journal article·2022-06Open access

Development of scheme to evaluate the performance of parachute canopy fabrics under tensile impact

Gyana R Behera, Arunangshu Mukhopadhyay, Monica Sikka

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 2_suppl

Abstract

The present research is an extension of the earlier work wherein a wider scheme of small-scale tensile impact testing is proposed, to characterise the whole parachute canopy instead of full-scale wind tunnel testing. The drop height for equivalent tensile impact on the rectangular stitched specimens is chosen as 300 mm, and accordingly, the dimension (Length × Width) has been decided (300 mm × 100 mm). To evaluate the performance of stitched specimen (at 45° bias angle), ungripped width of 20 mm on both sides of the specimen has been worked out. In the work, the actual payload responsible for parachute inflation has been addressed for the calculation of the exact opening shock force. Subsequently, to apply impact load on the specimen, dead weights are predicted based on the different levels of opening shock forces of the C-9 parachute canopy under different aerodynamic conditions. Considering a specific case, the behaviour of the ripstop and plain-woven fabric sample in terms of load versus extension curve and work done at the time of impact have been analysed under different loads using a high-speed digital camera. This study revealed that the plain-woven fabric is to be preferred for human dropping because it has a higher extension and higher impact duration than ripstop fabric. As a result, the plain-woven fabric will produce a lower impact or shock force in the parachute canopy which is to be transferred to the skydiver. On the other hand, ripstop fabric possesses higher strength, therefore can be preferred for materials dropping.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking · Winter Sports Injuries and Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Textile Technology, Dr BR Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, India

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Citoglu F · Int J Sci Environ Tech · 2017 · 6 · 3214
2. Duncan S · 2015 · A16
3. Maydew RC, Peterson CW. Design and testing of high-performance parachutes. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: AGARD; 1991, pp. 142–146.
4. 10.2514/6.1991-85810.2514/6.1991-858 ↗
5. Pope A, Coin KL. High-speed wind tunnel testing. New Mexico, NY. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1965, pp. 66–70.
6. Barlow JB, Rae WH, Pope. Low speed wind tunnel testing. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 1999, pp. 62–81.
7. 10.1177/152808371663133110.1177/1528083716631331 ↗
8. 10.1080/00405000.2017.131267410.1080/00405000.2017.1312674 ↗
9. 10.1177/152808371662913610.1177/1528083716629136 ↗
10. Knacke TW. Parachute recovery systems design manual. Santa Barbara, CA: Para Publishing, 1991, pp. 6–43.
11. Coplan MJ · 1956
12. Ross W, · 1968
13. Ludtke WP · Am Inst Aeronautics Astronautics · 1986 · 86 · 72
14. Agrawal DC · IOPScience · 2000 · 4 · 35
15. Krithiga R · Int J Pure Appl Maths · 2018 · 119 · 3083
16. Solt GC · 1963
17. Navathe PD · Aviat Space Environ Med · 2002 · 73 · 1106
18. Burton RR, Leverett SD, Michaelson ED. Man at High Sustained +Gz Acceleration. London, UK: Technical Editing and Reproduction Ltd., 1974, pp. 23–24.
19. Reid DH · Aerosp Med · 1971 · 42 · 1207
20. Davis JR, Johnson R, Stepanek J, et al. Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp. 83–99.
21. Schilling BK · J Sports Sci Med · 2008 · 7 · 299