journal article·2023-09Open access

Ballistic performance of multi-layer fabric panels considering fabric structure and inter-yarn friction

Yanyan Chu, Yingying Liu, Mohammad Fahaduzzaman, Md.Riazur Rahman, Weihan Huang, Shichen Li, Chao Chen, Dan Yang, Xiaogang Chen

Abstract

The importance of inter-yarn friction to ballistic fabric has been widely investigated. However, the couple effects of inter-yarn friction, fabric structure and number of layers have not been explored. Therefore, this paper put forward to investigate the ballistic performance of multi-layer fabric panels with different weave structure and inter-yarn friction. Three different structures (plain, sateen and UD-like), various number of layer (1-layer, 4-layer, 8-layer and 12-layer) and three levels of coefficients of friction were considered and their effects on the ballistic performance will be discussed through finite element (FE) method. The impact velocity is set as 475 m/s and the projectile is a 1 g steel flat cylinder with both the diameter and height of 5.5 mm. It has been found that the sateen fabric structure with 12-layer and higher coefficients of friction firstly reduces the projectile velocity to zero, while the corresponding plain structure and the UD-like structure reduce the projectile velocity to 125 m/s and 200 m/s individually, which indicates that when the number of layer and coefficients of friction are both much larger, the sateen fabric shows the best ballistic performance among the three structures. The reasons behind are as following. As far as the structure concerned, sateen structure has more interlacements than UD-like fabric and more straight sections than plain fabric. In addition, at higher coefficients of friction, this structure enables higher stress distribute in more layers and in larger areas than plain fabric and UD-like fabric and give rise to a layer-by-layer fracture but not fracture simultaneously.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Institute of Textile and Clothing Industries, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China

College of Textiles, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China

School of Materials Science & Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, China

Department of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Funding

The Fundamental Research Funds of Zhongyuan University of Technology · 4th Leading Innovative Talents Cultivation Project of Changzhou City · The Natural Science Foundation of Zhongyuan University of Technology · School Start-up Fund Project of Changzhou University · Discipline Strength Enhancement Plan of Zhongyuan University of Technology · Textile Vision Science & Education Foundation

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.09810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.098 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10798610.1016/j.tws.2021.107986 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11294110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112941 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11096610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110966 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.03410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.034 ↗
7. Mukesh B · Compos Struct · 2020 · 255 · 112941.1
8. 10.1177/00405175920620090210.1177/004051759206200902 ↗
9. 10.1177/105678951349524610.1177/1056789513495246 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.008 ↗
11. Figucia F. Energy absorption of Kevlar fabric under ballistic impact. Natick: Army Natick Research & Development Command; 1980. Report No.: AD-A090390.
12. 10.1016/0015-0568(80)90011-110.1016/0015-0568(80)90011-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.01410.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.014 ↗
14. Mukesh B · Compos Commun · 2022 · 29 · 10098
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.10463710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104637 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12412510.1016/j.polymer.2021.124125 ↗
17. 10.1002/nme.159610.1002/nme.1596 ↗
18. 10.1080/15376494.2011.57553210.1080/15376494.2011.575532 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.022 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751245076510.1177/0040517512450765 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.09910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.099 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.05.00510.1016/j.jmps.2012.05.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.030 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10443-011-9202-210.1007/s10443-011-9202-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10342110.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103421 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.01310.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.013 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11382410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113824 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.055 ↗
32. Huang CY · J Eng Fibers Fabr · 2023 · 18 · 1
33. 10.1177/004051751351531110.1177/0040517513515311 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.08210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.082 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.019 ↗