Numerical analysis of crimping behaviour of triaxial braided structures
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical properties of tubular braided structures influence their inherent performance during application as biomedical materials. In their use as stents, braided structures are forced to conform to the topology of the host tissues. Triaxial braided structures have had limited use in tissue repair and organ support even though they have the potential of offering equal if not better performance compared to bi-axial braided structures. A study of the mechanical dynamics of tri-axial braids would be crucial in the potential design of customised structures for advanced tissue repair and organ support. This study therefore uses Finite Element Methods (FEM) to design and develop triaxial braided structures and investigate their crimping behaviour using parametric modeling and numerical analysis in their potential application as biomedical materials. The results in this study portrayed that the presence of axial yarns in tubular braided structure offers improved performance in terms of stability of the structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Cellular and Composite Structures · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Manufacturing, School of Engineering, Industrial and Textile Engineering, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
Department of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00001-610.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00001-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-307-2.00001-410.1016/B978-1-78242-307-2.00001-4 ↗
3. Bottome KJ. · 2005
4. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.018 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.400578810.1115/1.4005788 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.006 ↗
7. 10.1080/1364570000916965410.1080/13645700009169654 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10439-018-1990-110.1007/s10439-018-1990-1 ↗
9. Conti M. Finite element analysis of self-expanding braided Wirestent . Master’s thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, www-2.unipv.it/compmech/. dissertations/conti.pdf (2007, accessed 21 July 2020).
10. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.10984110.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109841 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.029 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.00810.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.008 ↗
13. De Beule M · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2010 · 24 · 19
14. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10354910.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103549 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.05110.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.051 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.02310.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.02510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.025 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8TA10964H10.1039/C8TA10964H ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c0196110.1021/acsami.1c01961 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.017 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000036910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000369 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.04410.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.044 ↗
24. ABAQUS. Analysis user’s manual. Version 6.12. Johnston, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia, Inc., 2012.
25. pyFormex, www.nongnu.org/pyformex/doc-0.9/examples.html (accessed 7 April 2020).
26. 10.4236/jbise.2020.13600910.4236/jbise.2020.136009 ↗
27. 10.1177/004051751665110610.1177/0040517516651106 ↗
28. Ochola J. Mechanical modeling of tubular biomechanical textile structures for repair of ruptured and degenerated tendons . Belgium: Ghent University, 2016.
29. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-001610.1515/ntrev-2019-0016 ↗
30. 10.1002/jab.77004011110.1002/jab.770040111 ↗
31. Shanahan C. Viscoelastic braided stent: finite element analysis and validation of crimping behaviour. University of Limerick, Ireland, http://hdl.handle.net/10344/6111 (2017, accessed 27 December 2020).
32. 10.1177/152808371665446910.1177/1528083716654469 ↗
33. Zhao F, Xue W., Wang F, Sun J, Lin J, Liu L, Sun K, and Wang L. (2019) Braided bioresorbable cardiovascular stents mechanically reinforced by axial runners. Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials 89: 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.003 ↗
34. Jaziri H, Mokhtar S, Abdessalem SB, et al. Behavior of polymeric braided vascular stents under cyclic loading. In: The Fiber Society’s Fall 2019. Technical meeting and conference revitalizing the textile industry through innovative research, education, and entrepreneurship, Austin, USA, 28–30 October 2019 Paper no. hal-03106618.
35. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.00510.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.005 ↗
36. 10.1080/0040500970865852810.1080/00405009708658528 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.025 ↗
38. Kyosev Y and Aurich M (2016) Investigations about the braiding angle and the cover factor of the braided fabrics using Image Processing and Symbolic Math Toolbox of Matlab. In Advances in Braiding Technology , Yordan Kyosev (eds), Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam. 549–569, ISBN 9780081009260, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00023-510.1016/B978-0-08-100407-4.00023-5 ↗
39. Rebelo R, Vila N, Fangueiro R, Carvalho S and Rana S (2015) Influence Of Design Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior And Porosity of Braided Fibrous Stents. Materials and Design 86: 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.051.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.051 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12289-020-01541-410.1007/s12289-020-01541-4 ↗