A review on the recent developments in design and integration of electromyography textile electrodes for biosignal monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to recent developments in wearable sensor technology, textile electrodes are routinely being employed in electromyography (EMG) for continuous monitoring of the biosignals from the muscles. However, the performance of such smart textile-based health monitoring devices depends on several factors such as, the sensitivity (impedance), durability (reusable/washable), users' comfort ability, integrability, and automatability. In this article we review the characteristics and the performance of the EMG textile electrodes, in the context of functional textile materials, smart textile materials, and smart textile systems for biosignals monitoring. The functional textile materials are confined to signal transmission alone, whereas, the smart textile materials include signal transducers and sensors. The more advanced smart textile systems include signal conditioning circuits with displays. Nowadays, textile-based sensors embedded in garments are becoming a part of users' normal life, in particular, the textile systems that continuously monitor the vital physiological signals from muscles are being sought after in healthcare settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
Jimma Institute of Technology (JiT), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Scientific and Didactic Laboratory of Nanotechnology and Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Biomedical Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma, Ethiopia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.5772/intechopen.9243910.5772/intechopen.92439 ↗
2. 10.1108/RJTA-12-02-2008-B00710.1108/RJTA-12-02-2008-B007 ↗
3. 10.1533/978184569293310.1533/9781845692933 ↗
4. 10.1177/152808371663280810.1177/1528083716632808 ↗
5. 10.5772/intechopen.10021210.5772/intechopen.100212 ↗
6. Butola BS · 2020
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.08410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.084 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.08.00910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.08.009 ↗
9. Lee JW, Golgouneh A, Dunne L. Comparative assessment of wearable surface emg electrode configurations for biomechanical applications, 2019, Boston, Massachusetts.
10. 10.1109/JSEN.2013.228342410.1109/JSEN.2013.2283424 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051751982899210.1177/0040517519828992 ↗
12. 10.1145/3123021.312306810.1145/3123021.3123068 ↗
13. Esfandiari A · World Appl Sci J · 2008 · 3 · 470
14. 10.3390/polym1421471310.3390/polym14214713 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.smaim.2021.11.00110.1016/j.smaim.2021.11.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.06110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.061 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.01510.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.015 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11581-018-2680-610.1007/s11581-018-2680-6 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7SE00339K10.1039/C7SE00339K ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1102034510.3390/polym11020345 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.07110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.071 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-379-9.00007-410.1016/B978-1-78242-379-9.00007-4 ↗
23. Khan J · J Emerg Technol Innov Res · 2019 · 6 · 836
24. Lu K · 2018
25. 10.1177/154193121862118210.1177/1541931218621182 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20190195810.1002/adma.201901958 ↗
27. 10.3390/s2103081410.3390/s21030814 ↗
28. Meul J. Study of electro-conductive contacts in hybrid woven fabrics. PhD thesis. Belgium: Ghent University Ghent, 19 October 2015.
29. Kareem FR · 2017
30. Cram JR · 2011 · 1
31. Jamal MZ · Comput Intell Electromyogr Anal- Perspect Curr Appl Future Chall · 2012 · 18 · 427
32. Ghapanchizadeh H, Ahmad SA, Ishak AJ, et al. Review of surface electrode placement for recording electromyography signals. Biomed Res 0970-938X: 28.
33. Aced López S · 2012
34. 10.1093/ptj/73.10.69810.1093/ptj/73.10.698 ↗
35. 10.1128/AAC.6.5.63710.1128/AAC.6.5.637 ↗
36. 10.3390/s13091243110.3390/s130912431 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1324581510.3390/ma13245815 ↗
38. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100558110.1371/journal.pcbi.1005581 ↗
39. Farina D · Surf Electromyogr Physiol Eng Appl · 2016 · 1
40. 10.1002/0471732877.emd01310.1002/0471732877.emd013 ↗
41. 10.1155/2019/921025810.1155/2019/9210258 ↗
42. Bard AJ · 2001
43. Oliveira CC, Machado da Silva J, Trindade IG, et al. Characterization of the electrode-skin impedance of textile electrodes. In: Design of circuits and integrated systems. Madrid, Spain: IEEE, pp. 1–6.
44. Cram JR · 2011
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1058210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582 ↗
46. Kazani I, Hertleer C, Mey G, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the sweat/textile electrode interface. J Nat Tech Sci AJNTS.
47. 10.1109/TIM.2018.280695010.1109/TIM.2018.2806950 ↗
48. 10.3390/bioengineering303002010.3390/bioengineering3030020 ↗
49. 10.1109/MeMeA.2013.654975810.1109/MeMeA.2013.6549758 ↗
50. Govyadinov P, Turovets S, Gunn A, et al. Direct current conditioning to reduce the electrical impedance of the electrode to skin contact in physiological recording and stimulation. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv171101059.
51. 10.3390/s14122375810.3390/s141223758 ↗
52. 10.1109/TIM.2013.228907210.1109/TIM.2013.2289072 ↗
53. 10.3390/mi1304062910.3390/mi13040629 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.05.03210.1016/j.sna.2017.05.032 ↗
55. 10.3390/s14071284710.3390/s140712847 ↗
56. 10.3390/s1609153310.3390/s16091533 ↗
57. 10.1109/I2MTC.2014.686090910.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860909 ↗
58. 10.1080/00405000.2018.150879910.1080/00405000.2018.1508799 ↗
59. 10.1177/014233120708160510.1177/0142331207081605 ↗
60. 10.3390/s2205173110.3390/s22051731 ↗
61. 10.1002/adfm.20200683910.1002/adfm.202006839 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41531-019-0093-510.1038/s41531-019-0093-5 ↗
63. 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.562745510.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627455 ↗
64. 10.1533/978085709353010.1533/9780857093530 ↗
65. Gehrke I · 2019
66. 10.3390/s2213474610.3390/s22134746 ↗
67. 10.3390/s2105157810.3390/s21051578 ↗
68. 10.1515/bmt-2019-016710.1515/bmt-2019-0167 ↗
69. Kazani I. Study of screen-printed electroconductive textile materials.
70. Ferri A · 2019 · 020014
71. 10.1080/00405000.2016.117787010.1080/00405000.2016.1177870 ↗
72. 10.1088/0967-3334/31/2/00910.1088/0967-3334/31/2/009 ↗
73. 10.3390/polym1210240610.3390/polym12102406 ↗
74. 10.31274/itaa.1190810.31274/itaa.11908 ↗
75. 10.3390/s2116562110.3390/s21165621 ↗
76. 10.1038/s41598-022-13701-410.1038/s41598-022-13701-4 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10960610.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109606 ↗
78. 10.1088/2058-8585/ac7dd110.1088/2058-8585/ac7dd1 ↗
79. 10.1177/004051751985876810.1177/0040517519858768 ↗
80. 10.1007/s10854-019-02047-910.1007/s10854-019-02047-9 ↗
81. 10.3390/s12121690710.3390/s121216907 ↗
82. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.291266710.1109/JSEN.2019.2912667 ↗
83. 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.263350610.1109/TNSRE.2016.2633506 ↗
84. 10.3390/electronics805047910.3390/electronics8050479 ↗
85. 10.3390/fib706005110.3390/fib7060051 ↗
86. 10.3390/s2006174210.3390/s20061742 ↗
87. 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.291639710.1109/TNSRE.2019.2916397 ↗
88. 10.1088/2058-8585/abad8910.1088/2058-8585/abad89 ↗
89. 10.1007/s10853-021-06248-810.1007/s10853-021-06248-8 ↗
90. 10.3390/s2003058710.3390/s20030587 ↗
91. 10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/00710.1088/0967-3334/28/11/007 ↗
92. 10.1109/EMBC.2013.661104610.1109/EMBC.2013.6611046 ↗
93. 10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2018.840537510.1109/ROBOSOFT.2018.8405375 ↗
94. 10.1186/s40691-020-00237-210.1186/s40691-020-00237-2 ↗
95. Elmoughni HM · 2021 · 94
96. 10.3390/s14101926010.3390/s141019260 ↗
97. 10.3390/inventions301001410.3390/inventions3010014 ↗
98. Wepner B, Wagner P, Züger M-E. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications and patents of functional textiles and fibers.
99. 10.2478/aut-2014-003110.2478/aut-2014-0031 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.elecom.2022.10724410.1016/j.elecom.2022.107244 ↗