Thermal stability analysis of nano-particulate-filled phenolic-based friction composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This research article reports the thermal stability behaviour of nano-particulates (multiwalled carbon nanotube and nanoclay)–filled Kevlar-lapinus fibre-reinforced phenolic resin–based friction composite under oxygen atmosphere using thermogravimetric analysis. To analyse the damage assessment of the proposed nano-particulates–filled composites under thermal surroundings, the thermograph of the composites are generally divided into three major temperature zones (i.e. zone-1, zone 2 and zone-3). Temperature of zone-1 ranges from 30℃ to 350℃, zone-2 from 350℃ to 600℃ and finally zone-3 from 600℃ to 900℃. It has also been noticed that in zone-1 the friction composite shows relatively lower magnitude of thermal stability; thereafter, the decomposition rate accelerates with steep drop in thermal stability in zone-2. As heat supply continued to zone-3, the composite degradation rate gradually accelerates. The incorporation of nano-particulates indicated a remarkable improvement in the thermal stability of Kevlar/lapinus fibre combination reinforced friction composites. Furthermore, the result shows that nanoclay surpassed multiwalled carbon nanotube with regard to the thermal stability of friction formulations. This investigation confirms that nano-particulates–filled Kevlar/lapinus fibre-reinforced friction composites possess excellent potential to be used as high temperature–resistant friction materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Manav Bharti University, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, MNIT, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, HNBU, India
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.1028910.1002/pc.10289 ↗
2. 10.1243/095440704185677310.1243/0954407041856773 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.00310.1016/j.wear.2004.03.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.wear.2013.03.05310.1016/j.wear.2013.03.053 ↗
5. 10.1023/B:TRIL.0000044516.75340.2510.1023/B:TRIL.0000044516.75340.25 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.wear.2008.08.00810.1016/j.wear.2008.08.008 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10853-008-3041-z10.1007/s10853-008-3041-z ↗
8. 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00142-810.1016/S0043-1648(99)00142-8 ↗
9. 10.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.v3.i3.1010.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.v3.i3.10 ↗
10. Singh T · Walailak J Sci Technol · 2013 · 10 · 343
11. Herring JM. Mechanisms of brake fade in organic brake pad lining. SAE technical paper no. 670146, 1967.10.4271/670146 ↗
12. 10.1016/0043-1648(74)90169-010.1016/0043-1648(74)90169-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/0043-1648(77)90010-210.1016/0043-1648(77)90010-2 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11249-006-9055-210.1007/s11249-006-9055-2 ↗
15. Fu H · Iranian Polym J · 2008 · 17 · 493
16. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00849-310.1016/S0043-1648(01)00849-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.wear.2003.12.01710.1016/j.wear.2003.12.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tca.2010.09.00810.1016/j.tca.2010.09.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.016 ↗
20. 10.1080/1040200940898332910.1080/10402009408983329 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0301-679X(00)00087-610.1016/S0301-679X(00)00087-6 ↗
22. Briscoe BJ and Tweedale PJ. Aramid fibre friction: A replacement for asbestos in high friction materials. In: Proceedings of conference on tribology of composites materials, Oak Ridge, TN, 1–3 May May 1990, pp.252–263. ASM international, Materials Park, Ohio, USA.
23. 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06723-X10.1016/0043-1648(95)06723-X ↗
24. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00802-X10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00802-X ↗
25. Singh T and Patnaik A. Performance assessment of lapinus-aramid based brake pad hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking. Arch Civil Mech Eng. Epub ahead of print 23 February 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.01.009.10.1016/j.acme.2014.01.009 ↗
26. 10.1177/073168440504356110.1177/0731684405043561 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.00910.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.009 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2069010.1002/app.20690 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.wear.2005.10.01110.1016/j.wear.2005.10.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.wear.2009.09.00310.1016/j.wear.2009.09.003 ↗
31. Singh T, Patnaik A and Satapathy BK. Effect of carbon nanotubes on tribo-performance of brake friction materials. AIP Conf Proc 1393: 223–224.10.1063/1.3653690 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11665-012-0325-x10.1007/s11665-012-0325-x ↗
33. 10.1063/1.481019910.1063/1.4810199 ↗
34. 10.1142/S179329201350025210.1142/S1793292013500252 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00530-510.1016/S0040-6031(01)00530-5 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm00047a00610.1021/cm00047a006 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.08010.1016/j.wear.2006.12.080 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm010305s10.1021/cm010305s ↗
39. 10.1002/polb.2006810.1002/polb.20068 ↗
40. 10.1023/A:100482892315210.1023/A:1004828923152 ↗
41. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00194-810.1016/0008-6223(95)00194-8 ↗
42. 10.4209/aaqr.2009.08.005310.4209/aaqr.2009.08.0053 ↗
43. 10.1002/app.2037410.1002/app.20374 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.00510.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.005 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.02.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.02.001 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.02710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.027 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.003 ↗
48. 10.1002/pc.2028410.1002/pc.20284 ↗