Auxetic metamaterials: A route to auxeticity in textile fibrous structures - potential application on protective apparel
Source abstract
Abstract
Auxetic fibrous structures represent an innovative class of metamaterials that exhibit a negative Poisson’s ratio, meaning they expand laterally when stretched and contract when compressed. This counterintuitive behaviour, which sets them apart from conventional materials, is achieved through various strategies, of which the use of specially developed auxetic yarns, unique patterns associated with common auxetic geometries, and specific material arrangements can be highlighted. The study of auxetic fibrous structures span a range of applications due to their enhanced mechanical properties, such as increased energy absorption, improved fracture resistance, and superior indentation resistance. This review examines the path of creation of auxetic fibrous structures, from auxetic yarns to knitted and woven designs, as well as reinforced fibrous structures, emphasizing the mechanical principles that drive their auxetic behaviour. Additionally, it explores the potential applications of these structures with special focus on protective garments. By summarizing recent progress and identifying significant challenges and trends, this review aims to provide a detailed understanding of the principles governing the auxetic behaviour of diverse fibrous structures and their relevance to protective apparel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Minho
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Plano de Recuperação e Resiliência
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 ↗
2. 10.1039/C6MH00065G10.1039/C6MH00065G ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11725410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117254 ↗
4. 10.1177/0040517523119343310.1177/00405175231193433 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443-021-09931-w10.1007/s10443-021-09931-w ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100904-8.00019-510.1016/B978-0-08-100904-8.00019-5 ↗
7. 10.1533/9780857090645.1.310.1533/9780857090645.1.3 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808371986504410.1177/1528083719865044 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-018-8627-810.1007/s12221-018-8627-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apm.2023.08.02410.1016/j.apm.2023.08.024 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.2718879/91778710.1063/1.2718879/917787 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.2912061/89619310.1063/1.2912061/896193 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0043410.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00434 ↗
14. Yeganeh-Haeri A, Weidner DJ, Parise JB. Elasticity of agr-cristobalite: a silicon dioxide with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Sci Technol Humanit 1992; 257: 650–652.
15. 10.1038/358222a010.1038/358222a0 ↗
16. 10.1039/C9BM01928F10.1039/C9BM01928F ↗
17. Santulli C, Langella C. Study and development of concepts of auxetic structures in bio-inspired design. Int J Sustain Des 2016; 3: 20.
18. 10.3813/AAA.91827610.3813/AAA.918276 ↗
19. Scarpa F Giacomin JA Bezazi A et al. Dynamic behavior and damping capacity of auxetic foam pads. Proc. SPIE 6169 Smart structures and materials 2006: Damping and isolation 2006 p. 61690T.10.1117/12.658453 ↗
20. 10.1002/ADMI.20220209210.1002/ADMI.202202092 ↗
21. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-710.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-7 ↗
22. 10.1002/pssb.20220032410.1002/pssb.202200324 ↗
23. 10.30765/er.205010.30765/er.2050 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11553010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115530 ↗
26. 10.1109/84.58578710.1109/84.585787 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00419005011710.1007/s004190050117 ↗
28. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00002-410.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00002-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
31. 10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3_2510.1007/978-981-10-6884-3_25 ↗
32. Bacigalupo A Lepidi M Gnecco G. Hierarchical hexachiral auxetics for large elasto-plastic deformation Optimal design of auxetic hexachiral metamaterials with local resonators 2019. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab1a22.10.1088/2053-1591/ab1a22 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11238110.1016/j.tws.2024.112381 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10369810.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103698 ↗
35. 10.1002/pssb.20077770410.1002/pssb.200777704 ↗
36. 10.1023/A:100678122400210.1023/A:1006781224002 ↗
37. 10.5040/9798216967644.000410.5040/9798216967644.0004 ↗
38. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac3f7810.1088/1361-665X/ac3f78 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1105072510.3390/ma11050725 ↗
40. 10.1088/0022-3727/22/12/01210.1088/0022-3727/22/12/012 ↗
41. 10.1002/pen.1132110.1002/pen.11321 ↗
42. 10.1002/pen.1045110.1002/pen.10451 ↗
43. 10.1179/14658010222500649510.1179/146580102225006495 ↗
44. Simkins VR Alderson A Davies PJ et al. Single fibre pullout tests on auxetic polymeric fibres.
45. 10.1002/pen.2031110.1002/pen.20311 ↗
46. 10.1002/pssb.20160007910.1002/pssb.201600079 ↗
47. 10.1002/pssb.20046038410.1002/pssb.200460384 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.016 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12221-018-8391-910.1007/s12221-018-8391-9 ↗
50. 10.1080/00405000.2021.192392810.1080/00405000.2021.1923928 ↗
51. 10.3390/ma1518630010.3390/ma15186300 ↗
52. Khalilur M, Khan R, Siddique AB, et al. Auxetic yarn: fundamentals, influencing parameters, application areas and challenges. Textile & Leather Review 2021; 4: 2623–6281.
53. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.025 ↗
54. 10.1002/pssb.20138423710.1002/pssb.201384237 ↗
55. Zhang GH Ghita O Evans KE. The fabrication and mechanical properties of a novel 3-component auxetic structure for composites 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.012.10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.012 ↗
56. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104906910.1080/00405000.2015.1049069 ↗
57. 10.3390/polym1002022610.3390/polym10020226 ↗
58. 10.1177/004051751772512510.1177/0040517517725125 ↗
59. 10.1177/152808372094111610.1177/1528083720941116 ↗
60. 10.1177/1528083722108254410.1177/15280837221082544 ↗
61. 10.1177/152808372097891810.1177/1528083720978918 ↗
62. 10.3390/cryst1206078110.3390/cryst12060781 ↗
63. 10.1080/15440478.2022.207032210.1080/15440478.2022.2070322 ↗
64. Wu R, Seo S, Ma L, et al. Full-fiber auxetic-interlaced yarn sensor for sign-language translation glove assisted by artificial neural network. Nanomicro Lett 2022; 14: 139.
65. 10.7216/teksmuh.136588910.7216/teksmuh.1365889 ↗
66. 10.1177/0040517523120252510.1177/00405175231202525 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.10199610.1016/j.apmt.2023.101996 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12221-023-00256-y10.1007/s12221-023-00256-y ↗
69. 10.2478/aut-2021-004510.2478/aut-2021-0045 ↗
70. 10.1002/ADMA.20220932110.1002/ADMA.202209321 ↗
71. 10.1177/0040517524127450610.1177/00405175241274506 ↗
72. Bossuyt F Beeby S Yang K et al. Electromechanical behavior of helical auxetic yarn strain sensor. DOI: 10.3390/engproc2023052011.10.3390/engproc2023052011 ↗
73. 10.1007/s12221-025-00910-710.1007/s12221-025-00910-7 ↗
74. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00007-310.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00007-3 ↗
75. 10.1002/pssb.20155203610.1002/pssb.201552036 ↗
76. 10.1088/2631-8695/abd1c810.1088/2631-8695/abd1c8 ↗
77. 10.1002/pssb.20160007210.1002/pssb.201600072 ↗
78. 10.1080/03602559.2014.98681210.1080/03602559.2014.986812 ↗
79. 10.3390/polym1106104010.3390/polym11061040 ↗
80. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00008-510.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00008-5 ↗
81. 10.1177/004051751773208610.1177/0040517517732086 ↗
82. 10.1002/pssb.20180016810.1002/pssb.201800168 ↗
83. 10.1177/0040517522109858710.1177/00405175221098587 ↗
84. 10.1177/004051751985184010.1177/0040517519851840 ↗
85. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00005-X10.1016/B978-0-08-102211-5.00005-X ↗
86. 10.1177/004051750934978810.1177/0040517509349788 ↗
87. 10.1177/004051751140459410.1177/0040517511404594 ↗
88. 10.1002/pssb.20138424010.1002/pssb.201384240 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.06310.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.063 ↗
90. 10.1557/jmr.2017.34010.1557/jmr.2017.340 ↗
91. 10.1177/002199832096455210.1177/0021998320964552 ↗
92. 10.1080/00405000.2017.136158210.1080/00405000.2017.1361582 ↗
93. 10.1080/00405000.2018.155735910.1080/00405000.2018.1557359 ↗
94. 10.3390/polym1410206510.3390/polym14102065 ↗
95. Madhurangi C Wijethunga C Lanarolle G. Influence of repeat unit size on the auxetic effect of foldable weft knitted fabrics MERCon 2022 - moratuwa engineering research conference proceedings 2022. DOI: 10.1109/MERCon55799.2022.9906292.10.1109/MERCon55799.2022.9906292 ↗
96. Yang T Ma Y Liu S et al. Characterization of negative Poisson’s ratio of two/three dimensional auxetic knitted fabric with PET/PA/cotton from folded structures. J Text Inst. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2023.2265247.10.1080/00405000.2023.2265247 ↗
97. 10.3390/textiles303001810.3390/textiles3030018 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.10195010.1016/j.tsep.2023.101950 ↗
99. 10.1080/00405000.2024.237549010.1080/00405000.2024.2375490 ↗
100. 10.1177/1528083724129573310.1177/15280837241295733 ↗