journal article·2020-04

Fabrication and characterization of tailor-made novel electrospun fibrous polyurethane scaffolds decorated with propolis and neem oil for tissue engineering applications

Saravana Kumar Jaganathan, Mohan Prasath Mani, Rajasekar Rathanasamy, Praseetha Prabhakaran

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 49· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Recently, textile technologies have gained a huge attention for fabricating the tissue constructs. In tissue engineering, the development of biodegradable polymer scaffolds which resemble the native function of the extra cellular matrix is a great challenge. In this research, a novel electrospun scaffold based on polyurethane, propolis and neem oil was developed for tissue-engineering applications through textile technology like electrospinning. The morphology of the electrospun polyurethane/propolis and polyurethane/propolis/neem oil exhibited reduced fibre and pore diameter than the pristine polyurethane. The change in the chemical structure of the electrospun composites was identified by peak shifting of CH band peak with hydrogen bond formation.The contact angle measurements revealed that the PU/propolis mat was found to be super hydrophilic (0°) in nature and the electrospun polyurethane/propolis/neem oil mat was observed to be hydrophilic (41° ± 1) in nature. Thermogravimetric analysis and atomic force microscopy analysis showed that the prepared polyurethane/propolis and polyurethane/propolis/neem oil mats exhibited higher thermal stability and decreased surface roughness than the pristine polyurethane. Moreover, the developed polyurethane/propolis (activated partial thromboplastin time – 144 ± 4 s and prothrombin time – 85 ± 3 s) and polyurethane/propolis/neem oil (activated partial thromboplastin time – 147 ± 3 s and prothrombin time – 86 ± 2 s) composite displayed decreased blood clotting time than the pristine polyurethane (activated partial thromboplastin time – 153 ± 3 s and prothrombin time – 89 ± 3 s). The results of the haemolytic assay indicated that the electrospun polyurethane/propolis (1.21%) and polyurethane/propolis/neem oil (1.30%) mats exhibited better safety to red blood cells than the pristine polyurethane (2.48%). Hence, these desirable characteristics of the newly developed scaffold might be used as a potential platform for tissue engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Bee Products Chemical Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

IJN-UTM Cardiovascular Engineering Center, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Castells-Sala C · J Biochips Tissue Chips · 2013 · 2 · 1
2. 10.46582/jsrm.010100310.46582/jsrm.0101003 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.4569110.1002/app.45691 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.027 ↗
5. 10.1083/jcb.54.3.62610.1083/jcb.54.3.626 ↗
6. 10.1002/bdrc.2000210.1002/bdrc.20002 ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.1910.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.19 ↗
8. 10.1242/jcs.0038310.1242/jcs.00383 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat182210.1038/nmat1822 ↗
10. 10.1002/adhm.20150051710.1002/adhm.201500517 ↗
11. Jayaraman K · J Nanosci Nanotechnol · 2004 · 4 · 52
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.00510.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.005 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp905667s10.1021/jp905667s ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.07110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.071 ↗
15. Ayyar M, Mani MP, Jaganathan SK, et al. Surface, thermal and hemocompatible properties of novel single stage electrospun nanocomposites comprising polyurethane blended with bio oilTM. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2017; 89: 2411–2422.10.1590/0001-3765201720170230 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.b.1005810.1002/jbm.b.10058 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nano.2014.01.01010.1016/j.nano.2014.01.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00090-210.1016/S0142-9612(97)00090-2 ↗
19. 10.1021/bm025595010.1021/bm0255950 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.82028030710.1002/jbm.820280307 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00191-X10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00191-X ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00423-X10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00423-X ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 ↗
24. 10.1163/ej.9789004165939.i-49610.1163/ej.9789004165939.i-496 ↗
25. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69777610.1080/01694243.2012.697776 ↗
26. 10.1155/2017/861281910.1155/2017/8612819 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.06210.1016/j.msec.2014.07.062 ↗
28. 10.1155/2013/30824910.1155/2013/308249 ↗
29. 10.3390/molecules1901007810.3390/molecules19010078 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2355410.1002/pc.23554 ↗
31. De La Taille A, Hayek OR, Buttyan R, et al. Effects of a phytotherapeutic agent, PC-SPES, on prostate cancer: a preliminary investigation on human cell lines and patients. BJU Int 1999; 84: 845e50.10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00285.x ↗
32. Reuter J · 2009 · 33
33. 10.1002/ptr.211010.1002/ptr.2110 ↗
34. 10.1300/J044v07n04_0510.1300/J044v07n04_05 ↗
35. 10.1055/s-2008-107453310.1055/s-2008-1074533 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00924.x10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00924.x ↗
37. 10.1055/s-0030-125074310.1055/s-0030-1250743 ↗
38. Al-Bayaty FH · Nat Prod Res · 2011 · 26 · 423e9
39. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.00310.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.003 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.09.01410.1016/j.jep.2009.09.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.026 ↗
42. 10.1155/2016/738250610.1155/2016/7382506 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0298067710.1007/BF02980677 ↗
44. Singh N · Ind J Pharmacol · 1997 · 13 · 102
45. Kher A · Ind Drugs · 1997 · 15 · 41
46. 10.2147/IJN.S11226510.2147/IJN.S112265 ↗
47. 10.1002/pat.413410.1002/pat.4134 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.495857510.1063/1.4958575 ↗
49. 10.3390/molecules19121961010.3390/molecules191219610 ↗
50. 10.1039/c0np00072h10.1039/c0np00072h ↗
51. 10.1155/2013/69739010.1155/2013/697390 ↗
52. 10.1093/ecam/neh05910.1093/ecam/neh059 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.04610.1016/j.jep.2005.01.046 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.04310.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.043 ↗
55. 10.1088/1748-6041/6/5/05500110.1088/1748-6041/6/5/055001 ↗
56. Tarun K · Ind J Fibre Text Res · 2012 · 3 · 127
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.00510.1016/j.cej.2012.05.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.03910.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.039 ↗
59. Jahani H · Cell J (Yakhteh) · 2012 · 14 · 31
60. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.04110.1016/j.msec.2017.07.041 ↗
61. 10.1080/00914037.2016.119092610.1080/00914037.2016.1190926 ↗
62. Bhugul VT · Int J Adv Innovat Res · 2013 · 2 · 159
63. 10.2147/IJN.S12341710.2147/IJN.S123417 ↗
64. 10.3390/jfb203023010.3390/jfb2030230 ↗
65. 10.1080/00405000.2017.134129510.1080/00405000.2017.1341295 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.008 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.03210.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.032 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.029 ↗
69. 10.1155/2014/96462110.1155/2014/964621 ↗
70. Szycher M · 1991
71. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d010.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d0 ↗