journal article·2022-06Open access

Mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of agave fibers bio-based epoxy laminates reinforced with zinc oxide

Mauricio Torres, Victoria Renteria Rodriguez, Perla Itzel Alcantara, Edgar Franco-Urquiza

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 4_suppl

Abstract

Biolaminates of Ixtle and Henequen natural fibers reinforced bio-based epoxy resin were prepared using Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion process. ZnO nanoparticles were added to the bio-based epoxy resin at 1, 2 and 3 wt. % content before impregnation process. The viscoelastic and mechanical properties, as well as the fracture behavior, were evaluated and related to the nature of the fibers and filler content. The viscoelastic results indicated the ZnO particles are effective fillers just at low concentrations, and induce different reinforcement mechanisms attributed to the interaction between the nature of fibers and nanoparticles. The mechanical properties of the Ixtle biolaminates decreased at higher filler concentrations, while Henequen biolaminates showed better mechanical properties just above the 2 wt. % of ZnO. The fracture behavior in mode I registered moderate changes in toughness, related to the ZnO fraction, which promoted different behaviors on the interlaminar adherence of the layers. The results point to the need to continue evaluating the potential application of these green composites for their use in construction and automotive industries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT – CIDESI), National Center for Aeronautics Technologies (CENTA), Querétaro, México

Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Querétaro, Querétaro

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.10610.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.106 ↗
2. Trujillo-barragán M, I UADI, Zacatecas UA De. Caracterización de materiales compuestos de matriz polimérica con fibra de ixtle. In: XVIII Congreso Internacional Anual De La Somim. Salamanca , Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana De Ingenieria Mecanica, pp. 673–682.
3. Pawlak C. A Survey of standards for the U . S . Fiber/ Textile/Apparel lndustry. Gaithersburg, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=821424 (1996).10.6028/NIST.IR.5823 ↗
4. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0022610.3389/fmats.2019.00226 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.00310.1016/j.procs.2019.05.003 ↗
6. Salman SD. Effects of jute fibre content on the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of the composites in structural applications. Def Technol 2020; 16: 1098–1105.10.1016/j.dt.2019.11.013 ↗
7. Mahesh V, Joladarashi S, Kulkarni SM. Influence of laminate thickness and impactor shape on low velocity impact response of jute-epoxy composite: FE study. In: Materials Today: Proceedings . Elsevier, pp. 545–550.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.216 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.07910.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.079 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.09.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.09.019 ↗
10. Kılınç AÇ · 209
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10643710.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106437 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.029 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.stmat.2018.05.00410.1016/j.stmat.2018.05.004 ↗
14. Li Y · 165
15. 10.1039/C4GC00459K10.1039/C4GC00459K ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.015 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0083510.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00835 ↗
18. Auvergne R · Chem Rev
19. 10.3390/molecules2201014910.3390/molecules22010149 ↗
20. Dholakiya B. · Polyester · 2012 · 7 · 167
21. 10.1007/s10973-011-2097-110.1007/s10973-011-2097-1 ↗
22. 10.3390/met504238310.3390/met5042383 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.002 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40090-016-0107-710.1007/s40090-016-0107-7 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10965-017-1355-810.1007/s10965-017-1355-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.01610.1016/j.wear.2007.01.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.00210.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10833210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108332 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10570-015-0620-410.1007/s10570-015-0620-4 ↗
30. 10.1155/2012/65635310.1155/2012/656353 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40145-013-0069-610.1007/s40145-013-0069-6 ↗
32. 10.1155/2013/49787310.1155/2013/497873 ↗
33. Osman D · J Nanosci Nanoeng · 2015 · 1 · 248
34. 10.1021/ja01121a01910.1021/ja01121a019 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.06010.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.060 ↗
36. Peng G · Polym Adv Technol · 2008 · 19 · 162910.1002/pat.1179 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.01310.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.013 ↗
38. Gheith H · J Mater Res Technol · 2018 · 8
39. 10.1088/2053-1591/aad58e10.1088/2053-1591/aad58e ↗
40. 10.1166/jnn.2010.145810.1166/jnn.2010.1458 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.161920210.1063/1.1619202 ↗
42. 10.1002/app.1286910.1002/app.12869 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2535710.1002/pc.25357 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.03210.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.032 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.08010.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.080 ↗
46. 10.1177/004051751774115610.1177/0040517517741156 ↗
47. 10.1177/004051751244905210.1177/0040517512449052 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
49. 10.1177/00219983910250080210.1177/002199839102500802 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.08110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.081 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.028 ↗
52. AC and · J Mater Sci Eng · 2016 · 5
53. 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.03210.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.032 ↗
54. 10.1002/adv.2190510.1002/adv.21905 ↗
55. 10.1177/147592171456840310.1177/1475921714568403 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.008 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.003 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.09.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.09.001 ↗