journal article·2022-06Open access

The effect of the electrospinning setup on the surface energy of polycaprolactone nanofibre layers

Radek Jirkovec, Jakub Erben, Alzbeta Samkova, Jiri Chaloupek, Jiri Chvojka

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 5_suppl

Abstract

The study addresses changes in the surface energy of polycaprolactone nanofibre layers due to the different spinning electrodes. The value of surface energy and the associated wettability is an important aspect of polymeric biomaterials that influence the quality of interaction with biological material. The study involved the production of nanofibre layers by means of both needle and needleless electrospinning. The surface energy of the produced layers was determined via the contact angle measurement method. The experiment revealed that the spinning electrode exerts a significant effect on the resulting surface energy and, thus, on the wetting of the nanofibre layers. It was discovered during the measurement process, that the fibre layers produced via the needle electrospinning method evinced a low surface energy and are non-wettable/hydrophobic. In contrast, needleless electrospinning fibre layers evince a high surface energy and are wettable/hydrophilic.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Nonwovens and Nanofibrous Materials, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic

Department of Material Engineering, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic

Funding

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00019-310.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00019-3 ↗
2. 10.1186/1477-7827-1-10210.1186/1477-7827-1-102 ↗
3. 10.1533/9780857097231.110.1533/9780857097231.1 ↗
4. 10.1177/088532821037214810.1177/0885328210372148 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100575-0.00006-110.1016/B978-0-08-100575-0.00006-1 ↗
6. 10.1098/rsif.2005.004110.1098/rsif.2005.0041 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978-1-4377-4469-9.00003-210.1016/B978-1-4377-4469-9.00003-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63509-9.00002-910.1016/B978-0-444-63509-9.00002-9 ↗
9. Park S-J · 2011 · 59
10. 10.1007/s10853-020-05116-110.1007/s10853-020-05116-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00323-410.1016/S0927-7757(99)00323-4 ↗
12. Dhandayuthapani B · IntSci J Polym · 2011 · 2011 · 1687
13. 10.1016/B978-1-4557-2598-4.00012-510.1016/B978-1-4557-2598-4.00012-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12728110.1016/j.matlet.2019.127281 ↗
15. 10.1080/00914037.2015.110324110.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0050310.1021/acsomega.0c00503 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.3684310.1002/app.36843 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.10010.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.100 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.3128210.1002/app.31282 ↗
20. 10.1155/2012/83931710.1155/2012/839317 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.01810.1016/j.apm.2016.06.018 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-0-323-51270-1.00007-810.1016/B978-0-323-51270-1.00007-8 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.290796710.1063/1.2907967 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.3553810.1002/app.35538 ↗
25. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.018610.1089/ten.tea.2009.0186 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.07.02410.1016/j.ejps.2018.07.024 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.8b1499510.1021/acsami.8b14995 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10974810.1016/j.matdes.2021.109748 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11009610.1016/j.matdes.2021.110096 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813215-9.00003-810.1016/B978-0-12-813215-9.00003-8 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1202033510.3390/polym12020335 ↗