Studying the influence of micro-particles on the mechanical performance and damage failures of composite laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Composite materials are increasingly used in a broad range of applications due to their recognizable mechanical properties and the high strength-to-weight ratio. The aim of the current study is to improve the mechanical properties and fracture toughness of composite laminates. Several types of fabrics, such as glass, carbon, and Kevlar, and micro-particles are adopted to create composite laminates via the vacuum infusion method. The mechanical performances of the proposed laminates were evaluated via tensile and flexural strength tests. Moreover, the impact strength tests were conducted to examine their dynamic performances. Results showed that woven laminates such as glass woven, carbon woven, and Kevlar woven composites with micro-particles revealed better tensile properties compared with those without micro-particles. For instance, enhancement in the Young’s modulus with around 5%, 6%, and 13% were resulted from the glass, carbon, and Kevlar fabrics with fillers, respectively. Furthermore, higher impact strength and fracture toughness were obtained from the laminates of glass, carbon and Kevlar with inclusion of thermoplastic particles. For example, the glass, carbon and Kevlar fabrics composites with fillers samples showed improvement in the fracture toughness with around 24%, 17% and 14%, respectively. In addition, numerical simulation findings of flexural failure load and damage failure modes were in accordance with experimental results both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Applications · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Wasit
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.03910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.039 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11117510.1016/j.tws.2023.111175 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.01210.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.012 ↗
4. 10.1515/epoly-2014-019310.1515/epoly-2014-0193 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.03910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.039 ↗
6. Ferrigno TH. Principles of filler selection and use. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987.
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.030 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.03610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.036 ↗
11. 10.1515/epoly-2022-008010.1515/epoly-2022-0080 ↗
12. 10.1177/2634983321100750210.1177/26349833211007502 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.2541310.1002/app.25413 ↗
14. 10.1177/073168440707553310.1177/0731684407075533 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808372098720610.1177/1528083720987206 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11709-023-0996-410.1007/s11709-023-0996-4 ↗
17. Dalfi H. Improving the mechanical performance and impact damage tolerance of glass composite laminates via multi-scales of hybridisation. Proc IME J Mater Des Appl 2022; 236(12): 2339–2356.
18. 10.1177/0021998323119274410.1177/00219983231192744 ↗
19. Sierakowski RL. Damage tolerance in advanced composites. Lancaster, PA: Tecnomic Publishing Company, Inc, 1995, p. 2018.
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.037 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.13310.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.133 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00134-810.1016/S0266-3538(01)00134-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.014 ↗
25. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
26. Fu S, Lauke BJJOMS. Analysis of mechanical properties of injection molded short glass fibre (SGF)/calcite/ABS composites. J Mater Sci Technol 1997; 13: 389–396.
27. 10.1007/BF0240323410.1007/BF02403234 ↗
28. 10.1016/0032-3861(86)90038-810.1016/0032-3861(86)90038-8 ↗
29. 10.1002/pen.76011030510.1002/pen.760110305 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0116074310.1007/BF01160743 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.1981.07026071410.1002/app.1981.070260714 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:100442712338810.1023/A:1004427123388 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.008 ↗
34. Nash N, Young T, McGrail P, et al. Inclusion of a thermoplastic phase to improve impact and post-impact performances of carbon fibre reinforced thermosetting composites—a review. J Mater 2015; 85: 582–597.
35. Bhudolia SK, Gohel G, Subramanyam ESB, et al. Enhanced impact energy absorption and failure characteristics of novel fully thermoplastic and hybrid composite bicycle helmet shells. J Mater 2021; 209: 110003.
36. 10.3390/polym1422479310.3390/polym14224793 ↗
37. International A. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM international, 2007.
38. Internasional A. ASTM d256-00 standard test methods for determining the Izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: America Society for Testing and Material, 2000.
39. Bansal A, Gupta A, Pundir M, et al. Dynamic performance of particles loaded cross-plied GFRP composite. Int J Compos Mater 2012; 2(5): 67–71.
40. ASTM I. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM, D790-07, 2007.
41. 10.1177/0954406221103736310.1177/09544062211037363 ↗
42. 10.1177/1528083723117856710.1177/15280837231178567 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.1067110.1002/pc.10671 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
45. 10.1177/0731684424123316410.1177/07316844241233164 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.014 ↗
47. 10.1002/pen.2042910.1002/pen.20429 ↗
48. 10.4236/msa.2012.3706210.4236/msa.2012.37062 ↗