Investigation of flexural performance of concrete beams with nonwoven/polymer composites versus steel-rebar reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
The research investigates the unique characteristics and benefits of using nonwoven fabrics and polymer I cross-section composites in concrete beams. These materials show improved strength, flexibility, and corrosion resistance compared to conventional steel-reinforced beams, offering promising solutions for various construction applications. This study constructed an I-beam structure using a nonwoven polyester fabric/polyester composite cast in a concrete beam. Other designs included woven carbon fabric or Kevlar nonwoven fabric applied to the bottom flange of the I-beam for reinforcement. The flexural behavior of an I-beam polyester nonwoven/polyester composite with Kevlar or carbon-reinforced concrete beams was examined. The comparison between the different samples indicates that: flexural strength: the carbon sheet-reinforced sample exhibits the highest flexural strength, followed by the steel rebar and Kevlar-reinforced samples. The ductility: The steel rebar-reinforced sample shows the highest ductility, indicating better deformation capacity before failure. Carbon sheet reinforcement also provides substantial ductility. Bending stiffness: The highest bending stiffness is observed in the Kevlar-reinforced sample, suggesting a stiffer and less flexible beam. These observations highlight the trade-offs between stiffness, strength, and ductility in reinforced concrete beams. The reinforcement material choice depends on the application-specific requirements, such as the need for higher bending strength, better flexibility, or greater stiffness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandri, Egypt
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/b1118110.1201/b11181 ↗
2. Pakravan H · 2011
3. Orr J · 2011
4. 10.1260/1369-4332.13.5.84910.1260/1369-4332.13.5.849 ↗
5. Pedreschi R · 2011
6. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0118910.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01189 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133) ↗
8. 10.1007/s40996-021-00718-410.1007/s40996-021-00718-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-0-08-103013-4.00011-X10.1016/B978-0-08-103013-4.00011-X ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:7(1652)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:7(1652) ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.053 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.052 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.16310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.163 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.047 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1995)7:4(239)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1995)7:4(239) ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(117)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(117) ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.003 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1317286210.3390/polym13172862 ↗
19. 10.5772/6601510.5772/66015 ↗
20. 10.1533/9780845699994.1.6910.1533/9780845699994.1.69 ↗
21. 10.3389/fmats.2023.125819510.3389/fmats.2023.1258195 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12091310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120913 ↗
23. 10.5772/316210.5772/3162 ↗
24. 10.1177/0021998322112718110.1177/00219983221127181 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1518382610.3390/polym15183826 ↗
26. 10.3390/buildings1306150910.3390/buildings13061509 ↗
27. 10.3390/buildings1310240610.3390/buildings13102406 ↗
28. Qureshi J · 2022
29. 10.1177/073168440708137710.1177/0731684407081377 ↗
30. 10.1186/s44147-021-00028-610.1186/s44147-021-00028-6 ↗
31. 10.1007/s42452-019-1373-810.1007/s42452-019-1373-8 ↗
32. Mohod MV · Int J Eng Sci · 2012 · 1 · 1
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11354010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113540 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.02810.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.028 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.006 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10186510.1016/j.jobe.2020.101865 ↗
37. Uriayer FA · 2021
38. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10575810.1016/j.istruc.2023.105758 ↗
39. Shen X, Li B, Chen Y-T, et al. (eds) Experimental and numerical study on reinforced concrete beam-column joints with diagonal bars: effects of bonding condition and diameter. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2022. Structures.10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.050 ↗
40. Ponniah R · 2021
41. Hind KM · Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology · 2016 · 3 · 48
42. 10.1680/jmacr.17.0048810.1680/jmacr.17.00488 ↗
43. Reddy BM · Int J Civ Eng Technol · 2017 · 8 · 1824
44. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11651410.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116514 ↗
45. 10.3390/su16051866.4610.3390/su16051866.46 ↗
46. 10.3390/cryst1111127210.3390/cryst11111272 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12918110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129181 ↗
48. El M · JIT · 2024 · 54 · 1
49. 10.1080/00405000.2020.173642310.1080/00405000.2020.1736423 ↗
50. Carmona JR, Carpinteri C, Ventura G. Failure modes of concrete beams part 1: a theoretical model. J Struct Eng; 108: 277–285.
51. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11200410.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112004 ↗
52. Behera BK · 2010
53. Assad M · Composites part C · 2024 · 13 · 100443
54. Toutanji HA · Construct Build Mater · 2006 · 20 · 27910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.021 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(18)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(18) ↗
56. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
57. Teng JG · Frontiers in Civil Engineering · 2007 · 1 · 193
58. 10.1617/s11527-016-0882-910.1617/s11527-016-0882-9 ↗