journal article·2021-04

The influence of textile substrate on the performance of multilayer fabric supercapacitors

S Yong, N Hillier, S Beeby

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 50· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a study investigating the effect of differing textile substrates on the performance of multilayer, aqueous fabric supercapacitors. Three widely available textiles, cotton, polyester-cotton and silk were chosen, and all underwent the same activated carbon deposition process to form electrodes. An automated spray coating was implemented to precisely control the loading of the carbon, and to enable a uniform coating. A vacuum impregnation technique was utilized to increase the wettability of the electrodes and improve the absorption of the aqueous electrolyte. The multilayer supercapacitors showed excellent electrochemical and mechanical stability, with the choice of textile substrate found to have a profound effect on the performance. The silk-based supercapacitor was found to have a gravimetric capacitance of 20.2 F.g −1 (56.6 mF.cm −2 ) at a carbon loading ratio of 15.7 %wt. The polyester-cotton supercapacitor, however, was found to have a superior areal capacitance of 118 mF.cm −2 at a carbon loading ratio of 14.1 %wt. This work will be used to select future substrates and carbon loading levels for real-world e-textiles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Smart Electronic Materials & System Research Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Energy Storage and its Applications Centre of Doctoral Training, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Dias T · 2015
2. 10.1002/smll.20170341810.1002/smll.201703418 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0039110.1021/acs.accounts.8b00391 ↗
4. Conway BE · 2013
5. 10.1093/nsr/nwx00910.1093/nsr/nwx009 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja710617810.1021/ja7106178 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.06710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.067 ↗
8. 10.1002/smtd.20180012410.1002/smtd.201800124 ↗
9. 10.1002/adem.20170086010.1002/adem.201700860 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20140143810.1002/aenm.201401438 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.8b0443810.1021/acsami.8b04438 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0660810.1021/acsnano.6b06608 ↗
13. 10.1002/macp.20180035510.1002/macp.201800355 ↗
14. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa7d7110.1088/2053-1583/aa7d71 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5TA09309K10.1039/C5TA09309K ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20160299410.1002/smll.201602994 ↗
17. 10.1039/C5TA10582J10.1039/C5TA10582J ↗
18. 10.1039/C5MH00108K10.1039/C5MH00108K ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.7b1919510.1021/acsami.7b19195 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.05810.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.058 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.04610.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.046 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.00810.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.008 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10570-018-1786-310.1007/s10570-018-1786-3 ↗