journal article·2026-07Open access

A critical review of online sliver monitoring technologies in the draw frame of spinning preparation systems and future advances

Ahsan Habib, Osman Babaarslan

Abstract

The quality of sliver at the draw frame stage is a decisive factor in achieving yarn uniformity, particularly in air-jet (Vortex, MVS), Open-end rotor, and friction spinning, where drawn slivers are passed directly into the spinning unit without a roving frame. Current auto-levelling systems enhance sliver evenness and productivity but can only be used for mass control, not to measure more detailed fiber-level properties. Therefore, the current auto-levelling technologies cannot be completely extended to high-level decision-making, fault diagnosis in real-time, and intelligent optimization of draw frame passages in accordance with the real sliver quality. Traditional methods of assessing slivers rely on offline testing with equipment such as the USTER Tester, which is highly precise but incapable of identifying defects during manufacturing. In this review, the author evaluates current technologies for monitoring fibers, slivers, and yarns, including optical, capacitive, and vision-based systems, as well as IoT-enabled platforms in modern spinning mills. An overall evaluation of the existing limitations shows a significant gap in real-time monitoring of sliver quality. To satisfy this requirement, a theoretical framework of an online sliver testing system is suggested to be incorporated at the draw frame delivery. The system also has integrated high-quality sensors, real-time sensor processing, machine sensor integration, and smart feedback control. The review illustrates the possibilities that such a system has to improve the draw frame operation, minimize scraps, enhance the uniformity of yarns, and facilitate Industry 4.0 changeover in spinning processes. This review not only summarizes existing sliver monitoring technologies but also defines the technological gap between current draw frame control and the requirements of real-time intelligent monitoring in spinning, proposing a feasible framework for future industrial implementation. The suggested solution not only improves the quality evaluation in real-time and process efficiency but also outlines the basis of AI-based manufacturing systems in the textile industry in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Research in Cotton Cultivation · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Cukurova University

Bangladesh University of Textiles

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/00405000.2024.237303210.1080/00405000.2024.2373032 ↗
2. Jianqin T, Hongwei Z, Xiyong C. Evenness quality control for worsted pure wool yarn based on quality index number. Textile Research Journal 2014; 35: 28–34.
3. 10.1002/pls2.1015810.1002/pls2.10158 ↗
4. Günaydin GK, Soydan AS. Vortex spinning system and vortex yarn structure. Vortex structures in fluid dynamic problems 2017: 247–269.
5. 10.1177/00405175030730041310.1177/004051750307300413 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405167.2012.73934510.1080/00405167.2012.739345 ↗
7. 10.1108/RJTA-15-03-2011-B01010.1108/RJTA-15-03-2011-B010 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-006-0580-910.1007/s00170-006-0580-9 ↗
9. 10.15406/jteft.2019.05.0020410.15406/jteft.2019.05.00204 ↗
10. Adamu BF, Atalie D, Liyew EZ. Quality evaluation of Ethiopian 100% cotton carded ring spun yarn with respect to USTER Standards. Journal of Engineering 2021; 2021(1): 4286957–4286959. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4286957
11. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.00910.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.009 ↗
12. 10.1007/s40430-022-03875-310.1007/s40430-022-03875-3 ↗
13. Carvalho V Belsley M Vasconcelos RM et al. Yarn parameterization correlation using optical and capacitive sensors approaches. In: 2009 35th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics 2009 November pp. 1941–1946. IEEE.10.1109/IECON.2009.5414846 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sna.2011.03.00610.1016/j.sna.2011.03.006 ↗
15. 10.2174/221032791120203000210.2174/2210327911202030002 ↗
16. 10.3390/electronics1201023610.3390/electronics12010236 ↗
17. Ozkaya YA. Evaluation of yarn characteristics using compute WO 99/34044r vision and image processing. (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University), 2004.
18. 10.1108/RJTA-10-2024-017410.1108/RJTA-10-2024-0174 ↗
19. 10.1177/1528083725135675710.1177/15280837251356757 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-025-00950-z10.1007/s12221-025-00950-z ↗
21. 10.3390/pr1303076410.3390/pr13030764 ↗
22. 10.1080/00405000.2024.235125210.1080/00405000.2024.2351252 ↗
23. 10.1155/ijps/208050510.1155/ijps/2080505 ↗
24. Babaarslan O, Habib A, Celayir E. Production and Performance of Quad-Core-Spun Hybrid Yarn and Its Impact on Fabric. Fibers and Polymers 2026; 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-026-01449-x
25. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2939210.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29392 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4017010.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40170 ↗
27. 10.1201/978042948656210.1201/9780429486562 ↗
28. Klein W Stalder H. A practical guide to ring spinning 1987.
29. 10.1080/0040500070157053410.1080/00405000701570534 ↗
30. 10.1080/0040500070167963210.1080/00405000701679632 ↗
31. 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V67I11P22610.14445/22315381/IJETT-V67I11P226 ↗
32. Simegnaw A. Study of the Effects of Number of Sliver Doubling in Draw Frame Sliver Roving and Carded Yarn Quality 2019.
33. Saha ASK, Hossen BJ. Optimization of doubling at draw frame for quality of carded ring yarn. International Journal of Engineering & Technology IJETIJENS 2011; 11(06): 75–80.
34. 10.1080/0040516000868888710.1080/00405160008688887 ↗
35. 10.1177/0040517525138395410.1177/00405175251383954 ↗
36. Krishnan KB, Balamuralikrishna T, Chellamani P, et al. Studies on autolevellers in draw frame. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 1994; 19: 1.
37. 10.1177/004051750708767710.1177/0040517507087677 ↗
38. 10.1177/004051751456372410.1177/0040517514563724 ↗
39. Lord PR (ed). Handbook of yarn production: Technology, science and economics. Elsevier, 2003.
40. Gene FF, Powell JD, Emami-Naeini A. Feedback control of dynamic systems. Pearson, 2015.
41. Ogata K. Modern control engineering. Prentice Hall, 2010.
42. 10.1088/1742-6596/1074/1/01215510.1088/1742-6596/1074/1/012155 ↗
43. Sarathkumar D Raj RA Ratchagan P et al. A Real Time Data Monitoring for Spinning Mill Using IOT. In: 2024 IEEE 13th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT) 2024 April pp. 380–386. IEEE.10.1109/CSNT60213.2024.10545942 ↗
44. Devi TK, Mohan MM, Baluprithviraj KN, et al. IOT Based Moisture Measurement and Conveyor Belt Monitoring in Yarn Mill. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2022, (Vol. 2325, No. 1, p. 012009), August.
45. 10.1080/00405167.2020.176370110.1080/00405167.2020.1763701 ↗
46. Le TM, Tran HM, Wang K, et al. An Internet of Things-Integrated Deep Learning Model for Fault Diagnosis in Industrial Rotating Machines. IEEE Access 2025.
47. Carvalho V Soares F Vasconcelos R et al. A comparative study between yarn diameter and yarn mass variation measurement systems using capacitive and optical sensors 2008.
48. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.01010.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.010 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00138-012-0411-y10.1007/s00138-012-0411-y ↗
50. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101217-8.00006-310.1016/B978-0-08-101217-8.00006-3 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.02810.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.028 ↗
52. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.297296710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2972967 ↗
53. 10.1108/RJTA-09-2015-002710.1108/RJTA-09-2015-0027 ↗
54. Barthau M, Liewald M, Christian H. Improved process robustness by using closed lo control in deep drawing applications. In: Journal of physics: conference series. IOP Publishing, 2017, September, Vol. 896, No. 1, p. 012040.
55. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.32110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.321 ↗
56. Chu et al. Online sliver monitor 2002. (Patent No. WO1999034044A1).
57. 10.1016/j.aej.2013.09.00710.1016/j.aej.2013.09.007 ↗