Experimental verification of theoretical prediction of fiber to fiber contacts in electrospun multilayer nano-microfibrous assemblies: Effect of fiber diameter and network porosity
Source abstract
Abstract
Average number of fiber-to-fiber contacts in a fibrous structure is a prerequisite to investigate the mechanical, optical and transport properties of stochastic nano-microfibrous networks. In this research work, based on theoretical analysis presented for the estimation of the number of contacts between fibers in electrospun random multilayer nanofibrous assembles, experimental verification for theoretical dependence of fiber diameter and network porosity on the fiber to fiber contacts has been provided. The analytical model formulated is compared with the existing theories to predict the average number of fiber contacts of nanofiber structures. The effect of fiber diameters and network porosities on average number of fiber contacts of nano-microfiber mats has been investigated. A comparison is also made between the experimental and theoretical number of inter-fiber contacts of multilayer electrospun random nano-microfibrous networks. It has been found that both the fiber diameter and the network porosity have significant effects on the properties of fiber-to-fiber contacts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Engineering Department, Textile Excellence & Research Centers, Amirkabir University of Technology Hafez Ave, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University Waurn Ponds Geelong, Australia
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/004051751142076610.1177/0040517511420766 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.a.3437910.1002/jbm.a.34379 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10973-012-2386-310.1007/s10973-012-2386-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.09710.1016/j.msea.2012.02.097 ↗
6. 10.1177/00405175940640090510.1177/004051759406400905 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175930630060510.1177/004051759306300605 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0015-1882(98)90341-X10.1016/S0015-1882(98)90341-X ↗
9. 10.1016/S0015-1882(98)90341-X10.1016/S0015-1882(98)90341-X ↗
10. 10.1023/A:101242942517110.1023/A:1012429425171 ↗
11. 10.1023/A:102329882039010.1023/A:1023298820390 ↗
12. 10.1098/rsif.2005.003910.1098/rsif.2005.0039 ↗
13. 10.1177/004051750707674810.1177/0040517507076748 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983940280160110.1177/002199839402801601 ↗
15. 10.1016/0032-5910(94)02850-810.1016/0032-5910(94)02850-8 ↗
16. 10.1023/A:100459712179710.1023/A:1004597121797 ↗
17. 10.1023/A:102652922960110.1023/A:1026529229601 ↗
18. Dodson CTJ · J Pulp Paper Sci · 1996 · 22 · 165
19. 10.1177/00405175770470010410.1177/004051757704700104 ↗
20. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000021453.00080.5a10.1023/B:JMSC.0000021453.00080.5a ↗
21. Bagherzadeh R · Text Res J
22. Niskanen K · J Pulp Paper Sci · 2002 · 28 · 228
23. 10.1007/PL0002193510.1007/PL00021935 ↗
24. Sampson WW · J Pulp Paper Sci · 2005 · 31 · 127