journal article·2022-06Open access

Influence of yarn hybridisation and fibre architecture on the compaction response of woven fabric preforms during composite manufacturing

Hussein Kommur Dalfi, Zeshan Yousaf, Erdem Selver, Prasad Potluri

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 3_suppl

Abstract

Fabric preforms undergo transverse compaction during composite manufacturing. This compaction changes the preform thickness, fibre volume fraction (FVF), tow geometry and voids for resin flow. In this paper, influence of yarn hybridisation and fibre architecture on the compaction response of woven fabric preforms has been studied. A series of cyclic compression tests have been carried out on both dry and wet preforms. The effect of hybridisation on compressibility has been investigated for single as well as multilayer fabrics. The influence of interlacement pattern (twill and satin fabrics) with hybrid yarns has also been investigated. Nesting efficiencies of multilayer stacks have been studied by utilising mechanical test results. Additionally, the meso-structure of single and multilayer fabrics under 1 bar pressure has been analysed using SEM images. It is observed that the thickness reduction for single layer twill hybrid fabric is 38% while thickness reduction for twill S-glass fabric is 67% at 100 kPa. Moreover, single layer hybrid twill fabrics have shown higher compressibility resistance (60% thickness reduction at 100 kPa) compared to single layer hybrid satin fabrics (which showed 67% thickness reduction at 100 kPa). Whereas opposite trend is observed for multilayer hybrid fabrics due to nesting effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Wasit, Wasit, Iraq

Department of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Faculty of Engineering, Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey

North West Composites Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-710.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.037 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.021 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b0224710.1021/acsami.6b02247 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.01010.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.027 ↗
11. 10.26701/ems.33478310.26701/ems.334783 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2532510.1002/pc.25325 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11108310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111083 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.005 ↗
15. Kamocka M, Mania RJ. Assessment methods of mechanical properties of composite materials. Mech Mech Eng 2017; 21: 1005–1018.
16. Durand LP. Composite materials research progress. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers, 2008.
17. Summerscales J, Searle TJ. Low-pressure (vacuum infusion) techniques for moulding large composite structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater Des Appl 2005; 219: 45–58.
18. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00179-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00179-1 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.1009110.1002/pc.10091 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.03610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.036 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10443-011-9217-810.1007/s10443-011-9217-8 ↗
22. 10.1080/1944702460865927910.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219983920260160110.1177/002199839202601601 ↗
24. 10.1177/00405175860560120810.1177/004051758605601208 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00092-410.1016/S1359-835X(97)00092-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01175-310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01175-3 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:100470160429910.1023/A:1004701604299 ↗
28. 10.1088/1757-899X/406/1/01206210.1088/1757-899X/406/1/012062 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.016 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.1054210.1002/pc.10542 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.008 ↗
32. Robitaille F and Gauvin R. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: Compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O-saturated woven reinforcements. Polymer Composites 1998; 19: 543–557.10.1002/pc.10128 ↗
33. 10.1177/152808371141639410.1177/1528083711416394 ↗
34. 10.1177/004051751142453310.1177/0040517511424533 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10443-016-9554-810.1007/s10443-016-9554-8 ↗
36. 10.1177/002199830303701200210.1177/0021998303037012002 ↗
37. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.410.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.4 ↗
38. AGY. S-2 glass yarns www.agy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/493_S-2_Yarn-Industrial.pdf (2017 accessed 27 May 2021).
39. Drake. Polypropylene www.drakeextrusionuk.com (2017 accessed 27 May 2021).
40. Selver E. Tow level hybridisation for damage tolerant composites. Manchester: University of Manchester, 2014.
41. Yousaf Z Potluri P Léonard F et al. Meso scale analysis of 2D glass woven preforms under compaction. In: ICCM19 Montreal Canada 28 July–2 August 2013. pp. 1–8.
42. Yousaf Z Potluri P Withers P. Deformation of single layer dry preforms under compaction. In: Investigation of deformation behaviour of dry textiles under forming forces by computed tomography PhD thesis University of Manchester 2018 p.64.
43. Yousaf Z Withers PJ and Potluri P. Compaction nesting and image based permeability analysis of multi-layer dry preforms by computed tomography (CT). Compos Struct 2021; 263: Article 113676.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113676 ↗
44. Yousaf Z Potluri P Withers P. Compaction and nesting in textile preforms influenced by tow architecture. In: Investigation of deformation behaviour of dry textiles under forming forces by computed tomography PhD thesis University of Manchester 2018 p.134.
45. Chen Z-R Ye L and Kruckenberg T. A micromechanical compaction model for woven fabric preforms. Part I: single layer. Compos Sci Technol 2006; 66: 3254–3262.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.028 ↗
46. 10.1177/004051751143585110.1177/0040517511435851 ↗
47. 10.1177/004051750708785110.1177/0040517507087851 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.017 ↗
49. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00038-910.1016/S1359-835X(97)00038-9 ↗
50. 10.1002/pc.75012010410.1002/pc.750120104 ↗
51. Yousaf Z Potluri P Léonard F et al. Meso scale analysis of 2D glass woven preforms under compaction. In: ICCM 19 Montreal Canada 28 July–2 August 2013.
52. 10.1177/073168441771156510.1177/0731684417711565 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.019 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0120348510.1007/BF01203485 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-4 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00002-010.1016/S0266-3538(99)00002-0 ↗
57. 10.1177/004051751453475010.1177/0040517514534750 ↗
58. Messiry ME Mohamed A. Analysis of the effect of cyclic loading on cotton-spandex knitted fabric. In: 5th international conference on advances in mechanical aeronautical and production techniques Malaysia 12–13 March 2016.10.15224/978-1-63248-090-3-41 ↗
59. 10.1177/002199831141048410.1177/0021998311410484 ↗
60. 10.1177/004051751038855010.1177/0040517510388550 ↗
61. 10.1108/0955622081086520110.1108/09556220810865201 ↗
62. 10.1177/004051751143500910.1177/0040517511435009 ↗