Analysis of the strength of joints in fabric/ unsaturated polyester composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Fabric/unsaturated polyester composites have garnered significant attention due to their lightweight properties and superior mechanical characteristics. Despite these advantages, the strength of joints within these composites remains a crucial aspect requiring thorough investigation. This paper presents a study focused on comprehending the factors that influence joint strength in fabric/polymer composites, emphasizing the importance of effective load transfer and robust adhesion within the fabric/polymer matrix. The objective is to minimize stress concentration and enhance load distribution within the joint. The failure mechanism involves a combination of Bearing Failure and shear-out failure, particularly in single-fabric layer composites. The study establishes a linear relationship between composite bending stiffness and the enforcement fabric’s flexural rigidity. A comparison of tensile properties across various joining methods, such as bolts, adhesive bonding, and tongue grooves, reveals that bolt joints exhibit the highest strength and elongation, followed by tongue groove joints. Notably, bolt joints demonstrate elevated toughness, efficiency, and stiffness in samples of two-layer twill fabric when the twill lines are oriented perpendicular to each other. Under these conditions, joint properties are measured at 0.89%, 14804.65 Nm, and 20.46 J, respectively. Increased fabric flexural rigidity yields advantages in terms of load distribution, load transfer efficiency, and dimensional stability. This study deepens the understanding of factors influencing joint strength, contributing valuable insights for the development of optimized joint designs and manufacturing processes. These advancements aim to enhance the performance and reliability of fabric/unsaturated polyester composites in applications requiring high strength and structural integrity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Alexandria University
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Siddique A, Iqbal Z, Nawab Y, et al. Joining techniques play a pivotal role in the successful implementation of composite materials in these applications, ensuring they meet performance and safety requirements. J of Thermo Compos Mater 2022; 36(8): 1–2.
2. Rajak D, Pagar D, Menezes P, et al. Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: manufacturing, properties, and applications. Poly 2019; 11(1667): 1667.
3. Messler R. Joining composite materials and structures: some thought-provoking possibilities. J of Thermo 2004; 17(1): 51–52.
4. 10.3390/ma1306128410.3390/ma13061284 ↗
5. Monteiro S, de Assis F, Ferreira C, et al. Fique fabric: a promising reinforcement for polymer composites. Poly 2018; 10(246): 1–2.
6. 10.1007/s10853-021-06177-610.1007/s10853-021-06177-6 ↗
7. 10.1177/089270570404518710.1177/0892705704045187 ↗
8. 10.1080/15440478.2020.185627110.1080/15440478.2020.1856271 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.03410.1016/j.procir.2016.05.034 ↗
10. Galinska A, Galinski C. Mechanical joining of fibre reinforced polymer composites to metals-a review. Part II: riveting, clinching, non-adhesive form-locked joints, pin and loop joining. Poly 2020; 12(1681): 1–2.
11. Banea M, da Silva L. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: anoverview. J of Mater Des and Applic 2009; 223(223): 1–2.
12. 10.1186/s40563-020-00131-610.1186/s40563-020-00131-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.00610.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.006 ↗
14. Kah M, Suoranta R, Martikainen J, et al. Techniques for joining dissimilar materials: metals and polymers. Mater Sci 2014; 36: 152–153.
15. 10.1177/1528083722114203510.1177/15280837221142035 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11218410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112184 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.005 ↗
18. Banea M, Silva L. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. J of Mater Des 2009; 223: 1–2.
19. 10.1080/01694243.2018.154352810.1080/01694243.2018.1543528 ↗
20. ASTM D1059-17. Standard Test Method for Yarn Number Based on Short-Length Specimens, 2022. https://www.astm.org/d1059-17r22.html
21. ASTM D3775-17e1. Standard Test Method for End (Warp) and Pick (Filling) Count of Woven Fabrics, 2023. https://www.astm.org/d3775-17r23.html
22. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Thickness of Textile Materials, 2019. https://www.astm.org/d1777-96r19.html
23. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Breaking Strength and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Strip Test), 2021. https://www.astm.org/d5035-11r19.html
24. 10.1177/152808371774733510.1177/1528083717747335 ↗
25. ASTM D3039/D3039M-08. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, 2014. https://www.astm.org/d3039_d3039m-08.html
26. ASTM D7264/D7264M-21. Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, 2021. https://www.astm.org/d7264_d7264m-21.html
27. ASTM D5961/D5961M-17. Standard Test Method for Bearing Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates, 2023. https://www.astm.org/d5961_d5961m-23.html
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.066 ↗
29. Vishnupriya A, Anil B, Kumar S. Investigation of joints in 3d spacer fabric composites. Int J Curr Eng Technol Spec 2014; 2: 287.
30. 10.1088/1757-899X/848/1/01208810.1088/1757-899X/848/1/012088 ↗
31. 10.1177/004051751141628210.1177/0040517511416282 ↗
32. Ismail S. Machinability analysis of drilling-induced damage on fiber reinforced composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Portsmouth: The University of Portsmouth, 2017.
33. 10.1177/002029401985810710.1177/0020294019858107 ↗
34. 10.1177/1528083721100861610.1177/15280837211008616 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma705380210.3390/ma7053802 ↗
36. Galińska A. Mechanical joining of fibre reinforced polymer composites to metals—a review. Part I: bolted joining. Poly 2020; 12(10): 2252.
37. Jadee KJ. Progressive failure analysis and failure map into plain weave glass fibre reinforced polymer bolted joint. Ameri J of Mater Sci and Eng 2015; 3(2): 21–28.
38. 10.1177/002199830809199710.1177/0021998308091997 ↗
39. 10.1177/002199830606706810.1177/0021998306067068 ↗
40. 10.3390/civileng304006010.3390/civileng3040060 ↗
41. Virupaksha V. Behavior of Fastened and Adhesively Bonded Composites under Mechanical and Thermomechanical Loads. Rochester, MI: Oakland University, 2008.
42. 10.1177/07316844980170030210.1177/073168449801700302 ↗
43. 10.1177/002199831561520410.1177/0021998315615204 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
45. 10.3390/polym1201004010.3390/polym12010040 ↗
46. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90146-H10.1016/0263-8223(93)90146-H ↗
47. 10.14429/dsj.69.1334810.14429/dsj.69.13348 ↗
48. 10.1177/0021998322112590610.1177/00219983221125906 ↗
49. ASTM. Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2007.