journal article·2022-06Open access

Entropy-based Taguchi–Grey relational analysis for multi-output optimization of coating parameters in MoS 2 -coated sugar palm fiber and its characterization

Unnikrishnan Thekkeparambil Gopalaswamy, Panneerselvam Kavan

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 2_suppl

Abstract

Polymer composites using high-performance natural fibers have several practical uses in industry. The effect of molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) coating on sugar palm fiber (SPF) is investigated in this study. The fiber surface is modified using the osmosis technique with different process parameters such as concentrations of MoS 2 , temperature, and time. The multi-output optimization (MOO) method is used to study the influence of the coating parameter on tensile strength and coating density. The chemical, morphological and thermal stability of the sample synthesized by optimum parameters are analyzed and compared with raw-sugar palm fiber (R-SPF). The processing time is the parameter that strongly influences the tensile strength and coating concentration. The Field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) observations indicate the successfulness of MoS 2 coating over the raw palm fiber surface. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) results indicate that the crystallinity index (CI) of the coated fiber has increased significantly compared to R-SPF. The MoS 2 physisorption on the R-SPF surface is verified by Fourier’s transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy. Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) results reveal that the thermal stability of modified-sugar palm fiber (M-SPF) increased significantly relative to the R-SPF. The hydrophobicity of the R-SPF was also significantly improved as a result of the coating. This method shows an excellent methodology for developing high-potential natural fiber to manufacture high-performance natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Production Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12221-011-0919-110.1007/s12221-011-0919-1 ↗
2. 10.1177/20412479160070020210.1177/204124791600700202 ↗
3. Satyanarayana KG · Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect C Eng Sci · 1981 · 4 · 419
4. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.02010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.02110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.021 ↗
6. Wichman IS · Adv Compos Technol · 1993 · 265
7. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.03010.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.030 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808371453471010.1177/1528083714534710 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.00110.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.001 ↗
10. 10.1142/S0218625X1950104X10.1142/S0218625X1950104X ↗
11. 10.1007/s12221-018-8033-210.1007/s12221-018-8033-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.13610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.136 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0070610.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00706 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.1c0884410.1021/acsami.1c08844 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.00410.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.004 ↗
16. 10.5962/p.32467810.5962/p.324678 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.006 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10973-011-1785-110.1007/s10973-011-1785-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e0016110.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00161 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0422410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04224 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.5b0231210.1021/acsami.5b02312 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5TA01720C10.1039/C5TA01720C ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0076210.1021/acsami.5b00762 ↗
24. 10.1039/c4nr01208a10.1039/c4nr01208a ↗
25. 10.1080/15583724.2017.130966210.1080/15583724.2017.1309662 ↗
26. Lin C · Proc - 10th IEEE Int Work Futur Trends Distrib Comput Syst · 2004 · 19 · 209
27. Julong D · Jouranal Grey Syst · 1989 · 1 · 1
28. Chen CB · J Technol · 2000 · 15 · 25
29. 10.1080/15440478.2019.157915610.1080/15440478.2019.1579156 ↗
30. 10.1177/0887302X1986626110.1177/0887302X19866261 ↗
31. 10.1007/s13204-011-0051-y10.1007/s13204-011-0051-y ↗
32. 10.1177/152808372093030410.1177/1528083720930304 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831349491410.1177/0021998313494914 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.03.00510.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.03.005 ↗
35. Sivaprasad PV · J Sci Ind Res (India) · 2019 · 78 · 223
36. Wen K-L · 1998 · 1842
37. 10.7569/JRM.2016.63412810.7569/JRM.2016.634128 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00270-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00270-1 ↗
39. 10.1080/15440478.2017.132151310.1080/15440478.2017.1321513 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00170-009-1973-310.1007/s00170-009-1973-3 ↗
41. 10.1177/152808372094261410.1177/1528083720942614 ↗
42. Merzoug A · J Ind Text · 2020 · 1
43. 10.1039/C6CP07302F10.1039/C6CP07302F ↗
44. 10.1007/s11249-011-9774-x10.1007/s11249-011-9774-x ↗
45. 10.1016/0040-6031(86)85092-410.1016/0040-6031(86)85092-4 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.003 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.197910.1002/app.1979 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122803 ↗