Enhancement of silk fabric knife-stabbing resistance for soft body armor
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional silk, known for its strength, flexibility, and comfort, shows promise as a lightweight, comfortable material for stab-resistant armor. This study explores enhancing silk’s knife-stabbing resistance for soft body armor through surface treatments. This study aims to augment the knife-stabbing resistance of silk fabric for soft body armor. Designed a falling tower setup to investigate fabric responses under impact. Exploring the addition of layers with coatings like silicon dioxide deposition, rice ash deposition, and aluminum oxide particles, the investigation revealed significant enhancements. A solitary silk layer exclusively coated with resin exhibited improvements of approximately 37.07%, 29.21%, and 13.47% in stab resistance for rice ash, aluminum oxide, and silicon oxide particles, respectively. The specific knife penetration depth indicated that the coating is more effective in diminishing penetration depth. The research identified that 7 layers of pure silk and 3 layers coated with rice ash satisfy National Institute of Justice Standard–0115.00, S1 as 26 layers of silk fabric, demonstrating a reduction without compromising protective efficacy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen G · 2018
2. Alil LC · 2004
3. El Messiry M · Fibres Text East Eur · 2014 · 22 · 71
4. 10.2478/aut-2021-001310.2478/aut-2021-0013 ↗
5. Choi HN, Hong TM, Lee EH, et al. Stab resistance of aramid fabrics reinforced with silica STF. In: 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, 6th to 8th January 2023, Tokyo, Japan, 2011.
6. 10.1142/9789812772572_003410.1142/9789812772572_0034 ↗
7. 10.1177/152808371245290010.1177/1528083712452900 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808371142914410.1177/1528083711429144 ↗
9. 10.1080/00405000.2018.149698810.1080/00405000.2018.1496988 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751666907510.1177/0040517516669075 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0094-5765(99)00103-410.1016/S0094-5765(99)00103-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jcfm.2004.10.01110.1016/j.jcfm.2004.10.011 ↗
13. 10.1515/aut-2003-03010210.1515/aut-2003-030102 ↗
14. 10.1177/1528083721100861610.1177/15280837211008616 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808372096470310.1177/1528083720964703 ↗
16. 10.1201/978042905723610.1201/9780429057236 ↗
17. Weber MO, Aumann S, Vidzem B, et al. Comparison of different yarns for stab resistant knitted fabrics (oral presentation). 47th IFKT Congress, Izmir, Turkey, 2014.
18. 10.1177/152808371455144110.1177/1528083714551441 ↗
19. Croft J · 2007
20. 10.1007/978-3-319-47408-3_1110.1007/978-3-319-47408-3_11 ↗
21. Aumann S · 2013 · 28
22. ASTMF1342/F1342M-05(2022) · 2022
23. NIJ Standard–0115 · 2020
24. Horsfall I · 2000
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.09910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.099 ↗
26. 10.1177/00405175810510020510.1177/004051758105100205 ↗
27. Wang L · 2007
28. Javaid MU · 2019
29. 10.1177/004051751989439310.1177/0040517519894393 ↗
30. El Messiry M · 4B1_0181_ slicing cuts on triaxial fabric using roboticcontrolled razor blade · 2019 · 14
31. 10.1177/152808372199075210.1177/1528083721990752 ↗
32. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101273-4.00014-710.1016/B978-0-08-101273-4.00014-7 ↗
33. Mahbub RF · 2015
34. 10.1088/1742-6596/2460/1/01210010.1088/1742-6596/2460/1/012100 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10885610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108856 ↗
36. 10.1177/152808371879265510.1177/1528083718792655 ↗