Structural design and mechanical properties of glass fiber weft-knitted biaxial tubular fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to design glass fiber weft-knitted biaxial tubular (WKBT) fabric with the excellent dimensional stability and outstanding mechanical properties, six kinds of WKBT fabrics were prepared by four kinds of knitting structures (1 + 1 rib structure, face plating structure, back plating structure and face and back plating structure) and two kinds of stitch yarns (polyester and polytetrafluoroethylene fiber). The tensile properties, tearing properties and bursting tearing properties of WKBT fabrics with different binding tightness were investigated. The results showed that the failure of WKBT fabric was composed of the breakage of insertion yarns and the breakage of knitting structures. The tightness of knitting structures have significant effect on the mechanical properties of WKBT fabric. Compared with 1 + 1 rib structure, the plating structure affects the mechanical properties of WKBT fabrics by improving the weft density, binding tightness and dimensional stability. The kind of stitch yarn is another factor that affects the mechanical properties of WKBT fabrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Research Center for Knitting Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
College of Textile and Clothing, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · 2022 Jiangsu Province Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Program Project
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhou MM · Textil Res J · 2021 · 92 · 1611
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.05110.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.051 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.023 ↗
5. Mao HW · J Ind Text · 2021 · 51 · 4231S
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.029 ↗
7. 10.1080/00405000.2018.149233910.1080/00405000.2018.1492339 ↗
8. Qi YX · Acta Mater Compos Sin · 2020 · 37 · 1081
9. 10.3390/ma1222369310.3390/ma12223693 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12221-014-0382-x10.1007/s12221-014-0382-x ↗
11. 10.1007/s12221-013-1006-610.1007/s12221-013-1006-6 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12221-014-1288-310.1007/s12221-014-1288-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.046 ↗
14. Zhao Z · Compos Sci Technol · 2012 · 42
15. 10.1177/073168441557798510.1177/0731684415577985 ↗
16. 10.1080/09243046.2019.163901610.1080/09243046.2019.1639016 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12221-021-0447-610.1007/s12221-021-0447-6 ↗
18. Zhao ZY · J Ind Text · 2021 · 51 · 7714S
19. Chen NL · J Donghua Univ · 2002 · 28 · 105
20. Gao Z · Indian J Fibre Text · 2014 · 39 · 122
21. 10.1007/s12221-013-1953-y10.1007/s12221-013-1953-y ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.017 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.4607410.1002/app.46074 ↗
24. Zhang YM · Knitting Industries · 2005 · 11