journal article·2022-06Open access

Oil sorption properties of cotton comber noil/recycled polyester blended needle punched nonwoven fabrics- An optimization study

S Viju, G Thilagavathi, N Keertana

Abstract

Oil spill pollution is a constant threat to the environment nowadays. The treatment of an oil spill remains a challenge to environmental scientists. Among the various cleanup methods available, the use of sorbents for oil spill cleanups is a popular approach. In this work, an attempt has been made to produce cotton comber noil /recycled polyester needle punched nonwoven fabrics for the oil spill clean-up process. Box–Behnken experimental design is used to optimise the parameters such as cotton comber noil /recycled polyester blend proportion, needle punching density and areal density for maximum oil sorption capacity. At 70:30 cotton comber noil /recycled polyester blend proportion, 64.94 needle punching density and 100 GSM, maximum oil sorption was achieved. The maximum oil sorption achieved in the case of crude oil and vegetable oil is 45.90 g/g and 32.30 g/g respectively. The cotton comber noil/recycled polyester needle punched nonwoven fabric showed a stable water bead morphology with a static contact angle of 133.6. The present work indicates that the cotton comber noil/recycled polyester needle punched nonwoven fabric (70/30) is a potential sustainable product for oil spill removal applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Textile materials and evaluations · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Hussein M · J Pet Technol Altern Fuels · 2011 · 2 · 132
2. 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00042-010.1016/S0025-326X(03)00042-0 ↗
3. 10.1177/1528083721104086310.1177/15280837211040863 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.04.00510.1016/j.biortech.2004.04.005 ↗
5. 10.1021/es900166v10.1021/es900166v ↗
6. 10.1021/es00028a01610.1021/es00028a016 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.11.04410.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.11.044 ↗
8. 10.1108/RJTA-06-2020-006110.1108/RJTA-06-2020-0061 ↗
9. Jintao W · Ind Crops Prod · 2012 · 40 · 178
10. 10.1177/152808371878753210.1177/1528083718787532 ↗
11. 10.1080/09593330.2021.197216810.1080/09593330.2021.1972168 ↗
12. 10.1177/152808371561363010.1177/1528083715613630 ↗
13. Viju S · J Inst Eng India Ser E · 2018 · 100 · 1
14. Brindha R · J Nat Fibers · 2019 · 17 · 1
15. 10.1177/152808371986287910.1177/1528083719862879 ↗
16. 10.1080/15440478.2020.185365210.1080/15440478.2020.1853652 ↗
17. Choi HM · J Environ Sci Health · 1996 · 31 · 1441
18. 10.1021/ie400594210.1021/ie4005942 ↗
19. 10.1021/ie501943610.1021/ie5019436 ↗
20. 10.1177/152808372199936010.1177/1528083721999360 ↗
21. Muthu Kumar N · J Nat Fibers · 2020
22. 10.1080/00405000.2018.155088910.1080/00405000.2018.1550889 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10692-017-9815-910.1007/s10692-017-9815-9 ↗
24. 10.1177/152808371559158110.1177/1528083715591581 ↗
25. 10.1177/152808370934712110.1177/1528083709347121 ↗
26. Desai AN · Indian J Fiber Text Res · 1994 · 19 · 53
27. Buckley JS · Oil Gas Sci Technol · 1998 · 53 · 303
28. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.04010.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.040 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.02810.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.028 ↗