Discrete wavelet transform based processing of embroidered textile-electrode electromyography signal acquired with load and pressure effect
Source abstract
Abstract
The diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases is complicated by overlapping symptoms from other conditions. Textile-based surface electromyography (sEMG) of skeletal muscles, offer promising potential in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of various neuromuscular disorders. However, it is important to consider the impact of load and pressure on EMG signals, as this can significantly affect the signal’s accuracy. This study seeks to investigate the influence of load and pressure on EMG signals and establish a processing framework for these signals in the diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. The sEMG data were collected from healthy subjects using a textile electrode developed from polyester multi-filament conductive hybrid thread (CleverTex). The textrode was embroidered directly on an elastic bandage (Velcro® strap) placed on volunteer’s muscles while different activities were performed with varying loads and pressure. The collected data were pre-processed using standard techniques of the discrete wavelet transform to remove noise and artifacts. The performance of the proposed denoising algorithm was evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), percentage root mean square difference (PRD), and root mean square error (RMSE). Various signal processing approaches (filters) were considered and the results were compared with the proposed EMG noise reduction algorithms. Based on the experimental results, the fourth level of decomposition for the sym5 wavelets with the Rigrsure threshold method achieved the highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values of 16.69 and 21.91, for soft and hard thresholding functions, respectively. The SNR values of 22.11, 21.54, and 2.78 at three different pressure levels 5 mmHg, 10 mmHg, and 20 mmHg, respectively, indicate the superior performance of wavelet multiresolution filter in de-noising applications. The results of this study suggest that our methodology is effective, precise, and reliable for analysing sEMG data and provide insights into both physiological and pathological neuromuscular conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
School of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Scientific and Didactic Laboratory of Nanotechnology and Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Funding
Ethiopian Government
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Phinyomark A., Campbell E. and Scheme E. Surface Electromyography (EMG) Signal Processing, Classification, and Practical Considerations. In: Naik G. (ed) Biomedical Signal Processing: Advances in Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 3–29.10.1007/978-981-13-9097-5_1 ↗
2. 10.1088/1742-6596/1582/1/01208210.1088/1742-6596/1582/1/012082 ↗
3. 10.1109/jbhi.2020.298752810.1109/jbhi.2020.2987528 ↗
4. 10.3390/s13091243110.3390/s130912431 ↗
5. 10.1251/bpo11510.1251/bpo115 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.01410.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.014 ↗
7. Hugger S · Int J Comput Dent · 2013 · 16 · 119
8. 10.1007/s12652-020-01852-z10.1007/s12652-020-01852-z ↗
9. 10.1007/978-3-540-28637-0_5010.1007/978-3-540-28637-0_50 ↗
10. 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/05602110.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056021 ↗
11. 10.23919/CISTI.2019.876090810.23919/CISTI.2019.8760908 ↗
12. 10.1109/EECon52960.2021.958094910.1109/EECon52960.2021.9580949 ↗
13. 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.876598310.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765983 ↗
14. 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90166-510.1016/s0003-9993(96)90166-5 ↗
15. 10.3390/app1023875710.3390/app10238757 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41393-020-0470-210.1038/s41393-020-0470-2 ↗
17. Kapur A, Sarawgi U, Wadkins E, et al. Non-invasive silent speech recognition in multiple sclerosis with dysphonia. In: Dalca AV, McDermott MBA, Alsentzer E, (eds). Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 13 December 2020, pp. 25–38. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v116/kapur20a.html
18. 10.3390/app1110462510.3390/app11104625 ↗
19. 10.3389/fneur.2020.56036310.3389/fneur.2020.560363 ↗
20. 10.1109/jsen.2022.316598810.1109/jsen.2022.3165988 ↗
21. 10.7322/JHGD.V30.1036810.7322/JHGD.V30.10368 ↗
22. 10.1186/s13634-019-0632-610.1186/s13634-019-0632-6 ↗
23. 10.3390/s2309439710.3390/s23094397 ↗
24. Tuna BG · 2020 · 365
25. 10.3390/s2306292710.3390/s23062927 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.02710.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027 ↗
27. 10.5772/331510.5772/3315 ↗
28. 10.1088/0967-3334/17/2/00310.1088/0967-3334/17/2/003 ↗
29. 10.1016/s1050-6411(01)00033-510.1016/s1050-6411(01)00033-5 ↗
30. 10.1109/EITech.2017.825523210.1109/EITech.2017.8255232 ↗
31. 10.1109/i2ct51068.2021.941798410.1109/i2ct51068.2021.9417984 ↗
32. Ghofrani Jahromi Mp H · Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering · 2017 · 7 · 365
33. 10.1109/iccae.2009.5710.1109/iccae.2009.57 ↗
34. 10.18280/ts.38031610.18280/ts.380316 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.01110.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.011 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.01.00510.1016/j.artmed.2016.01.005 ↗
37. 10.1016/s1386-9477(00)00111-910.1016/s1386-9477(00)00111-9 ↗
38. 10.21037/ht-21-2310.21037/ht-21-23 ↗
39. 10.1155/2019/109729210.1155/2019/1097292 ↗
40. 10.1109/ICIINFS.2008.479841010.1109/ICIINFS.2008.4798410 ↗
41. 10.47893/IJEEE.2013.105810.47893/IJEEE.2013.1058 ↗
42. Misiti M · 1997
43. 10.1088/1741-2552/abc74110.1088/1741-2552/abc741 ↗