Structural influences of two-dimensional and three-dimensional carbon/epoxy composites on mode I fracture toughness behaviors with rate effects on damage evolution
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports the mode I interlaminar fracture toughness and fracture mechanisms of two-dimensional (2D) plain woven composite and three-dimensional (3D) angle-interlock woven composite. The fracture toughness behaviors were tested with double cantilever beam method at the different loading rates from 0.5 to 100 mm/min. Critical strain energy release rate was calculated to compare the difference between the 2D and the 3D woven composites. The fractographs were photographed with scanned electronic microscopy and optical microscopy to show the fracture morphologies. We found that the 3D angle-interlock woven composite has high fracture toughness than that of 2D woven composite. The binder yarns resist the crack initiation and propagation to increase the fracture toughness. While the lower in-plane stiffness of the 3D woven composites should be considered fully for designing the 3D woven composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Funding
National Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.012 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00167-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00167-5 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11433-013-5197-z10.1007/s11433-013-5197-z ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0111760610.1007/BF01117606 ↗
7. Jia R · Text Res J · 2010 · 81 · 33510.1177/0040517510385172 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00003-310.1016/S0266-3538(01)00003-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00042-310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00042-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.04410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.046 ↗
14. 10.1177/07316844970160060410.1177/073168449701600604 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.019 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.028 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0116899110.1007/BF01168991 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.016 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00220-210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00220-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.12.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00121-210.1016/S1359-835X(96)00121-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.001 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:102262001970210.1023/A:1022620019702 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00063-310.1016/S0266-3538(98)00063-3 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.022 ↗