Analysis and prediction of woven fabric design impact on fabric/polymer composite drilling energy
Source abstract
Abstract
Damage, generated during drilling processes, will affect the material integrity and further delamination through the fiber-reinforced composite cross-section. Drilling is necessary for the assembly processes of composite parts. This article deals with the effect of the weave parameters on the drilling mechanism. The mechanism of the yarn shearing ring drilling was investigated, and the quality of the drilled hole was carefully examined for different drilling conditions. Set up for measuring the power consumption during the drilling of different samples as well as the value of the thrust force was constructed. In the drilling of fabric-reinforced polymer composite, the torque, thrust force, and delamination factor are depending directly on fabric design parameters. It was shown that both, drilling power and drilling thrust force, are proportional to the total specific fabric stiffness. Delamination caused by drilling thrust is one of the most problematic defects after drilling laminate composite. A drilling Index was developed and could be used to evaluate the effect of the fabric design of laminate on its composite drilling performance. It was revealed that significantly higher drilling power is needed for the plain weave fabric design than for the other fabric designs of the same unit repeat as well as for the laminates of high fiber volume fraction and high total flexural rigidity. Analysis of the delamination factor and the drilling power showed a high correlation with total fabric flexural rigidity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Engineering Technology and Methodologies · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11029-022-10014-510.1007/s11029-022-10014-5 ↗
2. Pandit GD · Int J Mater Sci Eng March · 2017 · 5 · 35
3. 10.3390/polym1208168110.3390/polym12081681 ↗
4. 10.1002/pen.2502210.1002/pen.25022 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.02110.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.021 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.028 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.012 ↗
8. 10.2514/6.2019-103610.2514/6.2019-1036 ↗
9. 10.1177/089270571984454610.1177/0892705719844546 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.03010.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.030 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61030-010.1016/S0007-8506(07)61030-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00011-410.1016/S0924-0136(99)00011-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.10.00810.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.10.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00097-110.1016/S0263-8223(02)00097-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.08.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.08.011 ↗
18. 10.1016/0890-6955(90)90138-910.1016/0890-6955(90)90138-9 ↗
19. Sankar B · J Basic Appl Eng Res October · 2014 · 1 · 19
20. 10.1002/pen.2520710.1002/pen.25207 ↗
21. 10.31399/asm.tb.scm.t5287030710.31399/asm.tb.scm.t52870307 ↗
22. Durão* L · Mater Mater · 2014 · 7 · 3803
23. Department of defense handbook, (composite materials handbook volume 3. polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysis) mil-hdbk-17-3e 23 January 1997. chapter 5:1–2.
24. Miller J · Sampe J · 2013 · 49 · 36
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.03910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.039 ↗
26. Sitek P · MODELOWANIE INŻYNIERSKIE Nr · 1896 · 55 · 88
27. Vishnupriya Ȧ · Int J Curr Eng Technol Spec Issue Feb · 2014 · 2 · 287
28. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.14610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.146 ↗
29. 10.1177/004051752199467610.1177/0040517521994676 ↗
30. Kalpakjian S · 1999
31. 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.08310.1016/j.procir.2012.04.083 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.002 ↗
33. Komanduri R · Mech Eng · 1997 · 115 · 58
34. 10.1007/978-0-387-68619-610.1007/978-0-387-68619-6 ↗
35. Liu F · Mater Compos Structures · 2012 · 94 · 15
36. Laza M · 2012
37. 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.1.210.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.1.2 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00170-019-04842-410.1007/s00170-019-04842-4 ↗
39. Mihoc G · Ann Oradea University Fascicle Management Technological Engineering · 2011 · 5
40. 10.1177/152808371774733510.1177/1528083717747335 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.009 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.01510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.015 ↗
43. 10.1177/002199831245160910.1177/0021998312451609 ↗
44. 10.1115/1.144831710.1115/1.1448317 ↗
45. El Messiry M. Protective Armor Engineering Design. Apple Academic Press. Published March 31 2021 by.
46. Xu J · Proc Imeche Part B: J Eng Manufacture · 2015 · 1 · 1
47. 10.1177/004051751989439310.1177/0040517519894393 ↗
48. 10.1177/1528083721100861610.1177/15280837211008616 ↗
49. 10.1177/004051751141628210.1177/0040517511416282 ↗
50. 10.1177/152808372199075210.1177/1528083721990752 ↗
51. Khudhayer J · Am J Mater Sci Eng · 2015 · 3 · 21
52. Sridharan S · 2008
53. Emin M · Tekstil Ve Konfeksiyon · October · 2008 · 4 · 263
54. Ismail S · 2017
55. 10.1177/002199831562029210.1177/0021998315620292 ↗