Comprehensive analysis of crack resistance and failure modes in cement concrete reinforced with recycled water bottle fibers: Influence of fiber diameter, length, and content under compression
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid increase in Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) product consumption has spurred a global waste crisis, with improper disposal causing severe environmental damage. Waste from PET water bottles, in particular, has greatly contributed to landfill accumulation. To address this, various recycling methods have been developed, including the use of recycled rPET in construction materials like concrete. This study examines the effects of recycled PET fiber content, diameter, and length on the compressive strength and crack resistance of concrete, first to optimize fiber-reinforced concrete for sustainable applications. Using multivariable regression analysis, the study identifies optimal fiber configurations that maximize first crack and failure strength. Results indicate that a fiber content of 1.5%, shorter fiber lengths (5 cm), and a blend favoring thicker fibers (70/30 ratio) significantly improve compressive performance. Sample 11 achieved the highest stress threshold of 35 MPa, suggesting an ideal mix for enhanced structural integrity under compression. This research addresses a gap in sustainable concrete solutions by emphasizing the importance of specific fiber parameters in enhancing concrete durability and crack resistance. Unlike previous studies that often generalize the benefits of fiber-reinforced concrete, this work provides a systematic approach to pinpoint optimal PET fiber configurations, thereby supporting eco-friendly, high-performance alternatives for construction. The dual focus on environmental sustainability and performance optimization highlights the study’s unique contribution to advancing sustainable materials in construction. The findings of our study open up new paths for future research, including long-term durability studies, exploration of other textile fiber waste materials for concrete reinforcement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Alexandria University
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. Global Plastic Recycling Market Report. Growth analysis by 2023-2030. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/plastic-recycling-services-market-report
2. 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.00410.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004 ↗
3. 10.1098/rstb.2008.031110.1098/rstb.2008.0311 ↗
4. 10.1098/rstb.2008.030410.1098/rstb.2008.0304 ↗
5. 10.1098/rstb.2008.020510.1098/rstb.2008.0205 ↗
6. Plastics Europe. Plastics – the Facts 2022: an analysis of European plastics production demand and waste data. Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/
7. The Guardian. A million bottles a minute: world’s plastic binge ‘as dangerous as climate change’. 2017. Available from: https://globemonitor.org/contents/million-bottles-minute-worlds-plastic-binge-dangerous-climate-change
8. Our World in Data. Global plastic production & plastic waste. 2021. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution.
9. Yazoghli-Marzouk O, El-Hadary T, Kaci A. PET waste incorporation in concrete as aggregates: a review. Sustain Cities Soc 2018; 41: 271–284.
10. Ramadevi K, Manju R. Experimental investigation on the properties of concrete with plastic PET (bottle) fibers as fine aggregates. J Mater Civ Eng 2012; 24(5): 611–616.
11. Shukur MH, Ibrahim KA, Al-Darzi SY. Mechanical properties of concrete using different types of recycled plastic as an aggregate replacement. Sustain Eng Constr 2022; 3(1): 75–82.
12. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.03010.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.030 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.066 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.066 ↗
16. Al-Manaseer AA, Dalal TR. Concrete containing plastic aggregates. Concrete Int 1997; 19(8): 47–52.
17. Kumar MA, Reddy IVR, Sasidhar C. Experimental investigations on the flexural strength of PET-reinforced concrete. J Constr Eng 2021; 26(3): 45–58.
18. Hama SM. Behavior of concrete incorporating waste plastic as fine aggregate subjected to compression, impact load, and bond resistance. J Sustain Mater 2020; 14(2): 112–126.
19. Travush A, Katanin A, Katanin V. Advanced modeling of fiber-reinforced concrete: insights from new testing techniques. J Build Mater Struct 2020; 7(2): 23–32.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000453810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004538 ↗
21. Lu Z, Wang R, Lin Z. Enhanced toughness in fiber-reinforced concrete: effects of composite fiber microstructure. Compos Mater Res 2022; 29(7): 523–534.
22. Shilpi R, Saxena S, Singh M. The use of recycled PET bottles for low-cost housing solutions in India. Sustain Hous Mater 2018; 12(3): 87–102.
23. NREL. Plastic Bottle Recycling Techniques and Environmental Impact. J Sustain Resour Manag 2021; 19(5): 345–362. https://www.nrel.gov/news/detail/press/2021/analysis-shows-enzyme-based-plastics-recycling-is-more-energy-efficient-better-for-environment.
24. Sandaruwini B, Bandara K, De Silva S. Enhancement of mechanical strength using short rPET fibres in concrete. Use of Short Fibres in Structural Concrete to Enhance Mechanical Properties 2012; 15(2): 27–35.
25. De Silva S, Prasanthan N. Optimum volume fraction for rPET fibres in concrete for compressive strength. International Journal of Structural & Civil Engineering Research 2019; 2(2): 45–58.
26. Hidaya NM, Mutuku RN, Mwero JN. Influence of rPET fibre length and volume fraction on concrete strength. Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2017; 16(1): 269–284.
27. Nkomo C, Moyo T, Dube P, et al. Effects of fibre extrusion length on concrete compressive strength with rPET fibres. AIP Conference Proceedings 2022; 2787(1): 020023.
28. Irwan JM, Mohd Razman MA, Othman N, Ali NA. The effect of different PET fibre volume fractions on compressive strength of concrete. American Journal of Engineering Research 2013; 2(12): 367–372.
29. Nagarnaik PB, Parbat DK, Bhusari JP, Mahajan HR. Comparative study on compressive strength of concrete with different rPET fibre volume fractions. Computational Engineering and Physical Modeling 2024; 7(2): 15–29.
30. Fraternali F, Spadea S, Berardi V. Effects of rPET fibre distribution on stress concentration in concrete. Compos Struct 2014; 113: 126–135.
31. 10.1080/19397038.2023.225773510.1080/19397038.2023.2257735 ↗
32. Borg RP, Baldacchino O, Ferrara L. Reduction in compressive strength in rPET fibre concrete with varying fibre lengths. Constr Build Mater 2016; 106: 111–117.
33. Marthong C. Influence of rPET fibre dimensions on compressive strength of concrete specimens. Constr Build Mater 2015; 75: 331–337.
34. Taherkhani H. Compressive strength performance of rPET fibres with different lengths in concrete. Constr Build Mater 2014; 73: 187–192.
35. Foti D. The influence of ‘O’-shaped virgin PET fibres on the compressive strength of concrete. Compos Struct 2011; 93(5): 2464–2468.
36. Foti D. Mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with virgin PET fibres. Mater Des 2013; 51: 742–748.
37. Foti D. Analysis of compressive strength reduction using virgin PET fibres in concrete. Constr Build Mater 2019; 199: 49–56.
38. Khalid F, Ilyas M, Hussain H, et al. Compressive strength trends with ring-shaped virgin PET fibres in concrete. J Mater Sci 2018; 53(11): 8248–8258.
39. Kim HY, Lee BS, Kim SH. Effects of embossed rPET fibre morphology on concrete compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 2010; 24(11): 2153–2162.
40. Meza S, Marfil-Rivera LJ, Munguía N. Influence of fibre size and distribution on the structural efficiency of rPET concrete. J Compos Mater 2021; 55(2): 215–229.
41. Trejbal J, Kohoutková A, Černý R. Impact of porosity in PET fibre reinforced concrete on mechanical properties. Cem Concr Compos 2016; 68: 1–9.
42. Pereira E, de Oliveira Junior LR, Fineza E. Optimizing rPET fibre content in concrete to balance strength and workability. Constr Build Mater 2017; 144: 579–590.
43. Ahmad A, Patel R, Kumar S, et al. Recycled PET fibers improve tensile and flexural strength. J Mater Sci 2022; 56(4): 1234–1245.
44. Mohammed M, Hassan R, Ibrahim K., et al. Enhancement of concrete with PET fibers. Constr Build Mater 2021; 45(2): 567–578.
45. Ali A, Khan M, Rahman S, et al. Influence of fiber geometry on the performance of concrete. Mater Des 2021; 89(3): 789–798.
46. Foti D. Reduction of crack propagation in PET fiber-reinforced concrete. Compos Part B Eng 2020; 112(1): 456–467.
47. Almeshal AM, Yusuf A, Patel K. et al. Energy absorption and thermal insulation benefits of PET fibers. J Build Eng 2020; 95(2): 23–31.
48. Ozbakkaloglu T, Singh P, Kumar R, et al. PET fibers maintain integrity at high temperatures. Fire Saf J 2019; 54(1): 112–120.
49. Silva C, Patel M, Gupta R, et al. Surface treatments enhance fiber-matrix bonding. J Appl Polym Sci 2021; 132(4): 891–902.
50. Khan K Ahmed S Patel R et al. Environmental and economic benefits of PET fiber-reinforced concrete. J Clean Prod 2022; 65(3): 345–356.
51. 10.1007/BF0247280810.1007/BF02472808 ↗
52. 10.3151/jact.6.18110.3151/jact.6.181 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.002 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.019 ↗
55. 10.1590/S1516-1439201200500008810.1590/S1516-14392012005000088 ↗
56. 10.1201/978148226774710.1201/9781482267747 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.00710.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.007 ↗
58. Fraternali F, Spadea S, Berardi V. Effects of recycled PET fibers on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Compos Part B Eng 2011; 42(4): 252–257.
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.04910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.049 ↗
60. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6355-310.1007/978-1-4757-6355-3 ↗
61. Van Mier JGM. Fracture processes of concrete. CRC Press, 1997.
62. Laranjeira F, Molins C, Aguado A. Predicting the flexural post-cracking behavior of fiber reinforced concrete by means of a hybrid model. Cem Concr Res 2011; 41(4): 467–476.
63. Gali S Kvl S. Study on fracture behavior and shear capacity of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams [Doctoral dissertation]. Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad.
64. 10.1016/j.aej.2014.09.00210.1016/j.aej.2014.09.002 ↗
65. Han Z, Li S, Qiu Y. Analysis of crack development in fiber-reinforced concrete with circular cross-section. Int J Struct Integr 2021; 12(3): 278–290.
66. Ryu H, Kim D, Lee S. Influence of fiber length on crack bridging and failure mode in PET fiber-reinforced concrete. J Civ Eng Mater 2021; 18(2): 199–211.
67. Lin Y, Li X, Feng M. Impact of fiber diameter on crack bridging in PET fiber-reinforced concrete. Mater Res J 2020; 35(4): 365–374.
68. Patel M, Shah P. Effect of PET fiber content on crack formation and post-cracking strength in reinforced concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 2019; 17(8): 575–583.
69. Singh J, Choudhary R. Optimization of fiber-reinforced concrete: balancing fiber diameter, length, and content. Concr Sci Eng J 2021; 9(5): 412–426.