journal article·2020-02

Response surface methodology optimization of electrospinning process parameters to fabricate aligned polyvinyl butyral nanofibers for interlaminar toughening of phenolic-based composite laminates

Parvaneh Kheirkhah Barzoki, Masoud Latifi, Amir Masoud Rezadoust

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 49· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study and for the first time, aligned nanofibers were produced from low molecular weight polyvinyl butyral. Using response surface methodology, the preparation condition of aligned nanofiber was optimized in terms of nanofiber diameter and its structural stability. Central composite design as a response surface methodology was employed and the effects of process variables and their influence on nanofiber diameter were investigated. Based on a statistical analysis, the use of a model, which was used to determine the nanofiber diameter, proved to be successful because of its low probability value (0.0073) and high correlation coefficient (0.9619). A high-speed cylinder collector was used to fabricate aligned polyvinyl butyral nanofibers. The optimum conditions of 17.5 kV voltage, 10 cm collector distance, 13% solution concentration, and 2100 r/min rotational speed were obtained from experiments. The least diameter of 158.6 nm along with a stable structure was determined for polyvinyl butyral nanofiber prepared under the optimum conditions. An aligned polyvinyl butyral nanoweb was applied on the mid-layer of glass-phenolic laminated composites as an interlaminar reinforcement. The fracture behavior of the laminates was determined by end-notched flexure tests. Excellent toughening property which was observed for the aligned polyvinyl butyral nanofibers caused the mode-II fracture toughness and its maximum force to increase by 25.2 and 40.8%, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Textile Engineering Department, Textile Excellence & Research Centers, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Composite Group, Tehran, Iran

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Brown P and Stevens K. Nanofibers and nanotechnology in textiles . Cambridge and London: Elsevier, 2007.10.1201/9781439823965 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X ↗
3. Lubasova D and Martinova L. Controlled morphology of porous polyvinyl butyral nanofibers. J Nanomater 2011. DOI:10.1155/2011/292516.10.1155/2011/292516 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10529-018-2522-710.1007/s10529-018-2522-7 ↗
5. Yener F and Jirsak O. Comparison between the needle and roller electrospinning of polyvinylbutyral. J Nanomater 2012. DOI:10.1155/2012/839317.10.1155/2012/839317 ↗
6. 10.1515/epoly-2013-012110.1515/epoly-2013-0121 ↗
7. Yener F · Iran J Chem Chem Eng English Ed · 2012 · 31 · 49
8. 10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20040071910.1002/adma.200400719 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.01210.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.012 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl048615810.1021/nl0486158 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/12/3/32910.1088/0957-4484/12/3/329 ↗
14. 10.1021/ma800014310.1021/ma8000143 ↗
15. Andrady AL. Science and technology of polymer nanofibers . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.10.1002/9780470229842 ↗
16. Qin Q and Ye J. Toughening mechanisms in composite materials . Cambridge and London: Elsevier; 2015.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10853-016-9754-510.1007/s10853-016-9754-5 ↗
19. Dzenis YA and Reneker DH. Delamination resistant composites prepared by small diameter fiber reinforcement at ply interfaces. Patent US0920193, USA, 2001.
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.021 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2264310.1002/pc.22643 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.039 ↗
23. Barzoki PK, Rezadoust AM, Latifi M, et al. The experimental and numerical study on the effect of PVB nanofiber mat thickness on interlaminar fracture toughness of glass/phenolic composites. Eng Fract Mech 2018; 194: 145–153.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.027 ↗
24. Knop A and Pilato LA. Phenolic resins: Chemistry, applications and performance . Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 1985.10.1007/978-3-662-02429-4 ↗
25. Pilato L. Phenolic resins: A century of progress . Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-04714-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.11.01910.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.11.019 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.02410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.01710.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.017 ↗
29. 10.1177/152808371561363110.1177/1528083715613631 ↗
30. Rahimi Tanha N and Nouri M. An experimental study on the coaxial electrospinning of silk fibroin/poly(vinyl alcohol)–salicylic acid core–shell nanofibers and process optimization using response surface methodology. J Ind Text . 2018; 48: 884–903.10.1177/1528083717747334 ↗
31. 10.1007/s13726-016-0444-610.1007/s13726-016-0444-6 ↗
32. European Structural Integrity Society. Protocol no. 2 for interlaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: Mode II. Bordeaux, France: European Structural Integrity Society, 1993.