journal article·2024-01Open access

Experimental study on filtration performance of geotextile filter used in emergency rescue of dike piping

Di Feng, Shi Lai Jiang, Sheng Liu

Abstract

Geotextiles, as a type of common filtration material, have broad prospects in emergency rescue of dike backward erosion piping (BEP). To investigate the filtration performance of geotextile in BEP emergency rescue, several experiments were conducted using nonwoven and woven geotextiles to simulate the process of rescuing BEP with geotextiles. The influence of geotextile specifications and types on hydraulic compatibility of the filter system was analyzed, and the clogging mechanism of geotextile during dealing with BEP was revealed at a microscopic level. The results showed that the nonwoven geotextile filter with an equivalent pore size of 0.103 mm had a gradient ratio value of less than 3, and it had a highest flow rate of 260 mL/min. Increasing the thickness and pore size of nonwoven geotextiles within a certain range helped enhance their anti-clogging ability. The main mechanism of clogging in nonwoven geotextiles was the deposition of fine sand particles on their surface, forming a layer of low permeability soil. Plain woven geotextiles experienced severe clogging with a 42% reduction in flow rate, and it was not suitable for rescuing BEP. The clogging mechanism of woven geotextile involved the blocking of horizontal water passages by fine sand particles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Dam Engineering and Safety · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11440-022-01545-110.1007/s11440-022-01545-1 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11440-019-00848-010.1007/s11440-019-00848-0 ↗
3. 10.1080/19648189.2011.971484410.1080/19648189.2011.9714844 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.01010.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.010 ↗
5. 10.1680/jgein.16.0002110.1680/jgein.16.00021 ↗
6. 10.1177/1528083722111940510.1177/15280837221119405 ↗
7. 10.1031/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000152810.1031/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001528 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.10.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.10.003 ↗
9. 10.1177/1528083721106102210.1177/15280837211061022 ↗
10. 10.1680/jgein.20.0004610.1680/jgein.20.00046 ↗
11. 10.1177/0040517523116786110.1177/00405175231167861 ↗
12. 10.1680/jgein.21.0004710.1680/jgein.21.00047 ↗
13. 10.1520/GTJ2022027910.1520/GTJ20220279 ↗
14. 10.1680/jgein.21.00038a10.1680/jgein.21.00038a ↗
15. 10.3390/w1601010710.3390/w16010107 ↗
16. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-805310.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8053 ↗
17. Yan C · Adv Sci Technol Water Resour · 2009 · 29 · 44
18. Zhang B-S · Yellow River · 2003 · 25 · 38
19. 10.1680/gein.2005.12.4.16210.1680/gein.2005.12.4.162 ↗
20. 10.1139/t85-02910.1139/t85-029 ↗
21. 10.1031/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000450210.1031/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004502 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.07.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.07.003 ↗
23. Giroud JP · 2010
24. 10.1680/jgein.16.0002110.1680/jgein.16.00021 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.02.00110.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.02.001 ↗
26. 10.3390/w909066010.3390/w9090660 ↗
27. 10.1031/9780784480472.02910.1031/9780784480472.029 ↗