Evaluation and prediction of fused fabric composites properties – A review
Source abstract
Abstract
Garment parts are fused with an interlining for achieving a specific handle, form and fall. Fusing helps in ease of construction of garment parts enabling pucker-free and clean look in finished products. The properties of the fused components are considered essential for enhancing garment aesthetics and functionality. The main objective of this review is to elaborate the factors affecting the properties of fused fabric composites, the methods to evaluate the same and explore the models that aid in better selection of interlinings for a specific hand and functionality. Interlinings are available in a variety of fibre content, base fabric structure, weight, finish, resin type and resin content. These attributes influence the characteristics of fused fabric composites. They are essential criteria in interlining selection for a given application. Mechanical properties used to evaluate and predict the fused fabric behaviour objectively are discussed. The most important mechanical properties that describe the characteristics of fused fabric composites are bending rigidity, shear rigidity, tensile properties, drape and dimensional stability of the component fabrics. Objective and subjective methods used to evaluate these properties are elaborated. The methods employed in determining the optimum fusing conditions and fused composite quality include theoretical, statistical, numerical, and computational modelling. A better understanding of the properties of fused fabric composites leads to optimisation in the interlining selection and fusing process for a given hand feel and application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Apparel Technology and Management, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/01207710.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012077 ↗
2. 10.1108/eb00295010.1108/eb002950 ↗
3. Dehghani N, Valipouri A, Minapoor S. Investigating the effect of underlying fabric on the bagging behaviour of denim fabrics (RESEARCH NOTE). Int J Eng 2019; 32: 1231–1237.
4. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101211-6.00006-910.1016/B978-0-08-101211-6.00006-9 ↗
5. Zhang Q. Potential of printable interlining in place of fusible interlining in garment manufacture. PhD Thesis Institute of Textiles and Clothing: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong 2018.
6. 10.1177/00405175710410080710.1177/004051757104100807 ↗
7. 10.5772/6430910.5772/64309 ↗
8. 10.1108/0955622981069364510.1108/09556229810693645 ↗
9. Yildiz EZ, Ozdil N. Subjective and objective evaluation of the handle properties of the shirt fabric fused with different woven interlining. J Text Apparel 2014; 24: 47–55.
10. Horrocks AR, Anand SC (eds). Handbook of technical textiles. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000.
11. 10.1007/978-1-84882-608-310.1007/978-1-84882-608-3 ↗
12. 10.1080/15440478.2014.88010210.1080/15440478.2014.880102 ↗
13. 10.1533/9781845695231.11610.1533/9781845695231.116 ↗
14. 10.9790/019X-012313310.9790/019X-0123133 ↗
15. Singha K. A review on coating & lamination in textiles: processes and applications. Asian J Pharm Sci 2012; 2: 39–49.
16. Cooklin G. Fusing technology. New York City: Hyperion Books, 1990.
17. 10.1177/15280830303858710.1177/152808303038587 ↗
18. 10.1533/9780857093967.3.35510.1533/9780857093967.3.355 ↗
19. 10.1177/15280837970260030510.1177/152808379702600305 ↗
20. Ebnesajjad S. Handbook of adhesives and surface preparation: technology, applications and manufacturing. Norwich, NY: William Andrew, 2010.
21. 10.1201/b1787310.1201/b17873 ↗
22. Cawood MP. Textiles: some technical information and data VI: fusing. New Delhi: CSIR, 1980.
23. 10.1201/b1919010.1201/b19190 ↗
24. Ghosh P. Adhesive and coating technology. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2008, pp. 53–54.
25. Brydson JA. 11-aliphatic polyolefins other than polyethylene and diene rubbers. Plastics materials. 7th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford UK; Elsevier: Armstrong The Netherlands 1999 Chapter 11 pp. 247–310.10.1016/B978-075064132-6/50052-8 ↗
26. 10.1177/15280837980270030310.1177/152808379802700303 ↗
27. 10.1177/15280837930220030410.1177/152808379302200304 ↗
28. 10.1177/15280837870160030610.1177/152808378701600306 ↗
29. Mortazavi SM, Esmailzadeh BP. Application of mixtures of resin finishing to achieve some physical properties on interlining cotton fabrics: I-effect of stiffening and cross-linking agents. Iran Polym J 2004; 1: 213–218.
30. Ebnesajjad S, Landrock AH. Adhesives technology handbook. Norwich, NY: William Andrew, 2014, p.119.
31. Mitsubishi Engineering-Plastics Corporation Tokyo www.m-ep.co.jp/en/product/brand/reny/index.html (accessed 4 January 2019).
32. Petrie EM. Alternative fabric-joining technologies. In: Nayak R Radhye R (eds) Garment Manufacturing Technology. Swaston UK: Woodhead Publishing 2015 pp. 337–371.10.1016/B978-1-78242-232-7.00013-8 ↗
33. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102428-7.00002-X10.1016/B978-0-08-102428-7.00002-X ↗
34. Marler VM. Nonwoven interfacing: a comparison of fusible and non fusible interfacing fabrics after laundering. Master’s Thesis Kansas State University Manhattan USA 1971.
35. 10.1177/15280837780080020210.1177/152808377800800202 ↗
36. 10.1177/15280837930230020110.1177/152808379302300201 ↗
37. Schwartz P (ed). Structure and mechanics of textile fibre assemblies. Swaston, UK: Woodhead publishing, 2019.
38. Freudenberg Performance Materials. Global interlining solutions www.freudenberg-pm.com//media/Files/Global%20files%20for%20all%20sites/Brochures/FPM_Bro_Apparel_Download.pdf (accessed 21 August 2019).
39. Kamat DV. Fusible interlining of improved bond strength and dry cleaning resistance. U.S. Patent 4 415 622 1983.
40. Kornilova N, Koksharov S, Arbuzova A, et al. Development of reinforced interlining materials to regulate elastic properties. Ind J Fibre Text Res 2017; 42: 150–159.
41. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.816.21910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.816.219 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10853-019-04203-210.1007/s10853-019-04203-2 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20180026910.1002/adfm.201800269 ↗
44. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1117.23510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1117.235 ↗
45. Šaravanja B Pušić T Malarić K. Impact of wet treatments on the shield effect of functional interlining fabrics. In: AUTEX 19th world textile conference on textiles at the crossroads Ghent Belgium 1 January 2019.10.21825/autex.63654 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.02110.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.021 ↗
47. 10.1177/00405175610310071210.1177/004051756103100712 ↗
48. 10.1177/00405175970670021010.1177/004051759706700210 ↗
49. Amar Z, Al-Gamal G. Effect of different types and orientations of fusible interlinings on men striped shirt cuffs. J Am Sci 2015; 11: 66–72.
50. 10.1108/0955622091099573810.1108/09556220910995738 ↗
51. 10.1080/1944702600866257810.1080/19447026008662578 ↗
52. 10.1108/0955622951008721810.1108/09556229510087218 ↗
53. 10.1108/0955622001031382310.1108/09556220010313823 ↗
54. 10.1177/004051750934978410.1177/0040517509349784 ↗
55. Golomeova S, Demboski G, Jordevaet al. Selection of a supplier of thermoplastic interlining by numerical evaluation matrix. Mech Eng 2018; 36: 63–71.
56. 10.1108/0955622971016836010.1108/09556229710168360 ↗
57. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2014-014110.1108/IJCST-12-2014-0141 ↗
58. ASTM D2724 − 07 (Reapproved 2011); Standard test methods for bonded fused and laminated apparel fabrics.
59. 10.1007/s12221-018-7464-510.1007/s12221-018-7464-5 ↗
60. 10.3390/polym1011123010.3390/polym10111230 ↗
61. 10.1007/BF0287727810.1007/BF02877278 ↗
62. 10.14502/Tekstilec2018.61.224-23410.14502/Tekstilec2018.61.224-234 ↗
63. 10.7741/rjcc.2017.25.4.44810.7741/rjcc.2017.25.4.448 ↗
64. 10.1108/eb00296210.1108/eb002962 ↗
65. 10.1177/004051750505763710.1177/0040517505057637 ↗
66. 10.1177/00405175870570060710.1177/004051758705700607 ↗
67. 10.1177/00405175890590080310.1177/004051758905900803 ↗
68. 10.1177/00405175890590120310.1177/004051758905901203 ↗
69. 10.1177/00405175900600010210.1177/004051759006000102 ↗
70. 10.1080/0040500890865918410.1080/00405008908659184 ↗
71. 10.1080/1944702300866152910.1080/19447023008661529 ↗
72. 10.1080/0040500930863126110.1080/00405009308631261 ↗
73. Behery HM. Effects of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2005.
74. Kawabata S. The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation. 2nd ed. Japan: Textile Machinery Society, 1980.
75. 10.1080/0040500730863041610.1080/00405007308630416 ↗
76. 10.1080/0040500730863041710.1080/00405007308630417 ↗
77. 10.1080/0040500730863041810.1080/00405007308630418 ↗
78. Kawabata S, Niwa M. Objective measurement of fabric hand. In: Raheel M (eds) Modern textile characterization methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996, pp.329–354.
79. D Boos A Tester D. FAST. Report no WT92.02 CSIRO 1994.
80. 10.1108/ijcst.2000.05812aaa.00110.1108/ijcst.2000.05812aaa.001 ↗
81. 10.1108/0955622051059083010.1108/09556220510590830 ↗
82. 10.1177/00405175930630010410.1177/004051759306300104 ↗
83. 10.1533/9781845690984.2.23910.1533/9781845690984.2.239 ↗
84. Frydrych L, Cieslinska A, Krucinska L. An attempt to objectivize the assessment of fabric handle on the instron tensile tester. Przeglad Wlokienniczy 1999; 1: 8–11.
85. 10.1177/00405175500200080210.1177/004051755002000802 ↗
86. Dent RW. An analysis of fabric ‘hand’ and ‘feel’. Int Nonwovens J 2000; 9: 11--17.
87. 10.1080/0040500930865898010.1080/00405009308658980 ↗
88. 10.1115/1.318382410.1115/1.3183824 ↗
89. INDA Test Methods SubINDA Softness-Hand Research Study Committee Report 1974.
90. 10.1108/0955622001037785010.1108/09556220010377850 ↗
91. 10.4188/jte.52.110.4188/jte.52.1 ↗
92. 10.1177/004051751243812610.1177/0040517512438126 ↗
93. 10.1080/1944702580866246310.1080/19447025808662463 ↗
94. 10.1177/004051751243812110.1177/0040517512438121 ↗
95. 10.1177/004051750809078510.1177/0040517508090785 ↗
96. 10.1177/004051751665234610.1177/0040517516652346 ↗
97. 10.1177/00405175990690011010.1177/004051759906900110 ↗
98. 10.1177/00405175880580080210.1177/004051758805800802 ↗
99. 10.1177/00405175010710080210.1177/004051750107100802 ↗
100. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.432010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.4320 ↗