journal article·2014-07

Silver nanoparticles loaded thermosensitive cotton fabric for antibacterial application

Sunil Kumar Bajpai, Manjula Bajpai, Leena Sharma, Murali Mohan Yallapu

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 44· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Cotton fabric with improved antibacterial properties is always invited for effective use in wound dressing and healing applications. In this study, poly( N-isopropyl acrylamide) network has been produced in situ in porous cotton cellulose fabric by photo polymerization using UV-radiation. The thermoresponsiveness of the resulting fabric has been used to entrap silver nanoparticles with the fabric. The presence of silver nanoparticles in the fabric has been characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering analysis. The fabrics have been found to possess fair mechanical properties. The individual and aggregation particle size of the silver nanoparticles was found to be in the range 13–20 nm and 140–220 nm. This aggregation phenomenon was also confirmed by dynamic light scattering measurement, i.e. 256 nm. The silver nanoparticles exhibits polydispersity index 0.18 and zeta potential −2.86 mV. The fabric exhibited fair biocidal action against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, thus indicating its possible utility in medicinal application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Polymer Research Laboratory, Government Model Science College, India

Cancer Biology Research Center, Sanford Research/USD, USA

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.00810.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.03.00910.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.03.009 ↗
3. Rajendran R · Int J Eng Sci Technol · 2010 · 2 · 202
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.06.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.06.028 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.00310.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.003 ↗
6. 10.1080/1060132070178699210.1080/10601320701786992 ↗
7. Gupta P · J Cotton Sci · 2008 · 12 · 280
8. 10.1002/app.3406510.1002/app.34065 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.03910.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.039 ↗
10. 10.1088/1742-6596/187/1/01207210.1088/1742-6596/187/1/012072 ↗
11. Kutanaee HN · Afr J Microbiol Res · 2011 · 5 · 1842
12. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.02010.1016/j.addr.2006.09.020 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00396-008-1949-010.1007/s00396-008-1949-0 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma202057710.3390/ma2020577 ↗
15. 10.1163/156856209X41010210.1163/156856209X410102 ↗
16. Sundaram V · 2004
17. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.01.00210.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.01.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.03.00710.1016/j.bios.2010.03.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.01.00210.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.01.002 ↗
20. 10.1039/b909603e10.1039/b909603e ↗
21. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.10.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.10.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.05.00810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.05.008 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10534-011-9482-x10.1007/s10534-011-9482-x ↗
24. 10.1088/1748-6041/5/4/04410310.1088/1748-6041/5/4/044103 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00253-009-2159-510.1007/s00253-009-2159-5 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12030-009-9029-110.1007/s12030-009-9029-1 ↗