Development of environment friendly biodegradable biopolymer-based hydrogel composites incorporated with waste cotton for wound dressings
Source abstract
Abstract
In modern healthcare, environmental issues, including the extensive use of non-biodegradable materials and rising medical waste, are critical concerns. Addressing these challenges, this study developed environmentally friendly alginate/chitosan hydrogel composites reinforced with nonwoven textiles from industrial cotton waste and enhanced with the natural antibacterial agents neem and turmeric. The composites were prepared with varying concentrations of alginate/chitosan hydrogels (0.75%, 1.25%, 1.75%) and different nonwoven fabric densities (50, 100, 150 GSM). Key findings reveal that neem-treated samples exhibited the highest wound exudate absorption (420%) at 150 GSM and 0.75% hydrogel concentration, whereas turmeric-treated samples provided optimal moisture management, with an overall moisture management capacity (OMMC) of 0.45 at 150 GSM and 1.75% hydrogel concentration. Additionally, turmeric-treated samples achieved higher air permeability (108 mm/sec) compared to neem-treated samples (62 mm/sec) at 1.75% hydrogel and 150 GSM. In terms of mechanical properties, neem treatment resulted in superior tensile strength (32.05 N), while turmeric treatment improved flexibility, with an elongation of 13.98%. These results indicated the composite’s potential for wound dressing applications, with neem treatment suitable for high absorbency and tensile strength, and turmeric treatment ideal for moisture management and flexibility. This sustainable hydrogel composite offers a promising, biodegradable alternative for effective wound care and medical waste reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Textile University
King Saud University
Ajman University
Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Northumbria University
Funding
College of Dentistry, King Saud University
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Kumari M, Keshri USP. Sch Bull 2015; 1: 271.
2. Pal S, Malairaman U. Screening of Phytochemicals From Azadirachta Indica and Curcuma Longa Using Cell Line Based Assay for Wound Healing. Solan: Jaypee University of Information Technology, 2022, vol HP.
3. 10.3390/molecules2717547510.3390/molecules27175475 ↗
4. 10.23910/2/2021.0437d10.23910/2/2021.0437d ↗
5. Alzohairy MA. Evidence based complement. Alternative Med 2016; 2016: 7382506.
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.22610.1016/j.msec.2017.03.226 ↗
7. Khatun M, Nur MA, Biswas S, et al. Assessment of the anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial activities of different types of turmeric (Curcuma longa) powder in Bangladesh. Food Res 2021; 6: 100201.
8. 10.3390/cosmetics903005810.3390/cosmetics9030058 ↗
9. Sireesha G, Srinija A, Yeshwanth J, et al. Formulation and evaluation of herbal ointment containing Neem and Turmeric extract. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2024; 13(10): 603–610.
10. Telange DR, Ganorkar SB, Shirkhedkar AA. Herb. Drugs manag. Inf Disp 2022; 263.
11. 10.3390/ma1405109510.3390/ma14051095 ↗
12. Garg S, Garg A, Vishwavidyalaya RD. Asian J Biomater Res 2016; 2: 163.
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0034510.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00345 ↗
14. 10.3390/pr901013710.3390/pr9010137 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.17210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.172 ↗
16. Gonçalves JO, Esquerdo VM, Sant’Anna Cadaval TR, et al. Med Wastewater Treat 2019; 1: 147.
17. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.04210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.042 ↗
18. Chatterjee R, Maity M, Hasnain MS, et al. Chitosan Drug Deliv. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 1–22.
19. Desai R, Pachpore R, Patil A, et al. Chitosan Biomater. III Struct. Relationships. Springer, 2021, pp. 23–74.
20. Morin-Crini N, Lichtfouse E, Torri G, et al. Sustain. Agric. Rev. 35 chitin chitosan hist. Fundam. Innov 2019; 49.
21. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.02310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.023 ↗
22. 10.3390/ijms24131073810.3390/ijms241310738 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11602510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116025 ↗
24. 10.3390/md2006036410.3390/md20060364 ↗
25. Mostolizadeh S. Alginate-Applications Futur. Perspect; 2024.
26. 10.3390/polym1421470710.3390/polym14214707 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11032110.1016/j.msec.2019.110321 ↗
28. 10.1177/0040517521101549610.1177/00405175211015496 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10924-023-02756-710.1007/s10924-023-02756-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12842210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128422 ↗
31. 10.1007/s42765-020-00044-w10.1007/s42765-020-00044-w ↗
32. 10.3390/gels1009057810.3390/gels10090578 ↗
33. 10.2174/157339981866622040110525610.2174/1573399818666220401105256 ↗
34. Dhinakaran M. Detailed study on the synergistic effect of neem extract loaded with curcumin in wound healing using textile substrate. Int Res J Pharm 2017; 8(7): 13–18.
35. 10.1177/004051751668863410.1177/0040517516688634 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.07310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.073 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.10530210.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105302 ↗