journal article·2018-01

Quasi-static indentation response of aramid fiber/epoxy composites containing nylon 66 electrospun nano-interlayers

Mostafa Goodarz, Hajir Bahrami, Mojtaba Sadighi, Saeed Saber-Samandari

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 47· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In the last decade, polymer nanofibers have found promising application for improving through-thickness properties of structural composite laminates through interleaving. The main advantage of inserting nanofibers in conventional composites is making the matrix between the layers tougher. In this article, the benefits of using electrospun fibrous nano-interleaves in enhancing the quasi-static indentation response of aramid/epoxy laminated composites was investigated and the effect of variables of produced nano-interleaves including interleaf thickness (17.5, 35, and 70 µm) and stacking configuration (one-side, central, and two-side interleaving) on behavior of the nano-modified composites was investigated. The results indicate that force, displacement, absorbed energy, and stiffness of these composites are significantly affected by the presence of nano-interleaves. The optimum values were observed in the composites with 35 µm thickness of nano-interleave where three first parameters were higher than their reference values, but the stiffness value had opposite trend of other parameters. On the other hand, it can be seen that only asymmetrical (back-side indentation) stacking configuration lead to improving the composite properties. The visual inspection of the indentation damaged specimens reveals that thickness and stacking configuration of interleaves controls the size of damage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. AL-Oqla FM, Alothman OY, Jawaid M, et al. Processing and properties of date palm fibers and its composites. In: Hakeem KR, Jawaid M and Rashid U (eds) Biomass and bioenergy . New Delhi, India 2014: pp.1–25.10.1007/978-3-319-07641-6_1 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12221-015-0153-310.1007/s12221-015-0153-3 ↗
3. 10.15376/biores.10.1.299-31210.15376/biores.10.1.299-312 ↗
4. 10.1201/978142000598110.1201/9781420005981 ↗
5. 10.1016/0013-7944(88)90181-610.1016/0013-7944(88)90181-6 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2053510.1002/pc.20535 ↗
7. 10.1002/pat.183710.1002/pat.1837 ↗
8. Kanani AG · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2010 · 24 · 93
9. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.810.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.09.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2014.09.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20040071910.1002/adma.200400719 ↗
13. Dzenis YA and Reneker DH. Delamination resistant composites prepared by small diameter fiber reinforcement at ply interfaces. Google Patents , 2001.
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.01510.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.015 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168440708650410.1177/0731684407086504 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.039 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.08010.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.080 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.02110.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.021 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2121010.1002/pc.21210 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.021 ↗
25. Jassal M · Indian J Fibre Textile Res · 2002 · 27 · 290
26. Wardle M · J Ind Textile · 1978 · 7 · 334
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.028 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90127-310.1016/0266-3538(93)90127-3 ↗
32. 10.1177/073168441558463510.1177/0731684415584635 ↗
33. 10.1177/00219983910250020510.1177/002199839102500205 ↗
34. Nettles AT and Douglas MJ. A comparison of quasi-static indentation testing to low velocity impact testing. In: Zureick A and Nettles AT (eds) Composite materials: testing, design, and acceptance criteria . Pensylvania: ASTM International, 2002, pp.116–130.10.1520/STP10634S ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.3687110.1002/app.36871 ↗
37. Abrate S · 2005
38. Sridharan S · 2008
39. ASTM D6264. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fibrereinforced polymer–matrix composite to a concentrated quasi-static indentation force . Pennsylvania: ASTM International, 2012.
40. 10.1177/00219983930270050110.1177/002199839302700501 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.021 ↗