journal article·2026-03Open access

A pilot evaluation of CAD-based 3D body-scan anthropometry for electrode-referenced measurements in smart clothing

Sojung Lee, Siyeon Kim, Daeyoung Lim, Wonyoung Jeong

Abstract

This pilot study evaluates the reliability and systematic bias of CAD-based 3D body-scan anthropometry (3DM) for electrode-referenced measurements in smart clothing applications. Anthropometric data from 24 male participants were obtained using both manual measurement (MM) and CAD-based analysis of 3D scan data across five dimensions relevant to EMG-enabled garments. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and agreement was examined through Bland–Altman analysis. The results demonstrated excellent reliability for all measurements (ICC > 0.9), indicating strong consistency between MM and 3DM. However, systematic biases were observed: 3DM underestimated biacromion length, primarily due to standardized scanning posture, and overestimated waist circumference, reflecting the absence of soft-tissue compression in non-contact scanning. In contrast, short surface paths between anatomical landmarks and electrode sites exhibited minimal bias and high agreement. These findings suggest that while CAD-based 3D scan anthropometry provides stable and reproducible electrode-referenced measurements, certain dimensions require careful interpretation due to posture- and curvature-related effects. This methodological evaluation establishes a foundation for the informed use of 3D scan–derived anthropometric data in future smart clothing and wearable system development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Muscle activation and electromyography studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Korea Institute of Industrial Technology

FITI Testing & Research Institute

Funding

Korea Institute of Industrial Technology

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.32098/mltj.02.2020.1910.32098/mltj.02.2020.19 ↗
2. Lynn SK, Watkins CM, Wong MA, et al. Validity and reliability of surface electromyography measurements from a wearable athlete performance system. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 2018; 17(2): 205–215.
3. 10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.6.109710.7741/rjcc.2015.23.6.1097 ↗
4. Kundu AS Mazumder O Bhaumik S. Design of wearable low power single supply surface EMG extractor unit for wireless monitoring. In: 2011 2nd international conference on nanotechnology and biosensors Visakhapatnam India 28–30 December 2011 paper no. 15 pp. 141–145. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
5. Konrad P. The ABC of EMG: A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography (Version 1.4). Noraxon U.S.A. Inc., 2006. ISBN 0-9771622-1-4.
6. 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.00210.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.002 ↗
7. 10.29049/rjcc.2011.19.6.134710.29049/rjcc.2011.19.6.1347 ↗
8. 10.5805/SFTI.2024.26.6.57310.5805/SFTI.2024.26.6.573 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-005-0307-310.1007/s00170-005-0307-3 ↗
10. 10.1108/1361202031048485210.1108/13612020310484852 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.01110.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.011 ↗
12. 10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/00710.1088/0967-3334/28/11/007 ↗
13. 10.3390/su1305265410.3390/su13052654 ↗
14. 10.5805/SFTI.2016.18.6.75510.5805/SFTI.2016.18.6.755 ↗
15. 10.70252/ZBVD110810.70252/ZBVD1108 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00138-019-01054-410.1007/s00138-019-01054-4 ↗
17. Nam Y, Choi K. Application of three-dimensional body scanning technology in the apparel industry. Fiber Technology and Industry 2002; 6(3/4): 218–227.
18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20685-1:2018—3-D scanning methodologies for internationally compatible anthropometric databases—Part 1: Evaluation protocol for body dimensions extracted from 3-D body scans. https://www.iso.org/standard/72087.html (2018).
19. 10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.8.119010.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.8.1190 ↗
20. Park S, Nam Y. A study on the accuracy verification of three-dimensional human body scan data: Focusing on the WB4 scanner by Cyberware. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume 2012; 14(1): 81–96.
21. 10.1108/1361202021042945810.1108/13612020210429458 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep2667210.1038/srep26672 ↗
23. Xia J, Istook CL, Williams G. Comparison of different body measurement techniques: 3D stationary scanner, 3D handheld scanner, and tape measurement. Textile Research Journal 2018; 88(12): 1389–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517697643
24. 10.3233/WOR-18268410.3233/WOR-182684 ↗
25. 10.5302/J.ICROS.2010.16.10.92710.5302/J.ICROS.2010.16.10.927 ↗
26. Griffin L Compton C Dunne LE. An analysis of the variability of anatomical body references within ready-to-wear garment sizes. In: 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Heidelberg Germany 12-16 September 2016 pp. 84-91. ACM.10.1145/2971763.2971800 ↗
27. Qi X, Song H, Xu X, et al. Human body dimensions extraction from 3D scan data. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics 2011; 4(1): 80–85. https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbi03201109
28. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, et al. European recommendations for surface electromyography, results of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development, 1999. ISBN 90-75452-15-2.
29. 10.1007/BF0095224310.1007/BF00952243 ↗
30. 10.1186/1476-5918-5-710.1186/1476-5918-5-7 ↗
31. 10.11613/BM.2015.01510.11613/BM.2015.015 ↗
32. 10.1108/EUM000000000728310.1108/EUM0000000007283 ↗
33. 10.1080/0040500000865953610.1080/00405000008659536 ↗
34. 10.15171/jlms.2017.0510.15171/jlms.2017.05 ↗
35. Hashemi-Nejad N, Choobineh A, Baneshi MR, et al. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in direct anthropometry. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene 2013; 5(2): 6–11.
36. 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.05210.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.052 ↗
37. 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.28410.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 ↗
38. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Ltd, 2005.