In-plane shear properties of para-aramid (Kevlar®) fabric by yarn pull-out method
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the in-plane shear properties of para-aramid fabrics by the pull-out method. For this purpose, Kevlar®29 and Kevlar®129 type fabrics were used. Fabric width/length ratio and the number of pull-out ends were identified as important testing parameters. After the yarn in the fabric was pulled from the top ravel region before the start of the crimp extension stage, it was found that fabric shear strength increased when the number of pulled ends increased. On the other hand, when the fabric width/length ratio decreased, fabric shear strength increased. The shear force and angle values in Kevlar®29 fabric were higher than in Kevlar®129 fabric due to high fabric density. Fabric shear rigidity was also identified for each Kevlar fabric. The number of pulled ends and the fabric width/length ratios influenced fabric shear rigidity. It was observed that the shear rigidity values in Kevlar®29 fabric were high compared to those of Kevlar®129 fabric due to high fabric areal density. Also, the shear jamming angles were found to be based on the number of pulled ends. Fabric local shearing properties could be identified by pulling the yarn ends in various regions of the fabric. This could be important for the handling of the fabric during formation. The results generated from this study showed that para-aramid fabric shear could be measured by the yarn pull-out test.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Faculty, Department of Textile Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 Talas-Kayseri, Turkey
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu J. Structure and mechanics of woven fabrics. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 2004, pp. 118–120.10.1533/9781845690403 ↗
2. 10.1177/00405175570270080310.1177/004051755702700803 ↗
3. 10.1177/00405175610310020110.1177/004051756103100201 ↗
4. 10.1177/00405175660360120510.1177/004051756603601205 ↗
5. Treloar L.R.G · JText Inst · 1965 · 56 · T533
6. Kawabata S. Textile structural composites. New York: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., 1989, pp. 67–116.
7. 10.1108/0955622951008711910.1108/09556229510087119 ↗
8. 10.1080/1944702630865991010.1080/19447026308659910 ↗
9. 10.1177/00405175680380091110.1177/004051756803800911 ↗
10. Hearle J.W.S, Grosberg P, Backer S. Structural mechanics of fibres, yarn and fabrics. New York: Wiley Interscience Inc., 1969, pp. 371–410.
11. Saville B.P. Physical testing of textiles. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 1999, pp. 267–295.10.1533/9781845690151 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.016 ↗
13. Domskience J · Fiber Text East Eur · 2005 · 13 · 26
14. Dolatabadi MK. Anisotropy in tensile properties of plain weave fabric. MSc Thesis, Technická Univerzita V Liberc, Liberec, Czech Republic, 2009.
15. 10.1177/00405175990690111110.1177/004051759906901111 ↗
16. 10.1177/00405175710410110110.1177/004051757104101101 ↗
17. Cavallaro PV, Sadegh AM, Quigley CJ and Johnson AR. Effects of coupled biaxial tension and shear stresses on decrimping behavior in pressurized woven fabrics. NUWC-NPT Technical Report No. 11571, Newport, Rhode Island, 2004.10.21236/ADA429070 ↗
18. 10.1177/00405175910610070710.1177/004051759106100707 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175970670080710.1177/004051759706700807 ↗
20. 10.1177/00405175760460120210.1177/004051757604601202 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00081-010.1016/S1359-835X(99)00081-0 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175040740101210.1177/004051750407401012 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175040740101210.1177/004051750407401012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.019 ↗
25. 10.1177/004051751039170310.1177/0040517510391703 ↗
26. 10.1177/004051751039600010.1177/0040517510396000 ↗