Numerical investigations into the response of fabrics subjected to ballistic impact
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of high-performance fibres for ballistic protection has made it possible to produce lightweight soft body armour. This provides more mobility and comfort to body armour users such as soldiers and police officers. Efforts to design more protective body armour at a reduced weight have ever continued. Ballistic impact modelling, which provides an in-depth understanding of the energy absorption mechanism of ballistic fabrics, plays an important role in designing lightweight soft body armour. This paper reports the results of numerical investigations into the stress distribution and failure mode of ballistic fabrics subjected to high-velocity impact. Finite-element (FE) models were built up and used to predict the response of ballistic fabric systems. The research confirmed that the fabric is able to absorb more impact energy with enhanced yarn–yarn friction, indicating that, if by special weaving techniques of yarn–yarn friction increase, an improvement in ballistic performance might be expected. It was also predicted from the FE simulation that yarn–yarn friction not only influence the projectile engagement time with the fabric, but also plays an important role in stress distribution on the primary and the secondary yarns. In addition, theoretical prediction from a multi-ply fabric system showed that the front layers of fabric are more likely to be broken in shear, and the rear layers of fabric tend to fail in tension. This suggested that using shear resistant materials for the front layer and tensile resistant materials for the rear layer may improve the ballistic performance of fabric panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textile Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China
School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Kocer HB · 2007
2. Shim VPW, Lim CT and Foo KJ. Dynamic mechanical properties of fabric armour . Int J Impact Eng 200; 25: 1–15.10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00038-5 ↗
3. Shim VPW · Int J Impact Energy · 1995 · 6 · 605
4. 10.1177/00405175920620090210.1177/004051759206200902 ↗
5. Cunniff PM and Ting J. Decoupled response of textile body armour. In: Proceedings of the 18th international symposium of ballistics , 1999, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp.814–821.
6. Karahan M, Kus A, Eren R, et al. Investigation of ballistic properties of woven-unidirectional hybrid panels according to energy absorption capabilities. In: SAMPE’07 conference, Baltimore, MD, 7–8 June 2007.
7. 10.1177/00405175580280040210.1177/004051755802800402 ↗
8. 10.1177/00405175970670070710.1177/004051759706700707 ↗
9. 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00054-Z10.1016/0734-743X(94)00054-Z ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00137-310.1016/S1359-8368(02)00137-3 ↗
11. Hamouda AMS and Hashmi MSJ. In: Bulson PS (ed) Simulation of the impact of a tool steel projectile into copper, mild-steel, stainless-steel (304) test specimens , in structures under shock and impact . Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1992, pp.51–61.
12. Shockey DA, Erlich DC and Simons JW. Improved Barriers to Turbine Engine Fragments . Interm Report III, 2001.
13. 10.1177/002199830404477610.1177/0021998304044776 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.002 ↗
15. Zhang GM, Batra RC and Zheng J. Effect of frame size frame type and clamping pressure on the ballistic performance of soft body armour. Compos Part B 2008; 39: 476–489.10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.012 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10443-011-9202-210.1007/s10443-011-9202-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.05.00510.1016/j.jmps.2012.05.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.05.00610.1016/j.jmps.2010.05.006 ↗
24. 10.1080/00405000.2010.52927910.1080/00405000.2010.529279 ↗
25. Shanahan WJ · Textile Res J · 1978 · 69 · 92
26. Hearle JWS · Text Res J · 2001 · 92 · 53
27. Zhou Y · 2013 · 154
28. DSM, DSM Dyneema high-strength, high-modulus polyethylene fiber fact sheet, 2008.
29. 10.1080/0040500900865872110.1080/00405009008658721 ↗
30. Grujicic M · Mater Des Appl · 2008 · 222 · 259
31. Lin H · Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 16 · 1
32. Boedeker. Polyethylene specifications. http://www.boedeker.com/polye_p.htm (accessed 30 August 2010).
33. Bunsell AR. Compressive strength , in Composite material series-2 . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1988, Chapter 10.
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.022 ↗
35. Zeng XS · Int J Impact Eng · 2006 · 66 · 1309
36. Briscoe BJ · Text Res J · 1992 · 158 · 229
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.019 ↗
38. ABAQUS Inc. ABAQUS 6.10 PDF documentation. http://abaqus.ethz.ch:2080/v6.11/books/gsa/default.htm (accessed 26 September 2011).
39. Chen X, Zhu F and Wells G. An analytical model for ballistic impact on textile based body armour . Compos Part B 2012; 45: 1508–1514.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.005 ↗