journal article·2025-05Open access

Sol-gel derived nano-array structures on plant fibers: Nucleation and growth mechanisms

Xuan Liu

Abstract

Nano-arrays deposition has emerged as a powerful strategy for enhancing the surface and mechanical properties of plant fibers. However, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the underlying relationship between nano-array formation and deposition conditions. In this study, the complex interactions between the surface characteristics of plant fibers and the sol-gel process parameters are elaborated, providing insights into the mechanisms driving in-situ nucleation and growth dynamics of nano-arrays. For the fiber surface, the introduced carboxymethyl groups and the concave morphology facilitate the heterogeneous deposition of nano-arrays by strengthening the interaction between the fibers and the deposited structures, creating ideal deposition sites for the layer-by-layer self-assembly of nano-arrays. In the sol-gel process, the precursor concentration acts as the driving force for heterogeneous nucleation and growth of nano-arrays. The catalyst concentration influences the morphologies of nano-structures, dictating whether thin nano-gels, well-aligned nano-arrays, or aggregated nano-particles. The reaction time determines the nucleation and growth cycles of nano-arrays. In this case, the well-aligned SiO 2 nano-arrays are deposited on the carboxymethyl pre-treated jute fibers in the ethanol/water solution containing 0.60 mol/L ammonia (catalyst) and 0.08 mol/L TEOS (precursor) for 6 h. Through the grey relational analysis, the influence of these three factors on particle size follows this order: reaction time < precursor concentration < catalyst concentration. The relationship between the surface features of plant fibers and sol-gel parameters enables the formation of well-aligned nano-arrays that effectively repair surface defects, ensuring precise control over the efficient fabrication of plant fibers with significantly enhanced properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Naval University of Engineering

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13517510.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135175 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10815110.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108151 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10825410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108254 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11157110.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111571 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13826510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138265 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.13210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.132 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11439210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114392 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.055 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12699810.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126998 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00289-023-04733-510.1007/s00289-023-04733-5 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42114-017-0020-310.1007/s42114-017-0020-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13531010.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135310 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12890010.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128900 ↗
14. 10.3390/nano1216276510.3390/nano12162765 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14196610.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141966 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122803 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11071910.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110719 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11386510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113865 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15794210.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157942 ↗
20. 10.1021/am506272c10.1021/am506272c ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.07.03110.1016/j.jmst.2024.07.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10895110.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108951 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15774110.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157741 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.75310.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.753 ↗
25. 10.1002/srin.20220020310.1002/srin.202200203 ↗
26. 10.3390/jcs801002010.3390/jcs8010020 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2696210.1002/pc.26962 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11143110.1016/j.matdes.2022.111431 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.00210.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.07210.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.072 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.06310.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.063 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0169310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01693 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60025-510.1016/S1005-0302(12)60025-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.12634010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126340 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.05.02410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.05.024 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10986510.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109865 ↗
37. 10.1039/B807760F10.1039/B807760F ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.00810.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.008 ↗
39. 10.1021/cr030027b10.1021/cr030027b ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.04.00410.1016/j.solmat.2011.04.004 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41467-020-14719-w10.1038/s41467-020-14719-w ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.06810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.068 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.02410.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.024 ↗
44. Dalod ARM, Grendal OG, Skjærvø SL, et al. Controlling oriented attachment and in situ functionalization of TiO2 nanoparticles during hydrothermal synthesis with APTES. J Phys Chem 2017; 121: 11897–11906.
45. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-082720-10094710.1146/annurev-physchem-082720-100947 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.10710.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.107 ↗