Impact of post-industrial and post-consumer waste on the characteristics of denim fabric made from recycled yarns
Source abstract
Abstract
Post-consumer waste has garnered attention for its potential to promote sustainability, minimize environmental impact, conserve resources, and generate economic opportunities. This study investigated the use of post-industrial waste (PIW) and post-consumer cotton waste (PCW) in denim by turning it into yarn and combining with virgin cotton to study the mechanical and in-service properties. Open-end rotor spinning was used to produce yarns for fabric manufacturing. There were four warp yarns of 98 Tex having yarn compositions i.e., 100% Virgin Cotton, 100% PIW Cotton, PIW: Virgin cotton (70:30), PIW: PCW (70:30) cotton and two weft yarns of 58 Tex having yarn composition 100% Virgin cotton and 100% PIW cotton and a total of four warp-weft yarn combinations were employed to produce the fabric. Resultantly, the fabrics made were having overall composition 100 % virgin cotton, 100% PIW, 50% virgin and 50% PIW, and 80% PIW and 20% PCW. The fiber results show that the strength, uniformity and fiber length reduce from virgin, PIW and PCW, respectively. Open-end rotor spun made with different percentages of PIW and PCW has comparable hairiness and fiber release to virgin cotton. This suggests post-industrial and post-consumer waste yarn could be used to make denim without compromising the quality of fabric. The mechanical testing results of the fabric show a modest decline compared to virgin cotton fabrics. Still, these properties were acceptable for denim manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering, School of Engineering & Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Funding
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.26610.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 ↗
2. 10.1080/00405000.2018.143411310.1080/00405000.2018.1434113 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.00610.1016/j.spc.2023.01.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00002-210.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00002-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00003-410.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00003-4 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405000.2021.195442810.1080/00405000.2021.1954428 ↗
7. Lu JJ · 2014 · 122
8. Contin B · Mater Circ Econom · 2022 · 4 · 1110.1007/s42824-021-00048-w ↗
9. 10.3390/fib1009007610.3390/fib10090076 ↗
10. Mezarcıöz S · J. Nat Fiber · 2021
11. Jamshaid H · Clean Eng Technol · 2021 · 5 · 1
12. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.03310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.033 ↗
13. 10.21467/jmm.8.1.52-6610.21467/jmm.8.1.52-66 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1127510.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11275 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2544410.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25444 ↗
16. Aypar A · Rev Mater · 2024 · 29 · 1
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15879810.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158798 ↗
18. Fidan F · J Clean Prod · 2021 · 287
19. 10.1177/0040517522109097110.1177/00405175221090971 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c0049810.1021/acs.estlett.0c00498 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.06210.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.062 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11599810.1016/j.envpol.2020.115998 ↗
23. Béchir W · TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON · 2018 · 28 · 11
24. 10.4236/jtst.2016.2300710.4236/jtst.2016.23007 ↗
25. 10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/01205710.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012057 ↗
26. 10.1177/00405175750450050510.1177/004051757504500505 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.10041510.1016/j.cscee.2023.100415 ↗
28. Choudhary A · Trends in Text. Eng. Fash. Technol · 2018 · 1 · 11
29. El-Banna M, Nassar M, El-Bagoury M, et al. Evaluation of Egyptian cotton variety (Giza 90) and promising cotton cross for yarn characters. 2019.
30. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0853210.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08532 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2021.198283710.1080/15440478.2021.1982837 ↗
32. 10.1108/RJTA-09-2019-004310.1108/RJTA-09-2019-0043 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.10990110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109901 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.05710.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.057 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.02510.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025 ↗
36. Arora A · Int J Sci Basic Appl Res · 2020 · 20 · 9
37. 10.1177/00405175590290070910.1177/004051755902900709 ↗
38. Ukponmwan JO · 1998 · 1
39. Kathirvelu S · Annals of the university of oradea, fascicle of textiles · 2018 · 93
40. 10.1108/0955622081089889010.1108/09556220810898890 ↗
41. 10.1177/004051750707878710.1177/0040517507078787 ↗
42. Jiang L · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2023 · 18
43. Islam S · J. Text. Polym · 2019 · 7 · 1
44. 10.3390/coatings1203040810.3390/coatings12030408 ↗