The use of the Box–Behnken experimental design to model tensile strength of spunlaced fabrics and evaluating fabrics behaviour in acidic condition
Source abstract
Abstract
Determining the tensile strength of nonwoven fabrics is one of the important factors considered for operational performance of the fabrics, especially for fabrics that are exposed to acidic condition. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) and polyimide (PI) fibres are used to produce fabrics that can withstand harsh chemical condition and still possess the required tensile strength; however, over a period of time the tensile strength gradually decreases. The Box–Behnken design method results showed that it can model and describe the effects of process parameters on the tensile strength of spunlaced fabrics in both cross direction and machine direction. The contour plots’ results indicate that varying the fibres polyacrylonitrile (−1), polyphenylene sulfide (0) and polyphenylene sulphide/polyimide (1) from −1 to 1 increases the fabric tensile strength in both machine direction and cross direction. For water jet pressure 60 bar (−1), 80 bar (0) and 100 bar (1), increasing the pressure from −1 to 1 increases the fabric tensile strength in cross direction but in the machine direction the fabric strength decreases. Increasing the fabric area weight of 440 g/m 2 (−1), 500 g/m 2 (0) and 560 g/m 2 (1) from −1 to 1 decreases the tensile strength. Exposing fabrics to sulphuric acid (H2SO4) decreases the fabric tensile strength in both machine direction and cross direction due to the degradation of the fibres and the loss decreases gradually with the duration of exposure. For PAN fabrics, the tensile strength decreases by 21% and that of PPS and PPS/PI fabrics decrease by 10% and 6%, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technology Station: Clothing and Textiles, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
Department of Clothing and Textile Technology, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
School of Communication and Design, RMIT University, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Funding
National Research Foundation
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.06810.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.068 ↗
2. 10.5772/274810.5772/2748 ↗
3. 10.1533/9780857098450.110.1533/9780857098450.1 ↗
4. 10.1080/00405167.2018.146192110.1080/00405167.2018.1461921 ↗
5. Russell SJ. · 2007
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.10.00810.1016/j.indcrop.2015.10.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.01.00610.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.01.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00074-410.1016/S0266-3538(01)00074-4 ↗
9. 10.1080/0040500070177056310.1080/00405000701770563 ↗
10. Renaud CM, Greenwood ME. In: 9th EFUC meeting, Wroclaw, Poland, November 2005.
11. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.05110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.051 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.08.03310.1016/j.fuproc.2016.08.033 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.03.00110.1016/j.ces.2012.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.12.01310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.12.013 ↗
15. 10.1002/ceat.20150028210.1002/ceat.201500282 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.01010.1016/j.desal.2009.03.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.supflu.2010.10.01710.1016/j.supflu.2010.10.017 ↗
18. Maduna L · J Ind Text
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.03510.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.035 ↗
20. EN ISO 13934-1. Textiles-tensile properties of fabrics – part 1 : determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method . Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2013.
21. Wright DC · Rapra Rev Rep · 2001 · 11
22. Patnaik A · J Appl Polym Sci · 2010 · 117 · 132510.1002/app.30561 ↗
23. 10.1177/152808370706950910.1177/1528083707069509 ↗