Effect of structural parameters, knotting methods, and wet state on the tensile properties of sutures for orthopedic surgery
Source abstract
Abstract
With the popularity of sports and fitness, the chances of sports injuries for people have increased. Orthopedic sutures play an important role in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) yarns, with excellent tensile, compressive, impact strength, abrasion resistance, and chemical stability, are competitive materials for the preparation of sutures, but the tensile properties of sutures in knotted and wet environments are more informative in practical applications. In this paper, the effects of different structural parameters, knotting methods, and environments on the physical properties of nonabsorbable UHMWPE sutures, including appearance, breaking force, and breaking elongation, were investigated. The results showed that sutures with circular cross-sections had the best tensile properties; the loop knot gave the suture the greatest breaking strength, but also the smallest elongation, and the more complex the knot, the greater the elongation of the suture; dry and wet conditions have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of sutures. It is expected that this study will provide theoretical support for the optimal design of sutures and provide a basis for doctors to choose the knotting method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Engineering Technology and Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangnan University
Funding
National Nature Science Funds of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s13018-016-0451-510.1186/s13018-016-0451-5 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00167-010-1186-110.1007/s00167-010-1186-1 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1105090110.3390/polym11050901 ↗
4. 10.1080/0894193070123592410.1080/08941930701235924 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.b.3113610.1002/jbm.b.31136 ↗
6. 10.1017/S002572730001846910.1017/S0025727300018469 ↗
7. Hockenberger A, Karaca E. Effect of suture structure on knot performance of polyamide sutures. Indian Journal of Fiber & Textile Research 2004; 29(3): 271–277.
8. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.07010.1016/j.msec.2017.02.070 ↗
9. 10.2147/IJN.S14884510.2147/IJN.S148845 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1507257310.3390/ma15072573 ↗
11. 10.3233/BME-13075710.3233/BME-130757 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.01010.1016/j.knee.2012.11.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.01310.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.013 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.08.01910.1016/j.arthro.2006.08.019 ↗
15. 10.1002/jor.2218510.1002/jor.22185 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.rbo.2018.02.00110.1016/j.rbo.2018.02.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.01410.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.01010.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.010 ↗
19. 10.1177/036354650933281610.1177/0363546509332816 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.01010.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1939110.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19391 ↗
22. 10.1155/2014/59898610.1155/2014/598986 ↗
23. Debbabi F, Abdessalem B. Modelling and experimental investigation of mechanical performances of braided polyamide sutures. Indian Journal of Fiber & Textile Research 2018; 43(2): 186–193.
24. Ding J, Chen G, Huang W, et al. Tensile strength statistics and fracture mechanism of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fibers: on the weibull distribution. ACS Omega 2024; 9(11): 12984–12991.
25. 10.1177/004051752091247810.1177/0040517520912478 ↗
26. Debbabi F, Abdessalem S. Mechanical performances of double layer braided polyester sutures intended for orthopedic surgery. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2024; 49(1): 42–49.
27. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.10548610.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105486 ↗