journal article·2022-06Open access

Comparative studies on the effect of fabric structure on mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites

Zhenyu Ma, Pingze Zhang, Jianxun Zhu

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 1_suppl

Abstract

The application of carbon fiber/epoxy composites places more requirements on the selection of fabrics to meet the needs of structural components. Due to the large design space for reinforced fabric patterns, the relationship between the reinforcements and properties is essential to further understand. Four typical fabrics were manufactured in this research, named non-interlaced bidirectional fabrics, plain weave laminated fabrics, angle-interlock fabrics and bidirectional angle-interlock fabrics. The structural features of fabrics were analyzed by using representative geometric unit, and the symmetry properties were discussed based on group theory. Vacuum assistant resin transfer molding was adopted to obtain the corresponding resin matrix composite specimens. Quasi-static tensile and bending tests were conducted on these specimens. The stress-strain curves of specimens were illustrated, and the failure characterizations were also analyzed in mesoscopic scale. The results showed that the high crimp of yarns reduced the stability of composites. Both the tensile and flexural properties were affected by the curvature of yarns. The research results provided a theoretical basis for the selection of fabric structure and the application of carbon fiber/epoxy composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

Sinoma Science Technology Co Ltd., Nanjing, China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.010 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168441350401910.1177/0731684413504019 ↗
3. 10.1177/073168441246913610.1177/0731684412469136 ↗
4. 10.1177/004051751143501310.1177/0040517511435013 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443-008-9073-310.1007/s10443-008-9073-3 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0318364410.1007/BF03183644 ↗
7. 10.1177/155892501988996010.1177/1558925019889960 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11153910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111539 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168441351825510.1177/0731684413518255 ↗
11. 10.1080/1023666X.2015.98907610.1080/1023666X.2015.989076 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.06710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.067 ↗
13. 10.1080/00405000.2017.133371910.1080/00405000.2017.1333719 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.011 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831668118710.1177/0021998316681187 ↗
17. 10.1590/S1516-1439200600010001610.1590/S1516-14392006000100016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.02010.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.020 ↗
19. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1134.14710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1134.147 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2367010.1002/pc.23670 ↗
21. 10.1177/073168441775105910.1177/0731684417751059 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.003 ↗
24. 10.1155/2019/843953010.1155/2019/8439530 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.022 ↗
26. 10.1177/004051751665937610.1177/0040517516659376 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.014 ↗