Extraction of cellulose nanofibrils from Ficus natalensis barkcloth and utilization in preparation of antimicrobial bio-nanocomposite films for possible food packaging applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, nanosized cellulose materials preparation has been extensively increased from the sources of sustainable materials and utilization in various functional applications as nanofillers. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) extraction through green bio-based materials featured as promising interest in the field of science. In this research, cellulose nanofibrils were extracted from a cellulose rich biomass Ficus natalensis barkcloth. Furthermore, extracted cellulose nanofibrils and Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) were mixed and casted to posterior analysis of formed sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) film at various concentrations of CNF (1 wt%, 5 wt%, 8 wt%, and 12 wt%) and fixed amount of ZnONPs (0.5wt%) based on CMC weight. Results revealed that CNF was smoothly distributed in the polymer matrix to form even and flexible films indicating the cellulose nanofibrils and zinc oxide are highly compatible with the CMC. Similarly, the water solubility percentage (WVP) of CMC film was low at lower content of CNF, and increased with the increase of CNF percentage. Addition of CNF and ZnONPs in nanocomposite films improved the thermal stability values and antibacterial activities of CMC films. Thus on the basis of various tremendous performance, this study showed that F.natalensis barkcloth could be considered as an alternative source of cellulose nanofibrils. Similarly, the prepared nanocomposite films can have potential application in packaging films for the extension of shelf life of fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
College of Textiles, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Funding
National Key Laboratory Foundation of China
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800723-5.00007-310.1016/B978-0-12-800723-5.00007-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13204-014-0316-310.1007/s13204-014-0316-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.clay.2014.05.02510.1016/j.clay.2014.05.025 ↗
4. 10.1002/polb.2171110.1002/polb.21711 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.056 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.014 ↗
7. 10.1080/1040839060084636610.1080/10408390600846366 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10692-016-9685-610.1007/s10692-016-9685-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008 ↗
10. 10.1021/am302624t10.1021/am302624t ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms15061104010.3390/ijms150611040 ↗
12. 10.2147/IJN.S6027410.2147/IJN.S60274 ↗
13. 10.1186/s40712-014-0025-410.1186/s40712-014-0025-4 ↗
14. 10.1155/2011/83787510.1155/2011/837875 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20180040910.1002/adfm.201800409 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma901005010.3390/ma9010050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.08210.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.082 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.020 ↗
19. Annamalai PK, Depan D. Nano-cellulose reinforced chitosan nanocomposites for packaging and biomedical applications. 489–506, 2015.
20. 10.1002/app.2369810.1002/app.23698 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2015.04.00310.1016/j.fpsl.2015.04.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.07910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.079 ↗
24. 10.3390/ijms15061104010.3390/ijms150611040 ↗
25. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818782-1.00014-610.1016/B978-0-12-818782-1.00014-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.021 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.02710.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.027 ↗
28. 10.1177/152808371988753310.1177/1528083719887533 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.010 ↗
30. Adeeyo O, Obanla O, et al. Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass 2015; 4(4): 14–19.
31. 10.1021/ie901998410.1021/ie9019984 ↗
32. 10.1002/star.20030024910.1002/star.200300249 ↗
33. 10.1201/9781420014495.ch310.1201/9781420014495.ch3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.02710.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.027 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.073 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.04.00310.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.04.003 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.056 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.002 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.035 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.022 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.01.00710.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.01.007 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14954510.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149545 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.foodres.2008.08.00510.1016/j.foodres.2008.08.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.01410.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.014 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.10.00110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.10.001 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.07.01710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.07.017 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.03.00710.1016/j.lwt.2014.03.007 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.04410.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.044 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.04510.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.045 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.004 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.030 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00287.x10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00287.x ↗
56. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.02010.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.020 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.030 ↗