Tensile strength of notched carbon/glass/epoxy hybrid composite laminates before and after fatigue loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid laminates consisting of C-glass woven fabric/epoxy composite plies and 3k-carbon woven fabric/epoxy composite plies are studied for fatigue damage and residual strength. Tension–tension fatigue tests were conducted on notched composite laminates at two load ratios of 0.1 and 0.25. The laminates were fabricated with the hand lay-up process for a symmetrical stacking sequence [0/90] 3s made of three 3k-carbon/epoxy composite plies at both top and bottom sections and six C-glass/epoxy composite plies in the middle. Fatigue damage was generated on notched specimens with 4 × 10 4 load cycles to damage for residual strength tests. The hybridization was found to be beneficial for relative damage sensitivity under one of four different fatigue conditions although its effect was marginal while three other conditions were not in favor. A relative damage sensitivity factor expression (or a criterion) was developed for quantitative comparisons between non-hybrid and hybrid composites and was theoretically demonstrated to be valid for any possible cases where various combinations are possible due to differences in strength reduction rate between two different composite systems. A theoretical framework with the relative damage sensitivity factor is proposed as a guide to deal with the complexity involving uncertainties and a large number of variables in the hybrid composite system. New damage mechanisms of the hybrid system due to dissimilarity between two sub-composite systems (i.e. glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy) were hypothesized and tested to be valid with evidence based on microscopic and macroscopic examinations. The difference between static and fatigue damage is discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Department of Aerospace, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.00310.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.003 ↗
2. Daniel IM · 1994
3. Gururaja MN · Int J Soft Comput Eng · 2012 · 1 · 352
4. 10.1016/0142-1123(88)90018-710.1016/0142-1123(88)90018-7 ↗
5. 10.1177/073168440935828210.1177/0731684409358282 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.006 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12541-011-0108-610.1007/s12541-011-0108-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-510.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 ↗
9. Das S. The cost of automotive polymer composites: a review and assessment of DOE's lightweight materials composites research. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2001.10.2172/777656 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219983750090040710.1177/002199837500900407 ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90063-M10.1016/0266-3538(93)90063-M ↗
12. 10.1016/S0011-2275(00)00019-910.1016/S0011-2275(00)00019-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00012-910.1016/S1359-8368(01)00012-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00201-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00201-9 ↗
15. 10.1299/kikaia.68.105410.1299/kikaia.68.1054 ↗
16. Philippidis TP and Passipoularidis V. Residual static strength of fibrous composites after fatigue: a literature survey. Optimat Blades_TG5-R001_UP rev 000, 2002.
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.031 ↗
18. 10.1243/030932404189651510.1243/0309324041896515 ↗
19. 10.1243/030932405X1610610.1243/030932405X16106 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.06.00610.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.06.006 ↗
22. Jang SS · Korean Soc Ind Appl · 2007 · 10 · 143
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.05.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.05.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/0010-4361(92)90284-210.1016/0010-4361(92)90284-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00053-710.1016/S1359-835X(01)00053-7 ↗
30. Yoshioka K and Seferis JC. Tension–tension fatigue of resin transfer molding composites. In: Proceedings of the 46th international SAMPE symposium and exhibition , Long Beach, USA, May 2001.
31. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00109-410.1016/S1359-835X(02)00109-4 ↗
32. Allameh Haery H, Zahari R, Kuntjoro W, et al. Tensile strength of notched woven fabric hybrid glass, carbon/epoxy composite laminates. J Ind Text 2012; August 5: 1–13.10.1177/1528083712456055 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07772.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07772.x ↗
34. 10.1177/00219983750090020610.1177/002199837500900206 ↗
35. 10.1177/07316844850040010210.1177/073168448500400102 ↗
36. Bertalanffy LV · 1968
37. 10.1177/07316840177267895910.1177/073168401772678959 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00231-510.1016/S0266-3538(97)00231-5 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.031 ↗
40. Zahari R · Jurnal Mekanikal · 2008 · 25 · 80
41. Desai MB and McGarry FJ. Failure mechanisms in glass fibre reinforced plastics. ASTM Bulletin 1659.
42. 10.3139/9781569905258.00310.3139/9781569905258.003 ↗
43. 10.1002/app.2659610.1002/app.26596 ↗