 6593. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2007).
18. Tietze M.L. · Nat. commun · 2018 · 9 · 110.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.19.0A125010.1364/OE.19.0A1250 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20150606510.1002/adma.201506065 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.05.01110.1016/j.orgel.2008.05.011 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0001010.1021/acsphotonics.5b00010 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.325943610.1063/1.3259436 ↗
24. 10.1109/JPROC.2009.202241810.1109/JPROC.2009.2022418 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.01910.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.019 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13391-015-5118-610.1007/s13391-015-5118-6 ↗