Evaluation of electrospun polyurethane scaffolds loaded with cerium oxide for bone tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrospun polyurethane (PU) scaffolds were developed containing cerium oxide (CeO 2 ). Photomicrograph of the composites revealed the diameter of the PU/CeO 2 (264 ± 169 nm) was smaller than the polyurethane scaffold (994 ± 113 nm). The fabricated PU/CeO 2 (110° ± 1) scaffold displayed a more hydrophobic nature as depicted by increasing contact angle compared to the pristine PU (105° ± 3). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results presented evidence for the cerium oxide presence in the PU matrix through the formation of the hydrogen bond. The surface roughness of PU/CeO 2 (301 ± 52 nm) was reduced in comparison with pristine PU (854 ± 32 nm) as estimated in the atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Cerium oxide enhanced the thermal and tensile behaviour of the pristine PU. Coagulation assays indicated delayed clotting time and a less toxic nature to red blood cells of PU/CeO 2 than pristine PU. Further, the calcium deposition in the nanocomposites (10.5%) was higher compared to pure PU (2.4%) as showed in bone mineralization testing. Hence with these potent properties, PU/CeO 2 holds as a promising candidate for bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia
Bionanotechnology Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
IJN-UTM Cardiovascular Engineering Center, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Global Tissue Engineering Market Overview 2019: Focus on Technologies and Therapeutic Areas 2015-2024. www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190702005443/en/Global-Tissue-Engineering-Market-Overview-2019-Focus-on-Technologies-and-Therapeutic-Areas-2015-2024-ResearchAndMarkets.com (accessed 20 December 2020).
2. Bone Function: Why Do We Have Bones? www.healthline.com/health/bone-health/bone-function (accessed 5 June 2020).
3. 10.2147/IJN.S15124210.2147/IJN.S151242 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
5. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.1010.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep1480410.1038/srep14804 ↗
7. Marijanovic I, Antunovic M, Matic I, et al. In: Advanced techniques in bone regeneration. London: InTech, 2016.
8. 10.1007/s13770-017-0075-910.1007/s13770-017-0075-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00510.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.005 ↗
10. 10.2147/nano.2006.1.1.1510.2147/nano.2006.1.1.15 ↗
11. 10.1080/00202967.2018.145020910.1080/00202967.2018.1450209 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6RA14525F10.1039/C6RA14525F ↗
13. Akduman C. · 2017
14. Fernando S, McEnery M, Guelcher SA. Polyurethanes for bone tissue engineering. In: Stuart LC and Jianjun G (Eds) Advances in polyurethane biomaterials , 2016, pp. 481–501. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100614-6.00016-0 ↗
15. 10.2147/IJN.S21464610.2147/IJN.S214646 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12481710.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124817 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10595510.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105955 ↗
18. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0011310.3389/fbioe.2019.00113 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11151910.1016/j.msec.2020.111519 ↗
20. 10.1039/C6TB02391F10.1039/C6TB02391F ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b0015810.1021/acsami.6b00158 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11111110.1016/j.msec.2020.111111 ↗
23. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab067610.1088/1758-5090/ab0676 ↗
24. Babu KS · Int J Nanomed · 2014 · 9
25. 10.1080/1091581060095954310.1080/10915810600959543 ↗
26. Yan G. Advanced slot needleless electrospinning and air filtration properties of slot electrospun nanofibres. PhD Thesis, Deakin University, Australia, 2018.
27. 10.2147/IJN.S11226510.2147/IJN.S112265 ↗
28. 10.3390/polym1108132310.3390/polym11081323 ↗
29. 10.1080/10601325.2010.50800110.1080/10601325.2010.508001 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10118-018-2077-z10.1007/s10118-018-2077-z ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2498510.1002/pc.24985 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.020569910.1371/journal.pone.0205699 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.00510.1016/j.cej.2012.05.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.002 ↗
36. Ceylan M. Superhydrophobic behavior of electrospun nanofibers with variable additives, http://hdl. handle.net/10057/253 (2009, accessed 20 December 2020).
37. 10.1002/masy.20125100310.1002/masy.201251003 ↗
38. Li Y · J Nanomater · 2016 · 2016 · 1
39. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.01510.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.015 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2523710.1002/pc.25237 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12221-016-6350-x10.1007/s12221-016-6350-x ↗
42. 10.1080/1023666X.2019.159866510.1080/1023666X.2019.1598665 ↗
43. 10.1177/088532821351393410.1177/0885328213513934 ↗
44. 10.1002/app.3141810.1002/app.31418 ↗
45. 10.1163/092050610X51424110.1163/092050610X514241 ↗