Evaluating the antibacterial properties of chitosan fibres embedded with copper ions for wound dressing applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Chitosan is a natural polymer that is well known for its inherent antimicrobial ability and natural healing properties and hence it has been developed into fibres that are used for wound dressing applications. To increase its antimicrobial potency, these fibres are treated with copper sulphate. In a wound environment, copper ions have potent antimicrobial abilities due to their propensity to bind with proteins and ability to produce hydrogen peroxides. In this article, copper-treated chitosan fibres of different concentrations have been tested and analysed to determine the most effective antimicrobial dose for potential wound care dressings. Selected common skin microflora, i.e. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus luteus, have been used to test the chitosan–copper combinations. The analysis, based on the test methods of zone of inhibition, spectrophotometry and plating technique, has shown that copper concentration of 0.3 gm/ml was highly effective against the three bacteria and could potentially be most suitable formulation for wound dressing applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for R&D in Life Sciences, Dayananda Sagar Institutions and Microbiology Research Laboratory, Post Graduate Department of Microbiology, Dr CD Sagar Centre for Life Sciences, Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumarswamy Layout, Bangalore, India
Centre for Materials Research and Innovation, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK
The Biochemical Materials Research and Development Centre, Jiaxing College, South Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0147-5975(79)80054-710.1016/S0147-5975(79)80054-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.01210.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012 ↗
3. 10.1021/bm034130m10.1021/bm034130m ↗
4. 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90035-910.1016/0142-9612(91)90035-9 ↗
5. Paul W · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2004 · 18 · 18
6. Khor E · 2001
7. 10.1016/j.burns.2005.10.01510.1016/j.burns.2005.10.015 ↗
8. Jayakumar R · Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications · 2011 · 29 · 322
9. Balassa LL · 1984 · 296
10. 10.1016/0166-3542(82)90052-310.1016/0166-3542(82)90052-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/0048-9697(80)90122-910.1016/0048-9697(80)90122-9 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07804.x10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07804.x ↗
13. 10.2307/357633010.2307/3576330 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tox.2003.11.00110.1016/j.tox.2003.11.001 ↗
15. Domek MJ, Lechevallier MW, Cameron SC, et al. Evidence for the role of copper in the injury process of coliform bacteria in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984; 48(2): 289–293. Available at: N:\fd\sage\Feedbacks\01-04-13\Final-xml.10.1128/aem.48.2.289-293.1984 ↗
16. 10.1139/m87-01010.1139/m87-010 ↗
17. 10.1021/bi00354a00410.1021/bi00354a004 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00328-810.1016/S0142-9612(00)00328-8 ↗
19. Eldin MSM · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2008 · 22 · 154
20. 10.1002/jbm.126010.1002/jbm.1260 ↗
21. Muzzarelli RAA · 1989 · 87
22. 10.1177/152808371037698510.1177/1528083710376985 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-94-011-5942-5_910.1007/978-94-011-5942-5_9 ↗
24. Minami S · 1992
25. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1996.40109.x10.1046/j.1524-475X.1996.40109.x ↗
26. Sathirakul K · Adv Chitin Sci · 1996 · 1 · 490
27. Yi Min Qin · Adv Mater Res · 2011 · 465 · 308
28. Khan TA · J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci · 2000 · 3 · 303
29. 10.1021/cr030441b10.1021/cr030441b ↗
30. 10.1097/00005373-200301000-0002310.1097/00005373-200301000-00023 ↗
31. Azad AK · J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater · 69 · 216
32. 10.7205/MILMED.169.9.71610.7205/MILMED.169.9.716 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.05.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2004.05.002 ↗
34. Changjun YQ · Chem Fibres Int · 2009 · 3 · 154