journal article·2023-09Open access

Research of composite resistance and design of the test matrix of low-speed impacts

Ju Qiu

Abstract

In this paper, low-velocity impact resistance for composite laminates is introduced. The resistance function for the parameters of low-velocity impact performs 2-order Taylor’s series expansion. The orthogonal design and Latin hypercube design are presented and their strongpoint and shortcoming are also indicated. The low-velocity impact simulation model of the composite plate is established. The computed results are compared with the existing standard test from ASTM D7136M-05 and the simulation parameters of the model are modified. By calculating and analyzing typical honeycomb sandwich models with different configurations, the damage-area resistance is extracted from the results. The discrete and abstract variables are treated as continuous integer variables to fit the resistance formula of the composite material. Response surface approximation is used to form a hyper surface formula for parameters. The sensitivity analysis of it reveals that the two most influential factors, related to the resistance definition, which is convenient for the subsequent structural design of the composites. In contrast to the previously defined Taylor’s series expansion, the initial coefficients of the resistance formula are obtained. The resistance hyper surface function obtained from the simulation data is used to design the 7-point low-speed impact tests using Latin hypercube design, which employed to verify and validate the simulations, for purposes of saving on the cost of testing and improving the accuracy of analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Structures and Composite Materials, COMAC Beijing Aircraft Technology Research Institute, Beijing, China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.02.01610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.02.016 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.07510.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.075 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.004 ↗
5. 10.1080/07370652.2020.179911510.1080/07370652.2020.1799115 ↗
6. 10.1177/146442072095281310.1177/1464420720952813 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10844510.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108445 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10766510.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107665 ↗
9. 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2008.05.00310.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2008.05.003 ↗
10. Shen Z · Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica · 2004 · 21 · 140
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10907810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109078 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11007710.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110077 ↗
14. 10.1177/095440892094369010.1177/0954408920943690 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-319-77767-2_1710.1007/978-3-319-77767-2_17 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10489-018-1164-810.1007/s10489-018-1164-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.11436610.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114366 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.01010.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.010 ↗
19. 10.5293/IJFMS.2017.10.3.24010.5293/IJFMS.2017.10.3.240 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168442097064310.1177/0731684420970643 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10784310.1016/j.tws.2021.107843 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.032 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.093 ↗
26. Cherniaev A, Montesano J, Butcher C. Modeling the axial crush response of CFRP tubes using MAT054, MAT058 and MAT262 in LS-DYNA®. In: 15th international LS-DYNA® users conference, Dearborn, MI, 10–12 June 2018, pp.1–17.
27. Nishi M · Modeling and validation of failure behaviors of composite laminate components using MAT_262 and user defined cohesive model · 2020 · 1
28. Maimi P · Mech Mater · 2007 · 39 · 39
29. LSTC. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual volume ii version 971 R6.1. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2012, pp. 805–808.
30. Zhou J. Numerical simulation study on bird strike dynamic response of composite honeycomb sandwich panel. Tianjin, China: College of Aeronautical Engineering of Civil Aviation University of China, 2017, p. 43.
31. Meng L. Impact failure mechanism and absorption energy distribution of aircraft honeycomb sandwich structure. Taiyuan, China: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2011, p. 26.
32. 10.1162/evco_a_0024110.1162/evco_a_00241 ↗