Analysis of cord stress during tire dynamic longitudinal slip
Source abstract
Abstract
Selected 215/55 R17 radial tires for material test to obtain relevant material parameters. Used these parameters to build a finite element model and conduct longitudinal slip simulation. The relationship between longitudinal force and slip rate at different speeds and loads was determined by tire longitudinal slip tests. Then the longitudinal slip simulation results were compared with the test results to verify the feasibility of the model. The circumferential and axial rebar force of the belt layer at different speeds and the extreme value of the circumferential rebar force on the reverse-envelope of different skeleton materials were analyzed. The results show that: in the static state, the cord force of the belt layer had shown a trend consistent with the direction of the cord arrangement. As the speed increased, the belt cord force exhibited significant fluctuations and asymmetry. The rebar force of the turn-up points on the belt and ply is significantly smaller compared to the fetal crown ply. The rebar force at the fetal crown and belt wrapping points at 60 km/h was smaller than at 40 km/h and 80 km/h. The cord force of the fetal crown ply and the belt ply is much more affected by the load than that of the ply.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China
Funding
Research Project of Xiamen University of Technology · Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province · The Natural Science Foundation of Xiamen
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3901/JME.2012.15.06510.3901/JME.2012.15.065 ↗
2. Li L · Special Rubber Products · 2016 · 37 · 38
3. Ge S · Mechanical Design and Manufacturing · 2014 · 07 · 233
4. Chen W · Rubber and Plastic Technology and Equipment · 2018 · 44 · 49
5. 10.2346/1.213525410.2346/1.2135254 ↗
6. 10.4236/wjet.2016.4202210.4236/wjet.2016.42022 ↗
7. 10.3901/JME.2021.12.06210.3901/JME.2021.12.062 ↗
8. 10.5545/sv-jme.2020.706810.5545/sv-jme.2020.7068 ↗
9. Zhou F · Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach · 2021 · 52 · 385
10. 10.1177/155892502091519510.1177/1558925020915195 ↗
11. Sun P · Shock Vib · 2019 · 2019 · 1
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.02910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.029 ↗
13. Baranowski P · Defense Technology, China Ordnance Society · 2020 · 3 · 520
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.12.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.12.028 ↗
15. Zemu C · 2018
16. Tan HF · Veh Syst Dyn · 2004 · 40 · 161