journal article·2022-06Open access

Experimental study and simulation of non-crimp 3D orthogonal composite shafts during torsional load

Raouf Moaveni, Saeed Ajeli, Shohreh Minapoor

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 3_suppl

Abstract

Non-crimp 3D orthogonal fabrics are high-tech textiles with three sets of orthogonal yarns. 3D composites reinforced by this fabric have a high performance and wide usages due to their structure. This study attempted to investigate the torsional behavior of Glass/epoxy composite rods reinforced by 3D fabrics experimentally and numerically. Accordingly, three different 3D weaves, including low-density and high-density non-crimp 3D orthogonal, and braid-pultruded fabrics were tested by a torsion tester machine. The results showed that non-crimp 3D orthogonal composites, especially those with a higher density, had better torsional properties than the others, due to the square cross-section and perpendicular fiber involvement in all directions. Optimal torsional properties were obtained for the high-density non-crimp 3D orthogonal composite with the lower void content. Also, a python code was developed to simulate the torsional behavior of the rod composite in macro-scale based on the geometry of the unit cell and the mechanical constants obtained from the meso-scale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Textile Engineering, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
2. Fukuta K · 1995
3. Kaldenhoff R · 1997
4. Tong L · 2002
5. Lomov SV · ICCM · 2011 · 18 · 1
6. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00070-610.1016/S1359-835X(99)00070-6 ↗
7. Khokar N. Making the uniaxial noobing process industrially relevant. In: 5th World Conference on 3D Fabrics and Their Applications, 16 December 2013, 2013.
8. 10.1080/0040500990869062410.1080/00405009908690624 ↗
9. Stig F · 2012
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.012 ↗
12. Siva W · J Manuf Eng · 2013 · 8 · 60
13. Minapoor S · Int J Civil Environ Eng · 2016 · 10 · 1109
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00071-810.1016/S1359-835X(99)00071-8 ↗
15. 10.2514/6.1991-95610.2514/6.1991-956 ↗
16. 10.1016/0961-9526(93)90053-M10.1016/0961-9526(93)90053-M ↗
17. 10.1016/0961-9526(93)90033-G10.1016/0961-9526(93)90033-G ↗
18. 10.1177/002199830203601048610.1177/0021998302036010486 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.046 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.14510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.145 ↗
22. 10.1177/004051751983283710.1177/0040517519832837 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.01610.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.016 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00214-910.1016/S0263-8223(03)00214-9 ↗
25. 10.12989/sem.2017.62.1.03310.12989/sem.2017.62.1.033 ↗
26. Minapoor S · Int J Aerospace Mech Eng · 2015 · 9 · 982
27. 10.1080/00405000.2012.67568210.1080/00405000.2012.675682 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.04810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.048 ↗
29. Lomov SV, Ivanov DS, Verpoest I. Finite element modelling of progressive damage in non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave and plain weave E-glass composites. In: 2nd World conference on 3D fabrics, Greenville, SC, 6–7 April 2009; 2009.
30. Standard A · 2005
31. Standard A · Annu Book ASTM Stand · 2007 · 3 · 1297
32. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.01410.1016/j.dental.2011.04.014 ↗
33. 10.1201/978142005829110.1201/9781420058291 ↗
34. Suh NP · 2005
35. 10.1177/152808371877598010.1177/1528083718775980 ↗
36. 10.1201/b1629510.1201/b16295 ↗