Design of dry electrodes and impedance variations across different electrostimulation modalities
Source abstract
Abstract
In electrostimulation applications, the role of dry-textile electrode is significant as compared to customary electrodes. It has vast demand due to their flexibility, breathability and its coherent integration to wearable medical devices. The use of electrostimulation to enhance the muscular structure and function is not a new idea; however, the introduction of dry textile electrodes can enhance the efficiency of the process. The review explores the different types of electrodes, mainly dry textile electrodes, its fabrication and performance across different modalities. The main focus includes the role of impedance across different electrode characterization, parameters of skin-electrodes contact point impedance and the operating devices with their operating system. A comprehensive review has been compiled to analyze various types of textile electrodes to determine their efficacy in different therapeutic modalities. The results suggest that different types of electrodes work different in various kind of modalities. It also concludes that sustainable conductive textile electrodes are considered a novel approach that can replace traditional metal or graphite electrodes. Moreover, it also suggests that the three-lead method provide the best way to evaluate the impedance across the electrode, excluding all remaining symmetric impedance of body. This review also highlights the sustainability and biocompatibility of dry textile electrodes and their potential to improve the patient’s comfort in electrostimulation therapies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ENSAIT, GEMTEX–Laboratoire de Génie et Matériaux Textiles, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Qassim University
Funding
ENSAIT, GEMTEX–Laboratoire de Génie et Matériaux Textiles, University of Lille
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.10016710.1016/j.arrct.2021.100167 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40122-023-00554-610.1007/s40122-023-00554-6 ↗
3. 10.1186/s10195-021-00623-610.1186/s10195-021-00623-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.wees.2024.10.00410.1016/j.wees.2024.10.004 ↗
5. Shaner SW, Islam M, Kristoffersen MB, et al. Skin stimulation and recording: moving towards metal-free electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron X 2022; 11: 100143.
6. 10.1038/s41598-025-91452-810.1038/s41598-025-91452-8 ↗
7. 10.1080/0040500090344208610.1080/00405000903442086 ↗
8. 10.3390/s2023691010.3390/s20236910 ↗
9. 10.1186/s12938-021-00905-410.1186/s12938-021-00905-4 ↗
10. 10.3390/nano1108215210.3390/nano11082152 ↗
11. 10.1533/9781845690441.22310.1533/9781845690441.223 ↗
12. 10.1186/s12938-020-00772-510.1186/s12938-020-00772-5 ↗
13. 10.3390/s15071724110.3390/s150717241 ↗
14. 10.1109/TIM.2013.228907210.1109/TIM.2013.2289072 ↗
15. 10.1109/BioCAS.2012.641851110.1109/BioCAS.2012.6418511 ↗
16. Lanatà A, Valenza G, Scilingo EP. A novel EDA glove based on textile-integrated electrodes for affective computing. Med Biol Eng Comput 2012: 50–1172.
17. 10.1109/JSEN.2012.222116310.1109/JSEN.2012.2221163 ↗
18. 10.3390/bios1307067910.3390/bios13070679 ↗
19. 10.3390/s2105157810.3390/s21051578 ↗
20. 10.1152/physrev.00017.202310.1152/physrev.00017.2023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.01110.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.011 ↗
22. 10.3138/ptc.2015-8810.3138/ptc.2015-88 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.09.00810.1016/j.jelekin.2014.09.008 ↗
24. 10.1080/10400435.1992.1013218910.1080/10400435.1992.10132189 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.15510.1016/j.snb.2018.08.155 ↗
26. 10.1109/RBME.2010.208407810.1109/RBME.2010.2084078 ↗
27. Golparvar AJ, Kaya YM. Wearable graphene textile-enabled EOG sensing. Proceedings of IEEE Sensors 2017: 1–13.
28. 10.1088/1741-2552/abbd5010.1088/1741-2552/abbd50 ↗
29. 10.1111/psyp.1253610.1111/psyp.12536 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0028210.1021/acsomega.2c00282 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0017110.1021/acsaelm.0c00171 ↗
32. 10.1186/s12938-018-0469-510.1186/s12938-018-0469-5 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.7b0995410.1021/acsami.7b09954 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.03.02510.1016/j.sna.2014.03.025 ↗
35. Zhang H, Li W, Tao X, et al. Textile-structured human body surface biopotential signal acquisition electrode. Proceedings - 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing 2011; 5: 2797.
36. 10.3390/electronics805047910.3390/electronics8050479 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.00910.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.009 ↗
38. 10.1186/s12938-024-01246-810.1186/s12938-024-01246-8 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12221-018-7917-510.1007/s12221-018-7917-5 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10918110.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109181 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00339-018-2071-x10.1007/s00339-018-2071-x ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20030495510.1002/adma.200304955 ↗
43. 10.1021/am900744n10.1021/am900744n ↗
44. 10.1021/la802182y10.1021/la802182y ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20130118410.1002/adma.201301184 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0165-0270(96)00111-210.1016/S0165-0270(96)00111-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00332-010.1016/S0379-6779(01)00332-0 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.00610.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.006 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00003-X10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00003-X ↗
50. 10.1177/152808371773207610.1177/1528083717732076 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10918110.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109181 ↗
52. 10.3390/s2023691010.3390/s20236910 ↗
53. Čuden AP. Recent developments in knitting technology. Advanced Knitting Technology. 1st ed.Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing 2022; 13–66.10.1016/B978-0-323-85534-1.00020-9 ↗
54. 10.1177/1528083724125361410.1177/15280837241253614 ↗
55. 10.1177/152808371769936810.1177/1528083717699368 ↗
56. 10.1186/s40691-023-00351-x10.1186/s40691-023-00351-x ↗
57. 10.1201/b1031810.1201/b10318 ↗
58. Gruyaert E, Van Tittelboom K, Backer PD, et al. Electro-conductive yarns: their development, characterization and applications. ICSHM 2013; 28: 196–200.
59. Bashir T. Conjugated polymer-based conductive fibers for smart textile applications. Sensors 2007; 7: 473.
60. 10.3390/s704047310.3390/s7040473 ↗
61. 10.1002/app.2210510.1002/app.22105 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.7b0672610.1021/acsami.7b06726 ↗
63. Ujiie H. Digital printing of textiles. Digital printing of textiles, 2006.
64. Ragab MM, Othman HA, Hassabo AG. An overview of printing textile techniques. Egypt J Chem 2022; 65: 761.
65. Kašiković N. Textile printing - past present future. Gazette of Chemists Technologists & Environmentalists 2016.
66. 10.1002/advs.20230414010.1002/advs.202304140 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsami.1c0182710.1021/acsami.1c01827 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsami.9b0643210.1021/acsami.9b06432 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsami.8b1823110.1021/acsami.8b18231 ↗
70. Kishore N. Different textile printing techniques - hand block printing, screen printing, and digital printing. EBSCOhost 2025.
71. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13006410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130064 ↗
72. 10.1186/s40691-020-00240-710.1186/s40691-020-00240-7 ↗
73. El-Sayed E, Othman H, Hassabo AG, et al. A short observation on the printing cotton fabric using some technique. Journal of Textiles, Coloration and Polymer Science 2022; 19: 17–24.
74. 10.3390/s2007188110.3390/s20071881 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.04.02110.1016/j.carbon.2022.04.021 ↗
76. 10.1109/10.459910.1109/10.4599 ↗
77. 10.2478/aut-2022-002710.2478/aut-2022-0027 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.sna.2003.10.07110.1016/j.sna.2003.10.071 ↗
79. 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.26015510.1109/IEMBS.2006.260155 ↗
80. 10.3390/s15071724110.3390/s150717241 ↗
81. 10.1088/2058-8585/acc54010.1088/2058-8585/acc540 ↗
82. 10.36922/ijb.172510.36922/ijb.1725 ↗
83. 10.1002/pssb.20077618610.1002/pssb.200776186 ↗
84. 10.1002/app.4635710.1002/app.46357 ↗
85. Sci-hub | electrode materials for chronic electrical microstimulation. Adv Healthcare Mater 10(12) 2100119 | 10.1002/adhm.202100119.10.1002/adhm.202100119 ↗
86. Electrode impedance: what it is, and how it affect the quality of electrophysiological signals and electrical stimulation - an explanation for non-engineers. Plexon. Accessed: Mar. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available:https://plexon.com/blog-post/electrode-impedance/
87. Electrical stimulation and electrode properties. Part 2: pure metal electrodes. PubMed. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21313789/
88. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/03602910.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036029 ↗
89. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac5ad510.1149/1945-7111/ac5ad5 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.00510.1016/j.snb.2016.10.005 ↗
91. 10.1109/10.459910.1109/10.4599 ↗
92. 10.3390/nano1108215210.3390/nano11082152 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.12.00210.1016/j.addr.2012.12.002 ↗
94. 10.1109/TBME.2015.246231210.1109/TBME.2015.2462312 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.01510.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.015 ↗
96. 10.3390/bioengineering303002010.3390/bioengineering3030020 ↗
97. Dry physiological recording electrode ” 2001.
98. 10.3390/mi1008051810.3390/mi10080518 ↗
99. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1968.tb11978.x10.1111/j.1365-2133.1968.tb11978.x ↗
100. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.09.01110.1016/j.tiv.2011.09.011 ↗